Peer Review & Reflection: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
This concludes the journey through the wiki. If you would like to continue browsing, use the quick links toolbar on the top right of the wiki page. Otherwise, we hope you enjoyed seeing our project.<br> | This concludes the journey through the wiki. If you would like to continue browsing, use the quick links toolbar on the top right of the wiki page. Otherwise, we hope you enjoyed seeing our project.<br> | ||
'''''[[Rules & Regulations| BACK: Rules and Regulations]]''''' | '''''[[Rules & Regulations| BACK: Rules and Regulations]]''''' | ||
<br> | |||
'''''[[PRE Groep1| FINISH]]''''' | '''''[[PRE Groep1| FINISH]]''''' | ||
Revision as of 13:33, 19 October 2014
On this page, one can find links to our peer review process and also an evaluation of our project as a whole.
Peer Review
Peer Review:9-Oct-2014
Peer Review Final:16-Oct-2014
Project Evaluation
What did we learn?
How did certain choices effect our project flow. What iterations were done
Choice - why - what did it cost use.
design proces begon wild, niet een duidelijk idee, zie problem defenition 1. toen we wisten wat we wilden ging het goed. zelfs daarna af en toe nutteloos werk, personal mailbox, chimney met flappen. persnoal mailbox maakte het iets breder, achteraf te breed waardoor we weer moesten versmallen. er moet nog heel veel gebeuren, qua techniek, wetten en wat mensen ervan vinden
This concludes the journey through the wiki. If you would like to continue browsing, use the quick links toolbar on the top right of the wiki page. Otherwise, we hope you enjoyed seeing our project.
BACK: Rules and Regulations
FINISH