Peer Review:9-Oct-2014
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Back to Peer Review & Reflection.
Peer Review Table
| Luc | Tim | Frederique | Karen | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ++ | + | - | ++ | + | - | ++ | + | - | ++ | + | - | |
| 1. Quality of Work delivered | ||||||||||||
| 2. Ability to consult in a focused and structured way | ||||||||||||
| 3. Giving and Receiving feedback | ||||||||||||
| 4. Exectution of team role | ||||||||||||
| 5. Communication with fellow students | ||||||||||||
| 6. Honoring Agreements | ||||||||||||
Overall Comments:
Luc
Positives:
Improvement Points:
Tim
Positives:
Improvement Points:
Frederique
Positives:
Improvement Points:
Karen
Positives:
Improvement Points: