Peer Review & Reflection: Difference between revisions

From Control Systems Technology Group
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 35: Line 35:
|style="border-bottom: 3px solid grey;" |  
|style="border-bottom: 3px solid grey;" |  
|}
|}
= Peer Review =
== 9-Oct-2014 ==
=== Overall Comments: ===
=== Luc ===
Positives:
*
*
Improvement Points:
*
*
=== Tim ===
Positives:
*
*
Improvement Points:
*
*
=== Frederique ===
Positives:
*
*
Improvement Points:
*
*
=== Karen ===
Positives:
*
*
Improvement Points:
*
*
== 16 Oct ==
= Project Evaluation =
What did we learn?
How did certain choices effect our project flow. What iterations were done
Choice - why - what did it cost use.

Revision as of 12:27, 6 October 2014

Quick Links
Project Trajectory Project Pages
Home Problem Definition Opening Scenarios
Planning and Milestones Background Research Chimney Rules & Regulations
Meetings Requirements Chimney to Cubby
Design Method(s) Brainstorm Cubby to Person  
Personal Logs Concepts Chosen Software
Peer Review & Reflection Whole System  

Peer Review

9-Oct-2014

Overall Comments:

Luc

Positives:

Improvement Points:

Tim

Positives:

Improvement Points:

Frederique

Positives:

Improvement Points:

Karen

Positives:

Improvement Points:

16 Oct

Project Evaluation

What did we learn? How did certain choices effect our project flow. What iterations were done Choice - why - what did it cost use.