Peer Review:9-Oct-2014: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 107: | Line 107: | ||
| | | | ||
|} | |} | ||
=== Luc === | === Luc === | ||
| Line 149: | Line 147: | ||
=== Karen === | === Karen === | ||
Positives: | Positives: | ||
* | * Good quality of work | ||
* | * has taken the role of leader, also on the wiki. | ||
* has a lot of structure in how she works | |||
Improvement Points: | Improvement Points: | ||
* | * Make sure you are not going to do to much. letting go a bit more | ||
* | * be careful with working ahead. try to do one step back sometimes to let others keep up. | ||
* try to give other people more speaking room (when in the role of the leader) | |||
=== Overall Comments === | |||
* giving and receiving feedback has not really been done, so this is the same for everybody. | |||
* There are no strict deadlines, so we can't comment if they are being kept to. | |||
* within the whole group there is a good communication. | |||
Latest revision as of 11:09, 11 October 2014
Back to Peer Review & Reflection.
Peer Review Table
| Luc | Tim | Frederique | Karen | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ++ | + | - | ++ | + | - | ++ | + | - | ++ | + | - | |
| 1. Quality of Work delivered | F, T | K,L | K,F,T,L | T | K,F,L | K,F,T,L | ||||||
| 2. Ability to consult in a focused and structured way | K,F,T,L | K,L | F,T | K, T | F,L | K, F, T,L | ||||||
| 3. Giving and Receiving feedback | K, F,T,L | K, F, T,L | K, F, T,L | K, F, T,L | ||||||||
| 4. Exectution of team role | K, T,L | K, T,L | K | K, T,L | K | T,L | K | |||||
| 5. Communication with fellow students | F, T | K,L | K, F, T,L | T,L | K, F | T,L | K, F | |||||
| 6. Honoring Agreements | F, T | K,L | F, T | K,L | F, T | K,L | F, T,L | K | ||||
Luc
Positives:
- Things you make are good, but it can always be better.
- Is focussed during meetings, has good ideas
- Does what is asked and knows what he has to do.
- Want to know what going on.
Improvement Points:
- during meetings a little more active participation
- Reading everything on the wiki (pieces of others)
- More structure in parts put on the wiki.
- Sometimes doing extra thing without being asked to do it.
Tim
Positives:
- Quality is good, short but powerful
- The input during meetings is good. more input can be given.
- very flexible with planning, good and fast communication.
- Does what is asked, always on time
- Always on time and prepared for meetings
Improvement Points:
- show more of what is done on the wiki.
- More depth like other sources etc. also to create more depth in one subject. (verder ingaan op een onderwerp)
- More participation during a meeting because your ideas are good!
- putting a little more time in the project
Frederique
Positives:
- Enough sources on the wiki, knows the core of her own part.
- Taking responsibility/chores like printing the wiki.
- Is prepared for meetings, keeps the group on track during a meeting.
- Is clear about when there are problems like when a week she can't spent a lot of time on the project.
- Does what is told to do
Improvement Points:
- Making the wiki understandable for outsiders
- making the wiki more structured.
- Reading everything the rest has done to be updated about what the rest has done.
Karen
Positives:
- Good quality of work
- has taken the role of leader, also on the wiki.
- has a lot of structure in how she works
Improvement Points:
- Make sure you are not going to do to much. letting go a bit more
- be careful with working ahead. try to do one step back sometimes to let others keep up.
- try to give other people more speaking room (when in the role of the leader)
Overall Comments
- giving and receiving feedback has not really been done, so this is the same for everybody.
- There are no strict deadlines, so we can't comment if they are being kept to.
- within the whole group there is a good communication.