Peer Review:9-Oct-2014

Back to Peer Review & Reflection.

Peer Review Table

	Luc			Tim			Frederique			Karen
	++	+	-	++	+	-	++	+	-	++	+	-
1. Quality of Work delivered	F, T	K,L			K,F,T,L		T	K,F,L		K,F,T,L
2. Ability to consult in a focused and structured way		K,F,T,L			K,L	F,T	K, T	F,L		K, F, T,L
3. Giving and Receiving feedback		K, F,T,L			K, F, T,L			K, F, T,L			K, F, T,L
4. Exectution of team role		K, T,L			K, T,L	K		K, T,L	K	T,L	K
5. Communication with fellow students	F, T	K,L			K, F, T,L		T,L	K, F		T,L	K, F
6. Honoring Agreements	F, T	K,L		F, T	K,L		F, T	K,L		F, T,L	K

Luc

Positives:

• Things you make are good, but it can always be better.
• Is focussed during meetings, has good ideas
• Does what is asked and knows what he has to do.
• Want to know what going on.

Improvement Points:

• during meetings a little more active participation
• Reading everything on the wiki (pieces of others)
• More structure in parts put on the wiki.
• Sometimes doing extra thing without being asked to do it.

Tim

Positives:

• Quality is good, short but powerful
• The input during meetings is good. more input can be given.
• very flexible with planning, good and fast communication.
• Does what is asked, always on time
• Always on time and prepared for meetings

Improvement Points:

• show more of what is done on the wiki.
• More depth like other sources etc. also to create more depth in one subject. (verder ingaan op een onderwerp)
• More participation during a meeting because your ideas are good!
• putting a little more time in the project

Frederique

Positives:

• Enough sources on the wiki, knows the core of her own part.
• Taking responsibility/chores like printing the wiki.
• Is prepared for meetings, keeps the group on track during a meeting.
• Is clear about when there are problems like when a week she can't spent a lot of time on the project.
• Does what is told to do

Improvement Points:

• Making the wiki understandable for outsiders
• making the wiki more structured.
• Reading everything the rest has done to be updated about what the rest has done.

Karen

Positives:

• Good quality of work
• has taken the role of leader, also on the wiki.
• has a lot of structure in how she works

Improvement Points:

• Make sure you are not going to do to much. letting go a bit more
• be careful with working ahead. try to do one step back sometimes to let others keep up.
• try to give other people more speaking room (when in the role of the leader)

Overall Comments

• giving and receiving feedback has not really been done, so this is the same for everybody.
• There are no strict deadlines, so we can't comment if they are being kept to.
• within the whole group there is a good communication.