Peer Review:9-Oct-2014
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Back to Peer Review & Reflection.
Peer Review Table
Luc | Tim | Frederique | Karen | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Quality of Work delivered | ||||
2. Ability to consult in a focused and structured way | ||||
3. Giving and Receiving feedback | ||||
4. Exectution of team role | ||||
5. Communication with fellow students | ||||
6. Honoring Agreements |
Overall Comments:
Luc
Positives:
Improvement Points:
Tim
Positives:
Improvement Points:
Frederique
Positives:
Improvement Points:
Karen
Positives:
Improvement Points: