Peer Review:9-Oct-2014

Back to Peer Review & Reflection.

Peer Review Table

	Luc			Tim			Frederique			Karen
	++	+	-	++	+	-	++	+	-	++	+	-
1. Quality of Work delivered	F	K			K,F			K,F		K,F
2. Ability to consult in a focused and structured way		K,F			K	F	K	F		K, F
3. Giving and Receiving feedback		K, F			K, F			K, F			K, F
4. Exectution of team role		K			K	K		K	K		K
5. Communication with fellow students	F	K			K, F			K, F			K, F
6. Honoring Agreements	F	K		F	K		F	K		F	K

Luc

Positives:

Improvement Points:

Tim

Positives:

Improvement Points:

Frederique

Positives:

Improvement Points:

Karen

Positives:

Improvement Points: