PRE2023 3 Group8: Difference between revisions

From Control Systems Technology Group
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (App progress photo added)
mNo edit summary
 
(55 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{DISPLAYTITLE:PRE2023 3 Group8: ShapeShifters}}
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|+ Members
|+ Members
Line 27: Line 27:
|1732358
|1732358
|Psychology & Technology
|Psychology & Technology
|}
|}  
== Introduction ==
 
Nowadays technological innovations have penetrated nearly every aspect of our lives, the realm of fitness remains a pivotal area that is broadened every year. With new research done and the variety of different exercise forms, there is a ton of information on this subject. In the app store, there are over 97,000 fitness and health apps providing all kinds of information. This can be viewed as overwhelming. How are we supposed to know which app to choose? And will this app live up to my expectations? Or will I be bored after using it for a week? This overload of information can cause a barrier for the population, because we simply do not know what to do with all the information provided. Not only the overwhelming amount of information is a barrier to work out, also the lack of motivation seems to be a contributing factor to the lack of physical activity among young adults. This lifestyle among young adults not only contributes to a variety of health issues but also impacts their overall productivity and quality of life.  
 
Despite the awareness regarding the benefits of physical activity, a substantial portion of young adults remain disengaged from fitness activities. Furthermore, not only the lack of motivation can be discouraging, but also for beginners, the gym environment can seem like a daunting place where you feel judged by everyone around you. This intimidation factor, coupled with the absence of motivation towards fitness, often leaves individuals feeling overwhelmed and even less motivated.  
 
As we recognized these challenges as a call to action, this project aims to motivate young adults who want to work out but are still reluctant to go to the gym. This is done by the fusion of fitness and gamification. Our mission is twofold: to address the issue of lack of physical activity amongst the youth and to inspire and empower individuals who have yet to embark on their fitness journey.
 
The decision to focus our efforts on developing a gamified fitness app is because games are considered to be fun and engaging. So, by using the principles of game design and applying them to fitness activities, the project aims to put a twist on the way individuals perceive and engage with exercise. Through interactive challenges, rewards systems, and immersive experiences, the app seeks to diffuse the fitness journey with elements of excitement, competition, and achievement, in order to create a fun and engaging app.  
 
Furthermore, the choice to target young adults as a demographic specifically is rooted in not only the convenience of having similar aged people as a demographic, but also because young adults are in their prime years to shape future health behaviours (Bonnie et al., 2015). By forming positive exercise habits early on, we not only will prevent the health risks that will come with a lazy lifestyle, but also lays a foundation for a lifetime of well-being and vitality.  
 
Moreover, the commitment to inclusivity and accessibility underscores the dedication to reaching individuals who may feel excluded from traditional fitness spaces by for example the overwhelming amount of information or the intimidation of the fitness community as mentioned above. By providing a digital platform that helps diverse fitness levels, preferences, and schedules, the app strives to create a welcoming and supportive community where every individual feels empowered to embark on their fitness journey at their own pace.
 
== State of the art ==
When examining the landscape of fitness apps currently dominating the market, it's evident that they come in various forms, with distinctions between free and subscription-based models. Popular free apps like Nike Training Club, FitOn, and Adidas Training offer accessible workout options often using video or audio guidance to explain exercises. Additionally, these apps frequently incorporate features such as follow-along workouts with personal trainers and filtering systems based on difficulty, time, and workout type (KevTheTrainer, 2022). On the other hand, subscription-based apps like Muscle Booster, Peloton, Fitbot, and Aaptiv offer more specialized services, often providing premium content and personalized training experiences. Despite these variations, both free and subscription-based apps share a common goal of motivating users to engage in physical activities.


== Plan Week 1: ==
Now let's delve into the already existing gamification in fitness apps. Mack (2023) made a distinction between 5 different fitness apps that already use gamification, PlayFitt, Hops, Treeceps, Nerd fitness journey, and Fitness RPG. Looking at the details of the gamified apps we see that there are several apps that use a leaderboard in which you are compared to other players (Fitness RPG and PlayFitt),  others make use of daily trackers to stimulate the forming of habits (PlayFitt, Hops, Nerd fitness journey, and Fitness RPG) and some give you the opportunity to customize the character (PlayFitt and Hops).  
subject


* Apps that help motivate youth to exercise
Another more recent study in 2019 analyzed 212352 health and fitness apps of these apps it was found that about 5018 could be considered gamified. However, a mere 344 were truly classified as behavior change apps. This is a shocking 0.16% of all ‘health’ apps. This study didn’t just look at fitness/exercise apps but also at apps to help stop smoking or to eat healthier. The 344 behavior change apps were then further analyzed to check their effectiveness. Two scales were used on the first scale the apps scored an average of 2.93 out of 5. And on a one point per criteria scale the highest scored was 17 out of 21 with an average of 7.8. This indicates that even though a lot of fitness apps exist they severely lack a strong foundation of behavior change theory (McKay et al., 2019). Our app could set itself apart by including some true behavior change theory. With especially crucial things like social support being only used by 3% of all apps (Edwards et al., 2016). According to an older study this can be attributed to the fact that app developers come from a variety of backgrounds. They often lack the Theory to base their apps upon. So if we want to improve on these apps we should use behavior change theory to expand on the existing foundations of the apps that are currently available.
objective


* Creating a healthier youth by having them exercise more
This literature research mostly provided knowledge on the lack of behavior change theory in fitness apps. Combining the knowledge of what the apps seems to lack now, what the users want the app to contain (through surveys) and what behavior change theory says should work could create a more stimulating fitness app.


Who are the users?
'''Technology acceptance Model'''


* Youth (16-25)
In recent years, the integration of gamification elements within fitness apps has revolutionized the way users perceive and engage with physical activities. Research in this domain has shed light on the intricate relationship between gamification, user perceptions, and behavioral outcomes, offering valuable insights into the design and effectiveness of these applications.
* Motivate to go to the gym  


What do they require?
A seminal study investigated how users of fitness apps perceive their attitudes and motivations towards physical activities, and how gamification elements within these apps relate to their self-efficacy in performing such activities. Analyzing a vast dataset comprising 87,074 Fitbit user reviews and conducting subsequent surveys, the findings revealed that gamification elements such as self-monitoring, goal-setting, social support, and rewards significantly influenced users' participation in physical activities. Moreover, these elements were found to enhance users' self-efficacy, consequently boosting their motivation to engage in physical activities through the app.


* They need motivation to exercise
Furthermore, the integration of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) into the analysis provided a deeper understanding of users' perceptions of fitness apps and technology adoption behavior. The TAM posits that users are more likely to accept and utilize a new technology when they perceive it as easy to use, useful, and reliable. In the context of fitness apps, the perceived ease of use, usefulness, and system reliability were found to significantly impact users' motivation and intention to engage in physical activities.
* Reward system
* Guidance for exercise


Approach, milestones, and deliverables
Methodologically, studies have emphasized rigorous data collection procedures, including analyzing user reviews and conducting surveys among diverse user groups. Statistical analyses, such as confirmatory factor analysis, have been employed to ensure the validity and reliability of the findings. Recommendations for future research include exploring user experience, demographic characteristics, and conducting experimental studies using longitudinal survey methods to gain deeper insights into the adoption and utilization of fitness apps.


* Research motivational techniques (for exercising)
In summary, the state-of-the-art research underscores the pivotal role of gamification in shaping user perceptions, motivations, and behaviors towards physical activities through fitness apps. By integrating gamification elements effectively and considering user perceptions and system attributes, developers can design more engaging and effective fitness apps to promote physical activity participation and improve overall health outcomes.  
* Questionnaire about what motivations works for people
* Brainstorm about reward system and avatars
* Create an app layout


* Connect a fitness database
== Theory ==
* Classification of goals
* Questionnaire at the end
Theory 


Who will do what:
Theory was used to guide design choices together with user feedback. Here choices made are shown and theory-relevant choices are discussed.
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|Members:
|'''Choices''' 
|Main Task(s):
|'''Literature''' 
|'''Questionnaire''' 
|'''Focus group''' 
|-
|-
|Geert Boer
|Use of gamification 
|App development
|X 
|X 
|X 
|-
|Human character 
|  
|X 
|  
|-
|Looks character 
|  
|  
|X 
|-
|When notifications 
|  
|X  
|X 
|-
|Kind of notifications 
|X
|X  
|  
|-
|Streak 
|X  
|  
|  
|-
|Ranking among friends 
|X  
|X  
|  
|-
|Competition and Cooperation 
|X  
|X  
|  
|-
|Wheel 
|X  
|  
|  
|-
|GUI/Colours app 
|X  
|X  
|X  
|-
|Setup workout screen 
|  
|X  
|X  
|-
|-
|Roel Domensino
|Having personal goals 
|App development, Motivation
|X 
|  
|X  
|-
|-
|Daan Kuijpers
|XP progression system 
|App development
|X 
|X  
|X 
|-
|-
|Louise Rietra
|Chatting with friends 
|Motivation, questionaries  
|  
|  
|X  
|-
|-
|Chris Smeets
|Having different kinds of cardio 
|App development/design, physiology
|  
|  
|X  
|-
|-
|Thijn van Veggel
|App used to design our product
|App design, Motivation
|X
|
|
|}
|}


== Content Week 2: ==


==== '''<big>GUI of an App</big>''' ====
Use of gamification
'''Colors'''


It is best to not use more than three colors, it should be as simplistic as possible. Different colors generate specific human behavior. Social media apps usually use mostly bright and vibrant colors, while mind and body apps usually use more neutral colors. Here are some words with associated colors:
The very first choice made to increase exercising among young adults, was to make use of gamification in a fitness app. Gamification was considered and used given that “Motivation is demonstrated by an individual’s choice to engage in an activity and the intensity of effort or persistence in that activity. Current approaches concern two dominant clusters that play a role in determining player’s motivation: extrinsic and intrinsic motivation.  Gamification combines these two motivations; on one hand using extrinsic rewards such as levels, points, badges to improve engagement while striving to raise feelings of achieving mastery, autonomy, sense of belonging” (Richter et al, 2014). This double working paired with young adults prevalence in gaming cemented the idea to use gamification to reach our goal.  


* Security and trust: Blue  
* Speed: Red
* Cheapness: Orange and yellow
* High quality: Black (orange the least)
* High technology: Black, blue and gray
* Reliability: Blue
* Fun: Orange and yellow


You have to think about the impression that you want to give the users. If you want to give the expression it is an entertaining app, than use warm tones, but if you want to show it is a trade or e-commerce app, then use cooler tones like blue or a gray-scaled scheme, which is more reliable.  
XP progression system


https://medium.com/sketch-app-sources/principles-of-color-psychology-in-mobile-application-design-8d338144ffff
As the name suggests, a progression system is a system where users are rewarded for exercising in the form of progression in a certain system. This can range from simply gaining points or leveling up to collecting fictional characters. In our case this is in the form of XP (experience points), as this was preferred according to the questionnaire. This system encourages users through extrinsic motivation with rewards, to improve engagement, while also raising feelings of achieving mastery, autonomy, sense of belonging as intrinsic motivation (Richter et al, 2014).  


'''GUI'''
The most important decisions to be made are how difficult should this system be, how often should rewards be given and should punishments be used as well? 


The primary goal of a GUI if to allow the user to concentrate on the task at hand. The GUI must therefore make the interface between the human and app smooth. Humans have limited memory, so it is better to group information using the Gestalt principle, which means humans have a short term memory span of around 7 items. A good GUI should present information that is contextual and consistent. It should avoid unnecessary detail and put as much information in as less words as possible to conserve screen space. It is better to utilize familiar data formats, if they exist. Furthermore, a GUI should use colors to group information. Graphical boundaries are very effective in grouping items. Other highlighting techniques are reverse video, brightness, underlining and flashing. The information should be presented in a sequence which the user needs it in. More important information should precede the lesser important information and general items should precede more specific items. Frequently used or needed information or commands should be in the most important location. If there is no order, use alphabetical order. A bad GUI prevents the user from concentrating on its task. When designing a GUI, keep the objective in mind and avoid needless complexity.  


https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/279044.279051
“People with high motivation to succeed prefer tasks of intermediate difficulty. However, if the motive to avoid failure is stronger people prefer either very simple or very difficult tasks” (Richter et al, 2014). As our app is used to succeed in exercising regularly, most users should possess a motivation to succeed instead of a motivation to not fail. As such we will implement tasks of intermediate difficulty based on users' previous data.  


'''“Use (Randomly) an Intermittent Reward Timing (RIRT)'''. This is the most powerful schedule for dopamine release and '''staying motivated'''. The casinos use it to take people’s money. It works 100% of the time. You can use RIRT to your advantage, to stay motivated in any pursuit. The key is to '''celebrate your wins, but do not celebrate every win'''” (Huberman, 2023). Sources suggest that the most efficient way of handing out rewards is by making the random and unpredictable. To implement this, a prize wheel with different bonusses is used. This prize wheel may be used after completing a certain amount of exercise schedules. Additionally by attaining a streak, which will be explained later, this prize wheel can be upgraded to possess better bonusses.


==== '''<big>How to motivate users</big>''' ====
The normal exercise rewards are handed out when a user completes a set of exercises and when they complete a full schedule. Thus making a exercise count double if they complete the full schedule. Additionally extra multipliers are handed out for consistency and personal improvement. These rewards are always handed out instead of using RIRT as these are the cornerstone of the progression system.  
Research motivation


List of decision points:


* Improvement narrative (character to improve or collect, items to be collected, room/area building, etc.)
“We compared the perceived effectiveness of Reward and Punishment quantitatively and found that ''Reward strategies can engage users and make behaviour fun, reinforce commitments to goals, reveal some consequences of bad behaviour, and their tendency to redirect behaviour intention and trivialise the consequences of bad behaviour''. In contrast, ''Punishment strategies can be depressing, discouraging, and demoralising; therefore, elements of Punishment must be strategically implemented in the persuasive gamified systems, especially those targeted at health behaviours''” (Orji et al., 2023). Given this risk of using punishments when targeting health behaviors, we decided that it would be better to not implement them as the risk of using them is not worth the possible positive effect they could have, especially since we don’t have a lot of experience on how to strategically implement them.  
* Multiplayer (cooperation, competition, both)
* Tone of messages (very uplifting messages, more heavy handed messages Duolingo style)  
* Frequency of messages (very often, less often, after inactivity)
* Consistency rewards (streak, how often to maintain streak)
* Punishment or rewards  
* Difficulty


  


Relevant conclusions from sources:
Competition and cooperation


Reaching goals important
This implementation is all about using cooperation and/or competition to inspire more motivation in the users. This can be done through teams, rankings, challenges between individuals, challenges between teams, communal goals and the like. According to sources the combination of cooperation and competition is most effective at motivation (Tauer & Harackiewicz, 2004). To ensure more certainty, we decided to inquire about this in the survey to ensure the correct choice is made. The results from the survey supported our decision to use both competition and cooperation, but suggested a stronger focus on competition and cooperation between friends. As such a team against team based system was implemented, where a team has the option to send a battle request to another team aside from the regular random matching. This way can opt to compete amongst themselves. Additionally the focus group suggested the implementation of a chat for the teams. This suggestion was adopted. Finally, to further boost competition between friends, the friends list is sorted based on weekly exercise points. These are handed out when one completes and exercise schedule and are reset every week.


Induce identified regulation (make sure that the consumer sees exercising as a very valuable thing to do for them)  
 


Obstacles: lack of time, energy, and willpower.
Motivational messages/reminders 


Males were motivated by intrinsic factors (strength, competition, and challenge) (''p'' < .05) and females by extrinsic factors (ie, weight management and appearance)  
According to De Vries et al. (2017), personality and sex of a user are relevant for the effectiveness of messages with a certain tone. Generally, the most effective tone is positive and cooperative. Given the difference per user, we decided to obtain opinions from the users by including it in the survey and by allowing a user to choose between a few different tones which were preferred the most according to the survey. The positive and cooperative tone along with the funny tone was found to be the most preferred and are thus implemented, where the user can select in the settings which one of these types of messages they would like to receive.


'''Use (Randomly) an Intermittent Reward Timing (RIRT)'''. This is the most powerful schedule for dopamine release and '''staying motivated'''. The casinos use it to take people’s money. It works 100% of the time. You can use RIRT to your advantage, to stay motivated in any pursuit. The key is to '''celebrate your wins, but do not celebrate every win'''.
 


In conclusion, team sport activities seem to be intrinsically motivating to the participants through positive social interaction and play. They are therefore more likely to result in exercise continuation than activities that rely primarily on extrinsic motivation such as the expectation of improved health and well-being.
Streak


A diary study of female students engaged in weight loss attempts showed that, of participants who self-reported being furthest from achieving their long-term goals, those who experienced positive emotions arising from weight-loss behaviour on one day expended greater goal-directed effort on the subsequent day than did those who experienced negative emotions
A streak is a way of rewarding users for consistently doing something. According to Fook en Dastane (2021), consistency systems such as this are relatively effective at creating habits and as such are certainly something we would want to implement. In our case such a system will work weekly, where the user will get a progressively increasing multiplier to rewards, they get from doing exercises. It is not daily since many cannot exercise every day and it is not longer than weekly since exercise should be done regularly (Siddiqui et al., 2010). As the desired frequency of going to the gym differs per person, we decided to allow the user to choose how often one has to go each week to retain the streak. A more difficult to retain streak is made to be more rewarding than one which is easier to retain, to stimulate more frequent gym visits.  


Health-promoting actions which are extrinsically motivated  i.e., performed to attain tangible rewards or avoid punishments, comply with instructions, or otherwise satisfy external demands  may be less likely to be repeated than actions pursued due to genuine personal interest (i.e., intrinsic motivation), at least when external support for action is removed (Ryan & Deci, 2000). Intervention developers must therefore promote behaviours in a way that encourages people to internalise the need and desire for change, thus engendering self-determined, rather than compliant, behaviour change (Deci & Ryan, 1985).


Planning is as important for helping people repeat a behaviour as it is for initiation. Coping planning may be particularly important for supporting continued repetition of behaviour. One study found that for physical activity, higher levels of coping planning led to a stronger intention behaviour association, although only for those who were physically active at the start of the study
GUI


 
“A good GUI should present information that is contextual and consistent. It should avoid unnecessary detail and put as much information in as little words as possible to conserve screen space. It is better to utilize familiar data formats, if they exist (Jansen, 1998). Furthermore, a GUI should use colours to group information. Graphical boundaries are very effective in grouping items (Jansen, 1998). Other highlighting techniques are reverse video, brightness, underlining and flashing (Jansen, 1998). The information should be presented in a sequence in which the user needs it in. More important information should precede the lesser important information and general items should precede more specific items. Frequently used, needed information or commands should be in the most important location (Jansen, 1998). If there is no order, use alphabetical order. The GUI of our app was shaped in accordance with this detailed explanation. Changes were made based on feedback from the users.


These findings suggest that competition and cooperation both have positive aspects and that structuring recreational activities to include both can facilitate high levels of both intrinsic motivation and performance.


 
Color


The theory we developed posits that people are motivated to use TMT because of convenience and flexibility, environmental control, progress tracking with positive reinforcement, and knowledgeable trainers. We have observed that users report feeling a higher sense of motivation to apps that incorporate all of these aspects in their training
“Furthermore, the colours used in an app should not be more than 3, it should be as simplistic as possible (Kachan, 2021). Different colors generate specific human behavior. Social media apps usually use mostly bright and vibrant colors, while mind and body apps usually use more neutral colors. Here are some words with associated colors:  


 
* Security and trust: Blue    
* Speed: Red  
* Cheapness: Orange and yellow  
* High quality: Black (orange the least)  
* High technology: Black, blue and gray  
* Reliability: Blue  
* Fun: Orange and yellow  


In terms of habit formation, according to Chen et al. (Citation2017), social motivation and goal-setting are key factors for a sustained use of SFMAs. This is also dependent on the type of user. Besides, there is time-dependent variability. Many authors observe that performance feedback is more stable than social feedback, which decreases over time. Stragier et al. (Citation2016) confirm that self-tracking is the paramount reason for adopting a SFMA, but also that the social value from the device contributes to maintaining its use over time.  
You have to think about the impression that you want to give the users. If you want to give the expression it is an entertaining app, then use warm tones, but if you want to show it is a trade or e-commerce app, then use cooler tones like blue or a gray-scaled scheme, which is more reliable (Kachan, 2021). Given this information we decided to initially use blue as it provided trust and security that we needed as a ‘startup’ from a student group and because the first questionnaire showed that the users would prefer this color the most. The focus group gave a good suggestion of allowing people to change their color scheme in the settings. We decided to adopt this, while keeping the blue color as the default color. The optional colors to change to were orange, green and light yellow.  


 


harabod et al. (Citation2013) identify three main aims behind self-quantification: monitoring oneself (i.e. concerning a risk or threshold), making behaviour regular (i.e. to form a habit or routine) and/or optimising performance. Research indicates that apart from the first of these, SFMAs have somewhat limited effects; the information and analysis they provide often remain trivial.
App used to design our App


 
Finally, we decided to choose Figma as our design tool for several reasons, all of which contribute to a smooth and effective design process for our app. First of all, Figma is user-friendly and easy to use. For newcomers like us, designing in Figma is very intuitive and accessible, allowing us to get started quickly.


One of the vaunted advantages of digital technology is that it connects users. In SFMAs, this can translate to sharing information, providing encouragement or motivating performance through competition or emulation. Same-sex users of similar athletic levels have the most significant influence on each other, due to processes of social influence and behavioural contagion (Aral & Nicolaides, Citation2017). Indeed, most of the exchanges in SFMAs are between ‘similar’ people (Pharabod et al., Citation2013), who compare information such as levels of performance, commitment, progress, etc. This is not unlike how sports institutions establish a hierarchy of competitive levels. Interestingly, the less active/regular practitioners influence the more active to a higher degree than the opposite; the creation of a homogeneous group seems to increase the latter’s motivation through ‘realistic’ emulation and flattering comparisons that encourage the maintenance of their superiority
One of the most convincing aspects of Figma is the ability to easily collaborate with others in real time. Whether our team is working remotely or sitting together on a screen design, Figma's real-time collaboration features allow us to work on the same project at the same time.  


 
Moreover, Figma provides TU/e students with full access to their platform. This is especially valuable for us, as being students and having access to all of Figma's features and capabilities allows us to develop our designs professionally without limitations. We also received positive feedback from other students who had used Figma before.


Research shows that a user’s motivation to use an SFMA depends on how successful it is in producing outcomes. If these are positive, there is pleasure, confidence and a sense of achievement; this can help to create good habits and lead to the continued use of the device (Lupton, Citation2017; Semerjian, Citation2017). Carter et al. (Citation2018) explain drop-outs by the mitigation of a device’s effects over time, suggesting a decrease in extrinsic psychological factors. Encouragement and emulation through comparison do not generate sufficiently sustainable motivation (Goodyear et al., Citation2019), so after a phase of novelty-related enthusiasm and excitement, weariness sets in (Fritz et al., Citation2014). Worse, disappointment or even a sense of shame or guilt develops if the results are poor and the objectives are not achieved (Goodyear et al., Citation2019).  
All in all, Figma has proven to be the ideal choice for making our app design because of its user-friendliness, collaborative capabilities, student access and positive reputation among its users. With Figma as our design program, we can create a high-quality and effective design for our app.  


 
== Method ==


A source of early rejection may be that a device is not consistent with the user’s self-image: ‘it’s for the elderly’; ‘it’s for sports addicts’ (Lazar et al., Citation2015). The device may be excessively visible or have problems in terms of comfort or ergonomics. Some report other issues that lead to frustration:


* in terms of functioning: reduced interoperability or compatibility, time and effort required to load or sync data, impossible to use due to lack of connection (Canhoto & Arp, Citation2017)
* in terms of data: inaccuracy of measurements, unhelpful data, difficulty in understanding data (especially for novices) (Chen et al., Citation2017)
* in terms of transparency: the possibility of cheating and artificially increasing performance distorts comparisons (Goodyear et al., Citation2019).


When there is a feeling that a device requires ‘work’, the pleasure related to physical activity decreases. Etkin (Citation2016) argues that the expected enhancement of a workout is often coupled with diminished pleasure when self-tracking, due to both a decrease in intrinsic motivation and an excessive focus on results. A study on connected cyclists (Lupton et al., in press) shows that while the motivation and rewards obtained through SFMAs are appreciated, the data collection and analysis necessitates attention on a daily basis (e.g. preparation, charging, start-up and regular verification of the device). After a training session, interpreting the data (checking its accuracy, contextualising it and analysing it) is also time consuming, and somewhat distracts from the pure leisure of the practice. For these former users, unsubscribing from the app frees them from a burden that spoils their enjoyment of a sport meant to be recreational.  
To reach the most desirable product for our users, we focused on obtaining and implementing feedback to shape our product, while using literature as support.  As such, we started with literary research on motivation, habit formation, exercise, current fitness apps, gamification and app design.  This research allowed us to form a general outline on what kind of features we possibly wanted to use in our app and on how the app would look. This general outline was used to create a questionnaire which provided feedback on whether possible features should be implemented or not, if so in what way and whether features were missing.  


 
With a clear image of what features and thus kind of pages/screens should be in the app, an actual visualization and design of how these screens would look and flow from one another had to be made. As such, all members were tasked to create sketches for multiple different screens and a block diagram was made to illustrate the interactions between the screens.  The multiple sketches for each screen were discussed to decide upon a clear outline for each screen. Each member was subsequently tasked to create a specific screen in detail according to the outline decided upon.  


Literature to date on the topic of SFMAs demonstrates that some users find real support in setting goals, planning their sessions, and/or making physical activity a regular routine. These effects are in line with the promises of the device developers, and they should not be underestimated. The main innovation of SFMAs is their ability to uniquely combine features likely to generate motivation: belonging to a community, quantifying and keeping a record of one’s activity, analysing and comparing data, and discovering new practice routes.  
These detailed screens slightly adapted to conform to one style and were evaluated through a focus group to get new feedback. Most of this feedback was implemented to further enhance our product. To ensure that the feedback was implemented correctly, interviews with some of the members of the focus group were held to discuss our implementation of their feedback. Sadly, due to time constraints the new feedback from these interviews was not implemented.  


 
Finally, to test our final design another questionnaire was sent out to get a read on user satisfaction and on how our product would compare against existing products.


The results indicate that the implicit, unconscious need to achieve facilitates regular engagement in sport activities, but the explicit, conscious orientation toward achievement does not. The enrichment of sports environments with incentives for the implicit achievement motive may thus attract more people to participate in sport activities.
== Results ==
The results from the first survey were as follows:  


 
number of survey participants: 113


Despite large potential and abundant usage by young people, limited research is available on apps and health promotion for adolescents. Apps seem to be a promising health promotion strategy as a monitoring tool. Apps can enable users to set targets, enhance self‐monitoring, and increase awareness. Three apps incorporated social features, making them “social media,” but hardly any evidence appeared available about their potential.
'''Personal identification'''


 
39.8% female, 57.5% male, 2.7% other


The wide variety of apps included in this 2018 study and the limited number of behavior change techniques found in many apps suggest an opportunity for improvement in app design that will promote sustained and significant lifestyle behavior change and, therefore, better health.  
Average age is 19.76, ranging from 17 to 24


 
94.7% is a Student


The results indicate that all four hypotheses were supported.  Consistent with our hypothesis, facilitating conditions positively affect fitness app user’s physical activity behavior. Further, user’s attitude has a significant positive effect on their actual physical activity behavior. Thus, H3 and H4 were supported. As for the moderating effects, perceived competitive climate was found to positively moderate the relationship between social comparison and user’s attitude, which is consistent with H1. On the other hand, self-efficacy about physical activity negatively moderates the relationship between social comparison and attitude, which is consistent with H2.


'''Current exercise situation'''


-Making the app “social” is more effective than making it “fun” in helping consumers sustain their efforts in physical activity.  
Average frequency of exercise is about 3 times a week (When considering “more than 5” as 6.5)


-Consumers using the app focusing on social value showed better performance in walking and higher intentions to continue using the app.
About 70% (69.9%) would like to exercise more


2/3 of all participants would like to do strength training, 44.1% would like to do Hypertrophy and 68,5% would like to do cardiovascular training.


Gamification was used by 64% of mobile applications. Most applications that included gamification (97%) targeted behaviors related to physical activity and weight loss. Applications focused on other areas such as reproductive health, meditation, and sleep used gamification less often (11%). Game elements used most commonly included goal setting (78%), social influences (78%), and challenges (63%), while less common elements included points (6%) and levels (3%). No applications incorporated behavioral economics principles specified in the study.
61.9% is interested in using an app for exercise motivation


 
64.2% does not currently use a tracking/fitness app


Gamification was commonly used by popular health and fitness mobile applications, but none used the specified behavioral economic principles to design rewards or points. Mobile applications could potentially improve their use if their design better leveraged principles from behavioral economics.


Link: Effectiveness of Loyalty Programs in Customer Retention: A Multiple Mediation Analysis - Andy Chin Woon Fook, Omkar Dastane, 2021 (sagepub.com)
'''App shape'''


Findings show that there is a significant positive impact of loyalty programs on customer retention.  
Option 1(lightblue and gray) is the most popular (55.8%), others don’t get higher than 22.1%. Around 10% is displeased with all concepts.  


Link: Effects of Perceived Agency and Message Tone in Responding to a Virtual Personal Trainer | Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (acm.org)  
Preferred tones are Funny (56.8%) and Considering (43.2%)  


Like in-person coaches, the live human trainer who used negatively valenced messages were well-regarded; however, when the agent or avatar used negatively valenced messages, participants responded more poorly than when they used positively valenced ones. Perceived agency also affected rapport: compared to the agent, users felt more rapport with the live human trainer or the avatar. Regardless of trainer type, they also felt more rapport - and said they put in more effort - with trainers that used positively valenced messages than those that used negatively valenced ones. However, in reality, they put in more physical effort (as measured by heart rate) when trainers employed the more negatively valenced affective tone.


Links: 
'''Multiplayer'''


A word of advice: how to tailor motivational text messages based on behavior change theory to personality and gender | Personal and Ubiquitous Computing (springer.com)
Competing against other people is endorsed by 73.5%


Daily Motivational Text Messages to Promote Physical Activity in University Students: Results From a Microrandomized Trial | Annals of Behavioral Medicine | Oxford Academic (oup.com)
Of those who want multiplayer:  


Full article: The role of questionnaire length and reminders frequency on response rates to a web-based epidemiologic study: a randomised trial (tandfonline.com)
94,4% would like to compete against friends


Full article: Towards understanding the mechanism through which reward and punishment motivate or demotivate behaviours (tandfonline.com)
80,6% would like to compete against others


 
(note that the amount of people that replied varies, with n=90 and n=93 respectively, this is also not representative with the original 73.5%, showing that on average about 9 people answered against multiplayer, but still gave feedback on its creation)


# So far, research has argued both in favour and against using Reward and Punishment strategies in behaviour change applications due to mixed results with respect to their effectiveness. It was unclear how interventions using these strategies could motivate or demotivate behaviours. With this paper, we elucidate the ''strengths and weaknesses of Reward and Punishment strategies by showing that both can have positive (e.g. increase the level of commitment, enjoyment, and engagement, helping users achieve their goals) and negative (e.g. experience frustrations, depression and can promote cheating) influences on people’s behaviour and perception of persuasive gamified systems''.


# We compared the perceived effectiveness of Reward and Punishment quantitatively and found that ''Reward strategies can engage users and make behaviour fun, reinforce commitments to goals, reveal some consequences of bad behaviour, and their tendency to redirect behaviour intention and trivialise the consequences of bad behaviour''. In contrast, ''Punishment strategies can be depressing, discouraging, and demoralising; therefore, elements of Punishment must be strategically implemented in the persuasive gamified systems, especially those targeted at health behaviours''.
'''Push notifications'''  


# We offered practical design recommendations for implementing the ''Reward and Punishment strategies in persuasive gamified systems to increase their effectiveness''. These include recommendations such as implementing mechanisms to ''prevent cheating, consider using dynamic reward and multiple implementations for the same persuasive strategy, as well as offer a variety of reinforcement strategies and adaptation mechanisms to attract new users while sustaining existing users''.
About 70% (69.6%) would like to receive motivational push notifications


 
Only 38,4% would like to receive notifications about in game events or other-player progression.


lLink: Studying Gamification: The Effect of Rewards and Incentives on Motivation | SpringerLink


Motivation is demonstrated by an individual’s choice to engage in an activity and the intensity of effort or persistence in that activity (Garris et al., 2002). Current approaches concern two dominant clusters that play a role in determining player’s motivation: extrinsic and intrinsic motivation (Deci, Koestner, & Ryan, 1999; Ryan & Deci, 2000a). Gamification combines these two motivations; on one hand using extrinsic rewards such as levels, points, badges to improve engagement while striving to raise feelings of achieving mastery, autonomy, sense of belonging (Muntean, 2011).
'''Program creation'''


'''2.4.2 Need Achievement Theory'''
78,4% would like to make their own exercise program


Achievement behavior is directed at developing or demonstrating, to self or to others, high rather than low ability (Atkinson & Litwin, 1960; Nicholls, 1984). It implies that in achievement situations people desire success to the extent that it indicates high ability and seek to avoid failure which may be a signal of low ability (Nicholls, 1984). According to Atkinson, to achieve success and to avoid failure are two separate motives. These two motives affect the level of task difficulty people choose to undertake. People with high motivation to succeed prefer tasks of intermediate difficulty (Atkinson & Litwin, 1960). However, if the motive to avoid failure is stronger people prefer either very simple or very difficult tasks (Atkinson & Litwin, 1960).
88,4% would like to receive a program, based on their goals


Goal setting theory claims that difficult, specific, context-appropriate, and immediate goals, rather than long-term goals, motivate to achieve more (Ling et al., 2005). Goals affect performance by directing attention, assembling effort, increasing persistence and belief in ability to complete a task (Locke et al., 1981). Goal setting is most likely to improve task performance when the goals are specific and sufficiently challenging, the subjects have sufficient ability, feedback is provided to show progress in relation to the goal, rewards are given for goal attainment, and the assigned goals are actually accepted by the individual (Locke et al., 1981).
On a scale from 1 to 5, the preferred customizability is 3.7 (2.7 if 0 to 4)  


 
Tracking in between exercises is possible for 85.7%


Kraiger et al. (1993) assert that self-efficacy can be positively stimulated by dividing tasks of higher difficulty into smaller, less difficult tasks. They state that the more people believe they are able to bring a certain task to a successful ending the better they will perform at this task (Kraiger, Ford, & Salas, 1993).
On a scale from 1 to 5, the willingness to have predetermined exercise times is 2.25 (1.25 if 0 to 4)  
 
 
 
According to the theory we evaluate our beliefs, abilities, and reactions by comparing them with those of others (Gilbert, Giesler, & Morris, 1995; Lillienfeld et al., 2009). Festinger’s “similarity hypothesis” predicts that people compare themselves with similar others (Festinger, 1954; Gilbert et al., 1995). The “unidirectional drive upward” asserts people wish to continually improve their abilities. Altogether people strive toward a better position than that of others they compare to (Wood, 1989).
 
 
Motivational implementations
 
Concise-choices made-substantiation
 
Possible implementations:
 
-Progression system
 
-Multiplayer
 
-Motivational messages/reminders
 
-Consistency system
 
-Exercise schedule
 
 
For each of these implementations, choices must be made on how to introduce them to the app or not at all. In this section each possible implementation is explained, and motivation is given on how to include it in the game, or why it was not included.
 
 
Progression system
 
As the name suggests, the progression system is a system where users are rewarded for exercising in the form of progression in a certain system. This can range from simply gaining points or leveling up to collecting fictional characters. This system encourages users through extrinsic motivation with rewards, to improve engagement, while also raising feelings of achieving mastery, autonomy, sense of belonging as intrinsic motivation [1].  
 
The most important decisions to be made are what kind of progression system is to be used, how difficult should this system be, how often should rewards be given and should punishments be used as well?
 
As there isn’t a clear best progression system, we decided that it would be most optimal to investigate what the consumer would prefer through a survey and decide based on that.  
 
“People with high motivation to succeed prefer tasks of intermediate difficulty. However, if the motive to avoid failure is stronger people prefer either very simple or very difficult tasks” [1]. As our app is used to succeed in exercising regularly, most users should possess a motivation to succeed instead of a motivation to not fail. As such we will implement tasks of intermediate difficulty based on users' previous data.  
 
'''“Use (Randomly) an Intermittent Reward Timing (RIRT)'''. This is the most powerful schedule for dopamine release and '''staying motivated'''. The casinos use it to take people’s money. It works 100% of the time. You can use RIRT to your advantage, to stay motivated in any pursuit. The key is to '''celebrate your wins, but do not celebrate every win'''”[2]. Sources suggest that the most efficient way of handing out rewards is by making the random and unpredictable. To implement this, a random chance for a bonus multiplier on normal exercise rewards could be given. It could be considered to make this random bonus influenced by how much a user has been exercising, so that extra effort is rewarded. This could be further discussed in the future.  The normal exercise rewards are handed out when a user completes a set of exercises, specifically when they complete a full schedule.  Additionally extra rewards could be handed out for consistency, but this will be discussed in the section for consistency rewards.  These rewards are always handed out instead of using RIRT as these are the cornerstone of the progression system.  
 
“We compared the perceived effectiveness of Reward and Punishment quantitatively and found that ''Reward strategies can engage users and make behaviour fun, reinforce commitments to goals, reveal some consequences of bad behaviour, and their tendency to redirect behaviour intention and trivialise the consequences of bad behaviour''. In contrast, ''Punishment strategies can be depressing, discouraging, and demoralising; therefore, elements of Punishment must be strategically implemented in the persuasive gamified systems, especially those targeted at health behaviours''”[3]. Given this risk of using punishments when targeting health behaviors, we decided that it would be better to not implement them as the risk of using them is not worth the possible positive effect they could have, especially since we don’t have a lot of experience on how to strategically implement them.  
 
 
 
Multiplayer
 
This implementation is all about using cooperation and/or competition to inspire more motivation in the users. This can be done through teams, rankings, challenges between individuals, challenges between teams, communal goals and the like. According to sources the combination of cooperation and competition is most effective at motivation [4]. To ensure more certainty, we have decided to inquire about this in the survey to ensure the correct choice is made. Based on the results a decision will be made in the future.
 
 
Motivational messages/reminders
 
According to [5], personality and sex of a user are relevant for the effectiveness of messages with a certain tone. Generally, the most effective tone is positive and cooperative. Given the difference per user, we decided to obtain opinions from the users by including it in the survey and by allowing a user to choose between a few different tones which were preferred the most according to the survey. The positive and cooperative tone will most likely be used as the default of the options.
 
 
Consistency system
 
A consistency system is a way of rewarding users for consistently doing something. Examples of this are streaks in snapchat, daily logins for a week but also for example car insurance, where the longer you do not claim something the less you have to pay. According to [6], these systems are relatively effective at creating habits and as such are certainly something we would want to implement. In our case such a system will work weekly, where the user will get a progressively increasing multiplier to rewards, they get from doing exercises. In is not daily since many cannot exercise every day and it is not longer than weekly since exercise should be done regularly [7].
 
 
Exercise schedule
 
Our app could assist users by giving them an exercise schedule to refer to while in the gym to ensure that they perform a well-rounded routine fitting to their goal. Whether such a schedule should be static or flexible will be determined from the survey results. Examples of a flexible schedule would be suggestions through which the user can construct a schedule themselves or a given schedule could be adapted by allowing users to veto an exercise and receive a different one of the same type. Also, the reason for each user going to the gym is used to steer the exercise schedule creation.
 
 
Sources:
 
[1] Studying Gamification: The Effect of Rewards and Incentives on Motivation | SpringerLink
 
[2] Tools to Manage Dopamine and Improve Motivation & Drive - Huberman Lab
 
[3] Towards understanding the mechanism through which reward and punishment motivate or demotivate behav (tandfonline.com)
 
[4] The Effects of Cooperation and Competition on Intrinsic Motivation and Performance. (apa.org)
 
[5] A word of advice: how to tailor motivational text messages based on behavior change theory to personality and gender | Personal and Ubiquitous Computing (springer.com)
 
[6] Effectiveness of Loyalty Programs in Customer Retention: A Multiple Mediation Analysis - Andy Chin Woon Fook, Omkar Dastane, 2021 (sagepub.com)
 
[7] Regular physical exercise: way to healthy life. - Abstract - Europe PMC
 
 
'''Motivation:''' When exploring students’ motivation, the majority were extrinsically motivated.  Only three students reported exercising for the inherent pleasure or satisfaction of it (intrinsic motivation). When asked why he chose to exercise one student replied, “I just like it, I don’t really care about the weight part I just like exercise.” A majority of students (79%, n = 19) were found to be motivated via identified regulation. Students chose to engage in activities because they deemed them valuable and a necessary component of achieving an external goal such as weight loss or improved health. As one student responded, “Um just to stay healthy, don’t get overweight, you know, I don’t know, just feel good about myself.” Another student explained, Well couple of things,  first of all it’s good for you.  So my  Grandma, died of a heart attack and I wasn’t sure if like it was because she was a little heavier than she should be for her height. So that was just one thing like in order to have a good heart you need to eat healthy and exercise which is stuff she didn’t do, and then another reason is I’m trying to lose weight in like my stomach and legs so I figured exercising is good
 
'''Results:''' The most commonly  reported  motives  for  exercise  were,  to  gain  strength  and  endurance (M = 4.50, SD =.14), to have positive health (M = 4.46, SD =.15), and weight management (M = 4.09, SD =.18)
 
'''Discussion:''' Regarding exercise motivation,  the survey and interview results concur,  college students meeting ACSM exercise recommendations were most commonly motivated via identified regulation,  the second most autonomous form of extrinsic motivation. This indicates students were motivated by a self-determining behavior (e.g., improved looks, weight loss, health). Previous literature has found identified regulation to be a key indicator of initiation and short-term exercise adherence  (Markland, 1999). These findings did not differ based on size or gender. This is contrary to another research study that found females were more likely to participate in campus recreation services due to less self-determined extrinsic motivators (Cooper et al., 2012). Interestingly, one of the top extrinsic motives for exercise regardless of weight or gender was a desire to improve strength and endurance. This differs from previous findings that have found strength and endurance to be a more common motive among males but not females (Kilpatrick et al., 2005)
 
'''Conclusion:''' This study found college students meeting ACSM exercise recommendations were primarily motivated by external factors (e.g., to look good) rather than inherent intrinsic factors (e.g., enjoyment). In addition, the study determined the type of motivation does not differ by BMI or gender. The results of this study suggest college students who are meeting  ACSM  exercise recommendations chose to engage in exercise primarily due to external reasons. These reasons do not vary based on gender or size and therefore should be considered an effective approach for targeting a broad scope of college students. Future interventions should be targeted within campus recreation programs and focus on developing innovative solutions for helping students maintain their exercise regimen as well as strategies to enhance to social support and competence to engage in a variety of modes of exercise.
 
Link: <nowiki>https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1123/rsj.2017-0026</nowiki>  
 
The most important take away from this article is:
 
This suggests that the way difficulty is measured is important for our understanding of motivation.  
 
Link: <nowiki>https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11218-011-9157-z</nowiki>
 
=== '''<big>State-of-the-art</big>'''   ===
<nowiki>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irMJLcmSG5k</nowiki>
 
This is a youtube video of the 10 best fitness apps for 2023. It gives an explanation of what you can get out of each app  
 
Nike training club – Free
 
* It differentiates based on different muscle groups. Each exercise showcases a short video of how the exercise is done.
* There are also follow along workouts in which you train with a personal trainer.
 
Adidas training – Free, but there is a premium version
 
* It also has video clips of the the exercises.  
* There are also follow along workouts in which you train with a personal trainer.
* You can filter exercises based on focus, difficulty, time, etc. This way it is very easy for you to personalize a training program.
 
Home workout – paid  
 
* It is body goal-oriented. It will tell you how long it takes you to finish your goal
* Daily tracker, in which you can see all the movements you have done that day and you can log the amount of calories you have eaten and the amount of water you drank.  
 
Muscle booster – paid  
 
* You are given a plan to follow based on your goals.
* It gives a video demonstration of the exercise.
* There is no audio support
* There is a workout and exercise database, where all of the exercises are stored based on the muscle group.
* There is also a whole section on meal plans. That offers various recipes based on your diet.  
 
 
Peloton – Paid  
 
* You have access to many different trainers that guide you to your goals.  
* You can filter based on class type and the trainer will guide you throughout the whole workout.  
* You have also access to live classes
* You do not have to own a peloton device, you can also do yoga for example or strength training.
 
Apple fitness plus
 
* You can follow along workouts given by a personal trainer.
* There is a variety of things you can do like running, gym, etc.
* However, you need to own an apple watch.
* You also have a walk with me feature, where you listen to famous people talking to you about things.
 
Fitbod – Paid  
 
* This app is mostly based on strength training.
* It has a feature in which you can filter what equipment you have available (The most extensive list)
* Each exercise is not only followed by a video of the exercise, but it is also explained in great detail, and you can see exactly what muscle groups the exercise targets.
 
Aaptiv – Paid  


* This is an app that is audio based.  
* You have access to a wide range of exercises in many different categories.  
* You can filter based on equipment available, body parts, etc.
* Some exercises do not have a video of how it is done, but others will have it. What is important is that all of the exercises are also audio-recorded. So, even if you do not see the exercise you are still guided through it.  


FitOn – Free but with premium
'''The progression systems are ranked as follows:'''


* During all the workouts, you train with a personal trainer.  
* Character level up (53.2%)
* If you do not want to listen to the trainer, you can upgrade to premium and listen to songs.  
* “wins” over other players (43.2%)
* Premium includes: music, meal plans, connects wearable devices(fitbit).  
* Gaining currency/Exp (36.9%)
* Power levels (32.4%)  
* Character gathering and leveling (29.7%)


Centr – Paid  


* There are many different styles of workouts to choose from
'''The character creation systems are ranked as follows:'''
* There are follow along guided workout videos and some guided exercises.
* You have the ability to filter based on time and equipment.  
* There is also a whole section on meals  


* Humans (57.7%)
* Animals (40.5%)
* Fantasy creatures (31.5%)
* Hybrids (15.3%)


<nowiki>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7510592/</nowiki>  


As a diverse field of research that is related to an emerging phenomenon, and with the integration of new technologies, the research available on fitness apps is still scarce. Both empirical research and theoretical orientation reviews, mostly focus on summarizing the functions and features of fitness apps and user perspectives. As a result, there appears to be a lack of more macro and objective quantitative research in this field. And the various types of literature are not as substantial or abundant compared to other mature areas of research.  
The results of the first questionnaire helped with designing a rough sketch of the app.     


Well, why would we want a new fitness app? The high rate of obesity is one of the most worrying factors for health globally according to the article. Even nowadays it is perceived that children have a high risk of obesity. That is why a healthy lifestyle is recommended for all age groups. This can be done by following a balanced diet and exercise. Using a mobile fitness app is a modern way to ensure that people reach their fitness goals. However, clinicians still lack confidence in the protocols provided by these applications, but due to the wide availability of users. Mobile fitness apps can become very effective and boost healthy habits at a low cost.  
[[File:Louise pic 1.jpg|left|thumb|425x425px|Initial sketches Louise]]
[[File:Roel pic 1.jpg|thumb|645x645px|Initial sketches Roel]]


Most of the research done in this topic is conducted through experiments and the country that contributes the most to this area is the United States.  


Based on the generalization of all the information obtained and the review of the abstract and some of the full text, we found that the performance and function of fitness apps, the benefits for chronic disease treatment, the influence of using fitness app for public health, and factors of motivations of using fitness apps are currently popular research topics in this field. Future research could build on these directions and incorporate relevant issues from a social science perspective (e.g., consumer motivations, consumer engagement, consumer behavior, etc.) to further investigate on fitness applications.


<nowiki>https://www.makeuseof.com/apps-gamify-fitness-routine/</nowiki>  


This link shows 5 fitness apps that use a gamified function in their app.  




''PlayFitt''


• In-game avatars that move, grow and celebrate right along with you


• Build your movement social circle to nudge, gift and stay motivated with friends


• The easiest way to make 21 minutes of daily exercise a habit—the clinically proven amount of exercise you need every day to live a longer, happier, healthy life
[[File:Geert pic 2.jpg|thumb|514x514px|Initial sketches Geert]]


• Compete for top spot on league leaderboards and beat your buddies on friends leaderboards


• Hassle-free and hands-free automatic rep counting for dance, steps, stairs, squats, push-ups and more


• Streaks and streak rewards to keep you motivated longer
[[File:Geert pic 1.jpg|left|thumb|342x342px|Initial sketches Geert 2]]


• Movement goals that automatically adapt to your progress and form lasting habits


• Simple and fun exercise games that reverse the harmful effects of sitting all day


• Full Apple Watch and HealthKit integration




''Hops – journey of tree spirit''
[[File:Thijn pic 1.jpg|thumb|Initial sketches Thijn|center]]


- Explore the beautiful forests with cute Hops


- Get traveling energy by achieving daily goals


- Get crafting materials from your steps


- Change outfits and get cool effects


- Collect Friends by completing missions
[[File:Daan 1.jpg|thumb|Initial sketches Daan 1]]
[[File:Daan 3.jpg|left|thumb|Initial sketches Daan 3|461x461px]]
[[File:Screens of GUI.png|left|thumb|431x431px|Initial sketches Chris]]
[[File:Daan 2.jpg|center|thumb|Initial sketches Daan 2]]
[[File:App-design-web.jpg|thumb|600x600px|Initial connection web for the app|center]]


- Glanceable recent activities and stats
[[File:Roel pic 2.jpg|thumb|398x398px|1st design Competition]]                   


- Measure Walking workouts
After the sketches were discussed, an app was developed with keeping in mind the preferences of the surveys and our own preferences. The following screens were developed:                      [[File:Louise pic 2.jpg|left|thumb|1st design settings & notifications]]
[[File:Chris pic 1.jpg|center|thumb|517x517px|1st design Workout]]
[[File:Thijn pic 3.jpg|left|thumb|422x422px|1st design homescreen]]
[[File:Daan total 3.jpg|thumb|1st design reward wheel]]
[[File:Geert 7.jpg|center|thumb|465x465px|1st design Friend list]]




''Treeceps''  


1.) Get strong and build muscle with highly effective workouts
Since we worked on the screens separately, the designs were quite different from each other, especially the colors. So, after discussing the each other's designs we settled on a style that would best fit the app. Here are a few examples of the result:       


• Train at home or in the gym by choosing your equipment
[[File:Fusion 1.jpg|left|thumb|597x597px|Altered color design 1]]
[[File:Fusion 2.jpg|thumb|409x409px|Altered color design 2|center]]


• No experience required: Treeceps will teach you how to perform real, effective strength training, rep by rep


• If you’re new to strength training: Let the artificial intelligence create the perfect plan, based on your time, equipment and goals


• For experienced lifters: Create your own routine and track it in the world of Treeceps
After this the feedback from the focus group was implemented. The feedback points were:  


• High quality 3D animations (female + male) show exactly how exercises should be performed
They were all unanimous about which colour scheme fits the app the best, namely the blue one. There was someone who pointed out that having the option to select different colours would be nice, on which the others agreed. They would also like the character to be less muscular, because that might be discouraging for someone who is not as fit. Additionally, they would like the possibility to select a female character as well and they want the character to show progression when they level up. The attendees liked our layout and thought the app was clear, but they would like to have more options when you go to the cardio workout, so not only running but also for example riding a bike or swimming. They would also like the option to fulfill personal goals and the ability to time workouts.  


• Receive science based tips for your training by Dr. Fox
Both focus groups liked our app more than regular fitness apps, which is mainly due to the competition element in our app. They did notice that our calendar was a bit minimalistic and should be worked out better. Furthermore, both groups thought that our app would be less accessible for beginners. They suggested adding videos on how certain exercises work and adding more instructions about how to create workouts. They would like the app to save the reps they had done in the previous workout, so that you would not have to worry about this element. Additionally, someone mentioned that it would be nice to add certain exercises based on specific parts of the body.  


• Easy to use workout tracker that guides you through your training in a way like no other app does
The focus group attendees were a bit divided about the point system. They mostly agreed on getting points after the workout is completed. Consistency is imported, so if you make progressions, you should get more points. Someone also said that a more difficult workout should receive more points than an easier one.  


• Advanced features such as 3D muscle utilization visualization, detailed workload and fatigue estimation per muscle group, RPE tracking, progress statistics, progression suggestions and much more
There was one more thing on which everyone agreed, namely that you should not get notifications during a workout, because that would distract and be annoying. Someone mentioned that it would be nice to get a message when a record is broken but is not necessary. They like the streak, but do not want notifications about it. Everyone mentioned that it would be nice to be able to text friends and to chat within a team. It would be appreciated to get certain motivational notifications once a week.  


2.) Be active and get lean by increasing your daily activity


• Your steps in the real world produce grass and feed Runimals
This resulted in the creation or modification of the following screens:
[[File:Feedback 1.jpg|thumb|Change rewards]]


• Grow flowers and unlock Runimals through fitness achievements


• Climb flights of stairs and grow your lighthouse
'''Rewards for spinning wheel:'''


• An immersive world, influenced by your activity, with simulated daytime and weather effects
SUPER WORKOUT: Your character earns double XP by completing a bonus workout session, leading to a significant boost in experience points.


• Receive humorous weather forecasts to find out the perfect moment to go for a walk
NUTRITION BOOST: Your character wins a package of nutritious snacks and supplements, enhancing their overall fitness and providing a small XP boost for their next 3 gym sessions.


• Be prepared for many surprises along the way Treeceps is available exclusively for Apple devices, build from the ground up with latest Apple technologies.  
BUDDY MOTIVATION: Your character receives motivational support from a gym buddy, inspiring them to push harder during their next workout and earning them bonus XP for their next gym session together.  


• Metal based rendering provides an immersive world with simulated daytime, weather, incredible lighting effects and detailed exercise animations
GOOD GUIDANCE: Your character receives personalized training advice from a virtual personal trainer, resulting in improved technique and increased XP gains for the next workout.


• iCloud sync allows you to collect steps and stairs on your iOS devices or Apple Watch during the day and admire your progress on your Mac at home
VIP GYM ACCESS: Your character gains access to an exclusive VIP section of the gym, complete with premium equipment and amenities, motivating them to return for their next workout and earn extra XP.


• Game Center leader boards let you compete against your friends with your own fitness achievements
WELLNESS RETREAT PACKAGE: Your character wins a package to attend a wellness retreat focused on rejuvenation and self-care. This opportunity to relax and recharge in a serene environment inspires your character to prioritize their health and well-being, motivating them to return to the gym feeling refreshed and ready to tackle their next workout with renewed enthusiasm, resulting in enhanced XP gains as they continue to progress on their fitness journey.


• Support for the latest macOS features such as automatic Dark Mode, You are Not able to create your own exercises.  
The golden spinning wheel is just when you have reached a certain level, the points for the next workout will either be doubled, tripled, or quadrupled.  


[[File:Feedback 4.jpg|thumb|Female character addition]]
[[File:Feedback 2.jpg|left|thumb|Customizability changes]]
[[File:Feedback 3.jpg|center|thumb|394x394px|One of the different colour options]]
[[File:Feedback 5.jpg|left|thumb|354x354px|More detailed cardio]]
[[File:Feedback 6.jpg|thumb|Xp reward]]
[[File:Feedback 8.jpg|left|thumb|361x361px|More detailed calendar]]
[[File:Feedback 7.jpg|center|thumb|Chat for team and changeable duration of competition|324x324px]]
[[File:Feedback 9.jpg|thumb|Trophies]]
[[File:Feedback 11.jpg|left|thumb|641x641px|Part of added tutorial]]
[[File:Feedback 10.jpg|center|thumb|523x523px|Friend chat]]


''Nerd Fitness journey''


The Journey is a self guided choose your own adventure experience where you build habits at the pace the app sets for you. It has different nutrition, mindset, and fitness goals to choose from, which include bite-sized story elements along the way as you complete missions, build your superhero persona, tackle boss battles, and build real-life healthy habits.  
[[File:App-design-web 2.jpg|thumb|559x559px|Final connection web app]]




''Fitness RPG''


KEY FEATURES:


<nowiki>*</nowiki> Fitness RPG - Convert your steps into free energy and use them to level up heroes


<nowiki>*</nowiki> Sync steps - Uses steps from your phone or sync steps from your Fitbit
Once the feedback from the focus group was implemented in the app. It was time for a final survey and some interviews.  


<nowiki>*</nowiki> Battlegrounds - Explore the Fitland map, fight monsters and save the kingdom
The results from the last survey were as follows:  


<nowiki>*</nowiki> Team of heroes - Collect and train different heroes, form your ace team
Number of survey participants: 30


<nowiki>*</nowiki> Precious equipment and skins - Collect, upgrade precious weapons to make your team stronger


<nowiki>*</nowiki> Arena - Compete with other players and fight your way to the top
'''General'''


90 % has completed the first survey


Maybe look into how obesity is linked to students and if we can find a source that says that students with obesity or not per se obesity, but just lazy people are more likely to sit inside and play video games we can say that creating an application that incorporates both movement and gaming can help motivate this category.  
26,7% Uses already a fitness app, 73,3% doesn’t so there could be potential for our app


<nowiki>https://shakuro.com/blog/fitness-app-gamification-in-2021-a-trend-you-cant-miss</nowiki>  
Most of the users are tired of classic fitness coach app ideas and looking for something that will motivate them more. Games are one of the basic forms to engage people in various activities since childhood.
Doing some research into the reviews of the apps mentioned above, it is perceived that some of the apps still have bugs in them that some users point out. Also, doing some research I can see that the apps mentioned above do not really have the features that we are trying to add. Some apps only do tracking, others also have workout plans and videos that help with performing the exercise. Furthermore, there are apps that have built a whole world in which you can navigate. However, have not found an app that really gives you the opportunity to change your avatar according to how far you have come in your fitness journey. Some apps do offer customization options like changing clothes. However, I have not come across an app that will let you grow muscles and that also works.
Also, a lot of the apps have avatars that do not look like humans. So, that is also different from our idea.
The initial results also show a noteworthy adoption of gamification in specific mobile fitness apps, where a considerable number of smartphone users exploit the gamification mechanics applied (Souza-Júnior et al., 2016). In specific, walking, running and weight loss apps top the list, thus, more research studies should be undertaken and even more customized m-services need be developed focusing on these activities with the aim to satisfy every single m-health app user as much as possible. Concerning gamification mechanics, challenges followed by achievement badges, competition and scoreboards seem to lure much more users to utilize these apps. According to the literature review, gamification can strengthen individuals’ internal motives with the aim to change and improve their health behavior. Therefore, it goes without saying that gamification is expected to be incorporated even more on mobile fitness apps in the near future. Especially developers who take advantage of the behavioral theories that link psychological impact with gamification mechanics are expected to have even more prosperous prospects.  
<nowiki>https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-24294-6_24</nowiki>  
'''State of the art study:'''
In order to improve on the already existing apps it is important to understand the applications that are currently available. The goal of our app is to motivate people to exercise more. This can be done by applying behavior change theory on a fitness app. One very popular way to keep users engaged is to gamify the app. This will generally improve the interaction between the user and the app. However according to a study in 2016 only 4% of fitness apps applied any use of gamification (Edwards et al., 2016).  
´Behaviour change categories used were: feedback and monitoring (n=60, 94% of apps), reward and threat (n=52, 81%), and goals and planning (n=52, 81%). Individual techniques were: self-monitoring of behaviour (n=55, 86%), non-specific reward (n=49, 82%), social support unspecified (n=48, 75%), non-specific incentive (n=49, 82%) and focus on past success (n=47, 73%). Median number of techniques per app was 14 (range: 5–22). Common combinations were: goal setting, self-monitoring, non-specific reward and non-specific incentive (n=35, 55%); goal setting, self-monitoring and focus on past success (n=33, 52%).’ (Edwards et al., 2016)
This can then be further divided into the specific gamification aspects used by these apps as seen above.  
Another more recent study in 2019 analyzed 212352 health and fitness apps of these apps it was found that about 5018 could be considered gamified. However a mere 344 were truly classified as behavior change apps. This is a shocking 0.16% of all ‘health’ apps. This study didn’t just look at fitness/exercise apps but also at apps to help stop smoking or to eat healthier. The 344 behavior change apps were then further analyzed to check their effectiveness. Two scales were used on the first scale the apps scored an average of 2.93 out of 5. And on a one point per criteria scale the highest scored was 17 out of 21 with an average of 7.8 . This indicates that even though a lot of fitness apps exist they severely lack a strong foundation of behavior change theory (McKay et al., 2019). Our app could set itself apart by including some true behavior change theory. With especially crucial things like social support being only used by 3% of all apps (Edwards et al., 2016). According to an older study this can be attributed to the fact that app developers come from a variety of backgrounds. They often lack the Theory to base their apps upon. So if we want to improve on these apps we should use behavior change theory to expand on the existing foundations of the apps that are currently available.
This literature research mostly provided knowledge on the lack of behavior change theory in fitness apps. Combining the knowledge of what the apps seems to lack now, what the users want the app to contain (through surveys) and what behavior change theory says should work could create a more stimulating fitness app.
McKay, F. H., Wright, A., Shill, J., Stephens, H., & Uccellini, M. (2019). Using Health and Well-Being Apps for Behavior Change: A Systematic search and Rating of apps. ''Jmir Mhealth and Uhealth'', ''7''(7), e11926. <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.2196/119264</nowiki>
Edwards, E., Lumsden, J., Rivas, C., Steed, L., Edwards, L., Thiyagarajan, A., Sohanpal, R., Caton, H., Griffiths, C., Munafò, M. R., Taylor, S. J. C., & Walton, R. (2016). Gamification for health promotion: systematic review of behaviour change techniques in smartphone apps. ''BMJ Open'', ''6''(10), e012447. <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012447</nowiki>
Cowan, L., Van Wagenen, S. A., Brown, B. A., Hedin, R. J., Seino-Stephan, Y., Hall, P. C., & West, J. H. (2012). Apps of Steel: Are exercise apps providing consumers with realistic expectations? ''Health Education & Behavior'', ''40''(2), 133–139. <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198112452126</nowiki>
=== '''<big>Questionnaire 1 results</big>''' ===
Link questionnaire: https://forms.gle/ZRBihpS5EVGqeqFLA
N = 113


'''Personal identification'''  
'''Personal identification'''  


39.8% female, 57.5% male, 2.7% other
50% female, 50% male  


Average age is 19.76, ranging from 17 to 24
Average age is 20, ranging from 19 to 21


94.7% is a Student  
100% is a Student  




'''Current exercise situation'''  
'''Tutorial'''  


Average frequency of exercise is about 3 times a week (When considering “more than 5” as 6.5)
The tutorial is clear for 86,6 %


About 70%(69.9%) would like to exercise more
Other comments 13,4 %:  


2/3 of all participants would like to do strength training, 44.1% would like to do Hypertrophy and 68,5% would like to do cardiovascular training.
* Background music or voice-over as tutorial  
* Black arrows blend in with background


61.9% is interested in using an app for exercise motivation


64.2% does not currently use a tracking/fitness app
'''Competing against others'''


 
Everyone 100% would use the feature, only 1 person mentioned that they wouldn’t use the chat option (separate form chat question)  
'''App shape'''
 
Option 1(lightblue and gray) is the most popular (55.8%), others don’t get higher than 22.1%. Around 10% is displeased with all concepts.
 
Preferred tones are Funny (56.8%) and Considering (43.2%)
 
 
'''Multiplayer'''
 
Competing against other people is endorsed by 73.5%
 
Of those who want multiplayer:
 
94,4% would like to compete against friends
 
80,6% would like to compete against others
 
(note that the amount of people that replied varies, with n=90 and n=93 respectively, this is also not representative with the original 73.5%, showing that on average about 9 people answered against multiplayer, but still gave feedback on its creation)  




'''Push notifications'''  
'''Push notifications'''  


About 70% (69.6%) would like to receive motivational push notifications  
Would like to receive motivational push notifications 86,6%


Only 38,4% would like to receive notifications about in game events or other-player progression.
Who wouldn’t 13,4%  


Other comments: - Receiving messages that friends have been going to the gym, would be nice


'''Program creation'''
               


78,4% would like to make their own exercise program


88,4% would like to receive a program, based on their goals
'''Avatars / characters'''


On a scale from 1 to 5, the preferred customizability is 3.7 (2.7 if 0 to 4)
Likes the avatars 70%


Tracking in between exercises is possible for 85.7%  
Comments for improvement (30%):


On a scale from 1 to 5, the willingness to have predetermined exercise times is 2.25 (1.25 if 0 to 4)  
* Could be body shaming (look too perfect the characters) (make more realistic avatars)
* More diversity
* Show progression in the character (own progression)  
* Too big changes in artstyle between the characters
* Character must be customisable




'''The progression systems are ranked as follows;'''  
'''Home screen:'''  


# Character level up (53.2%)
Home screen approval 96,7%  


# “wins” over other players (43.2%)  
Other comment: - In leadership widget not only your own position but also the number 1 (leader)  


# Gaining currency/Exp (36.9%)


# Power levels (32.4%)
'''Motivation for wheel:'''


# Character gathering and leveling (29.7%)
Motivation is good enough to keep exercising 80%  


Other 20% thinks not or didn’t understand the question right


'''The character creation systems are ranked as follows;'''


# Humans (57.7%)
'''Ranking friend list:'''


# Animals(40.5%)
Find ranking among friends a good idea 89,9 %  


# Fantasy creatures(31.5%)
No good idea or other comment:


# Hybrids(15.3%)
* Making it optional for each user separately
* Can also be demotivating




Excel sheet with all the data should still be added to the Appendix
'''Chat function:'''


=== App development ===
Would use this chat feature 66,6%
To develop the app further, we looked at how other apps work and whether we could take inspiration for our app from this. We also worked on the app itself using the figma programme. Photos of our current progression of the app will be added below.


Progress week 1:
Wouldn’t use it 33,4% (Most people just use alternative chat apps like WhatsApp)
[[File:App progress week 1.png|left|thumb|App progress week 1]]
[[File:Logo app transparent.png|none|thumb|Logo app]]




'''Choose of app:'''


60% of the people who already uses a fitness app would prefer our app instead of their current app.




'''Grade for all-round motivation of app:'''
[[File:Results 1.jpg|thumb|659x659px|Results Grade|none]]






== Discussion ==
App limitations:


During the app development we ran into a couple of problems with the features that were meant to be in the app. Thus, some of these features are only cosmetic in our design as having these truly work would require a functional app linked to a server with multiple users. Fully developing the app would also allow us to test how well the app works on the long term. In the limited time of this project it was impossible to fully develop the app. The team consisted of no one with prior knowledge of app development. This complicated the evaluation part of our app so a last feedback round consisting of interviews and a questionnaire had to do. Ideally the app would be evaluated through a trial in which a group of subjects would be split in three groups one group would use no app, another group would use a different state of the art gamified fitness app and the last group would use shapeshifters. Their fitness progress and motivation would be collected over at least a month and preferably longer.




Evaluation:


The last round of feedback gave an insight into how well the app functions and gives the ability to evaluate the app design. The feedback was collected through a questionnaire which had 30 responses and 4 interviews conducted with participants from the focus group.  




Tutorial:


The tutorial is clear and explains every facet of the app. According to the feedback from the form ~90% said that the tutorial was well explained. The other 10% mentioned partly that even though it was clear the tutorial was too long and there is no way to opt out. The feedback from the interviews also relays this information all participants said that the tutorial was clear but just too long which meant that at the end they were distracted.  


Competition:


With the competition being the main feature that sets shapeshifters apart from other apps this is an integral part of the evaluation. The result from the questionnaire showed that 29 out of 30 people were excited about this feature. The interviews also show that this is something that people think is a big motivator. One of the responses was that it resembles Duolingo where you have daily rankings and that the interviewee found that very motivating.  


Ranking friend list:


The survey shows that 90% found this to be a great idea. The other 10% mentioned that it could also be demotivating for someone that just started. As some of your friends could have such a high score that you could never beat them. So this could perhaps be solved by a simple on and off switch that allows users to show the trophies of your friends or not.




Week 2:
Chat function:  
[[File:App progress week 2.png|left|thumb|App progress week 2]]
 
 


This feature was implemented after the feedback from the focus group. The chat function allows chatting with friends and your teammates. This shows as the interviews showed that this was good that it was finally implemented. The questionnaire gave quite a mixed response with 2/3 of the responses saying they would use this function the other 1/3 said this was a redundant feature as they would just keep using other apps like WhatsApp for communication with friends.  


Overall:


Reactions from the interviews were positive. The subjects said that they would use the app. With as only feedback that it is not as applicable to other sports. So someone who boxes will not have full use out of the app. The questionnaire showed that 60% of people who already use a fitness app would use Shapeshifters instead of the one they use now. Subjects were also asked to rate the app on how motivating they thought it would be on a scale of 1-10. The mode of these reactions is 7 and the mean is 7.3.


It would be nice to see the app fully developed and functional in the future. This could lead to a much butter analyzation of the app and whether it works.


== References   ==
Bonnie, R. J., Stroud, C., Breiner, H. (2015, 27 januari). Investing in The Health And Well-Being Of Young Adults - ''NCBI Bookshelf.'' https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK284776/


Cowan, L., Van Wagenen, S. A., Brown, B. A., Hedin, R. J., Seino-Stephan, Y., Hall, P. C., & West, J. H. (2012). Apps of Steel: Are exercise apps providing consumers with realistic expectations? ''Health Education & Behavior'', ''40''(2), 133–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198112452126


De Vries, R., Truong, K. P., Zaga, C., Li, J., & Evers, V. (2017). A word of advice: how to tailor motivational text messages based on behavior change theory to personality and gender. ''Personal And Ubiquitous Computing'', ''21''(4), 675–687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-017-1025-1


Edwards, E., Lumsden, J., Rivas, C., Steed, L., Edwards, L., Thiyagarajan, A., Sohanpal, R., Caton, H., Griffiths, C., Munafò, M. R., Taylor, S. J. C., & Walton, R. (2016). Gamification for health promotion: systematic review of behaviour change techniques in smartphone apps. ''BMJ Open'', ''6''(10), e012447. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012447


Egli, T. J., Bland, H. W., Melton, B. F., & Czech, D. R. (2011). Influence of Age, Sex, and Race on College Students’ Exercise Motivation of Physical Activity. ''Journal Of American College Health'', ''59''(5), 399–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2010.513074


Fook, A. C. W., & Dastane, O. (2021). Effectiveness of Loyalty Programs in Customer Retention: A Multiple Mediation Analysis. Jindal Journal of Business Research, 10(1), 7-32. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/22786821211000182


Hao, W., & Chuen-Tsai, S. (2011). Game reward systems: gaming experiences and social meanings. ''DiGRA.'' http://www.digra.org/digital-library/publications/game-reward-systems-gaming-experiences-and-social-meanings/  


Huberman, A. (2022, 6 October). ''Tools to Manage Dopamine and Improve Motivation & Drive''. https://www.hubermanlab.com/newsletter/tools-to-manage-dopamine-and-improve-motivation-and-drive


Jansen, B. J. (1998). The graphical user interface. ''SIGCHI Bulletin'', ''30''(2), 22–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/279044.279051


Kachan, D. (2021, 10 december). Principles of Color Psychology in Mobile Application Design. ''Medium''. https://medium.com/sketch-app-sources/principles-of-color-psychology-in-mobile-application-design-8d338144ffff


KevTheTrainer. (2022, 1 januari). ''10 Best Fitness Apps for 2023 (Peloton, FitOn, Muscle Booster and More!)'' [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irMJLcmSG5k


Liu, Y., & Avello, M. (2021). Status of the research in fitness apps: A bibliometric analysis. ''Telematics And Informatics'', ''57'', 101506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101506


Mack, L. E. (2023, 24 mei). ''5 apps that gamify your fitness routine''. MUO. https://www.makeuseof.com/apps-gamify-fitness-routine/


McKay, F. H., Wright, A., Shill, J., Stephens, H., & Uccellini, M. (2019). Using Health and Well-Being Apps for Behavior Change: A Systematic search and Rating of apps. ''Jmir Mhealth and Uhealth'', ''7''(7). https://doi.org/10.2196/119264


Nielsen, G. L., Wikman, J. M., Jensen, C. J., Schmidt, J. F., Gliemann, L., & Andersen, T. F. (2014). Health promotion: The impact of beliefs of health benefits, social relations and enjoyment on exercise continuation. ''Scandinavian Journal Of Medicine & Science in Sports'', ''24''(S1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12275


Orji, R., Alslaity, A., & Chan, G. (2023). Towards understanding the mechanism through which reward and punishment motivate or demotivate behaviours. ''Behavior & Information Technology,'' 1– 25. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0144929X.2023.2196582  


Richter, G., Raban, D. R., & Rafaeli, S. (2014). Studying gamification: The effect of rewards and incentives on motivation. In ''Springer eBooks (''pp. 21–46). https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-10208-5_2  


Schweinle, A., & Helming, L. M. (2011). Success and motivation among college students. ''Social Psychology Of Education'', ''14''(4), 529–546. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11218-011-9157-z


Siddiqui, NI., Nessa, A., & Hossain, MA. (2010) Regular physical exercise: way to healthy life ''Mymensingh medical journal'' (pp. 154–158). https://europepmc.org/article/med/20046192  


Snyder, K., Lee, J. M., Bjornsen, A., & Dinkel, D. (2017). What Gets Them Moving? College Students’ Motivation for Exercise: An Exploratory Study. Recreational Sports Journal, 41(2), 111-124. https://doi.org/10.1123/rsj.2017-0026


Suh, A., Wagner, C., & Liu, H. (2016). Enhancing User Engagement through Gamification. ''Journal Of Computer Information Systems'', ''58''(3), 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2016.1229143


Tauer, J. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2004). The Effects of Cooperation and Competition on Intrinsic Motivation and Performance. ''Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86''(6), 849–861. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.849


Wang, H., & Sun, C. T. (2011, September). Game reward systems: Gaming experiences and social meanings. In ''DiGRA conference'' (Vol. 114). https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=d850269a6e95214c6212c6402d06edb918f35db9




Line 1,126: Line 1,010:
|}
|}


== Sources: ==
== Log: ==
Literature found week 1:
 
Louise:  
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|'''Link:'''  
|'''Week 1'''  
|'''Content:'''  
|'''Total hours'''
|'''Tasks done (incl. hours per task)'''  
|-
|-
|<nowiki>https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11218-011-9157-z</nowiki>  
|Geert Boer
|This article is mostly about motivation among students. It does not touch on exercise, but it does discuss that not only the goals of the students are important, but also whether the goals are reached.  
|7h
|Lecture and meeting (3.5h), finding literature (1h), second meeting (1.5h), app research (1h)
|-
|-
|<nowiki>https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1123/rsj.2017-0026</nowiki>  
|Roel Domensino
|This article is about motivation to exercise among students. It looks at extrinsic motivation to exercise. This could help with the development of our app because this would also be an extrinsic motivator.  
|7h
|Lecture and meeting (3.5h), finding literature (1h), second meeting (1.5h), research (1h)
|-
|Daan Kuijpers
|7h
|Lecture and meeting (3.5h), finding literature (1h), second meeting (1.5h), exploring Figma (1h)
|-
|-
|<nowiki>https://www.amjhealthstudies.com/index.php/ajhs/article/view/57</nowiki>  
|Louise Rietra
|This article looked at the barriers that students face when wanting to exercise.  
|7h
|Lecture and meeting (3.5h), finding literature (1h), second meeting (1.5h), motivation (1h)
|-
|Chris Smeets
|7.5h
|Lecture and meeting (3.5h) finding literature (1.5h), second meeting (1.5h), research workouts (1h)
|-
|-
|<nowiki>https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07448481.2010.513074</nowiki>  
|Thijn van Veggel
|In this article, they looked at how race, gender, and age affected motivation to exercise.  
|8h
|Lecture and meeting (3.5h), finding literature (1.5h), second meeting (1.5h), GUI research (1.5h)
 
|-
|-
|<nowiki>https://hubermanlab.com/newsletter/tools-to-manage-dopamine-and-improve-motivation-and-drive</nowiki>  
|'''Week 2'''
|This article looked more into the neuroscience side of motivation. It looks into how dopamine affects motivation.
|'''Total hours'''
|}
|'''Tasks done (incl. hours per task)'''  
Roel:
{| class="wikitable"
|'''Link:'''  
|'''Content:'''  
|-
|-
|Full article: Leveling Up Your Game: The Use of Video Games as a Therapeutic Modality (tandfonline.com)
|Geert Boer
|This article introduces and begins to explore the use of video game technology in a therapeutic setting, providing context, rationale, and an introduction to the culture of video game players.  
|6.5h
|Meetings (4h), state-of-the-art (2.5h)
|-
|-
|The Gameful World: Approaches, Issues, Applications - Google Boeken
|Roel Domensino
|This article talks about the approach, issues and applications of creating a game-like world.  
|8.5h
|Meetings (4h), research and conclusions motivation (2,5h),comprehensive report motivation (2h)
|-
|-
|Health promotion: The impact of beliefs of health benefits, social relations and enjoyment on exercise continuation - Nielsen - 2014 - Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports - Wiley Online Library
|Daan Kuijpers
|This article explores how and why participants in structured exercise intervention programs continue or stop exercising after the program is finished
|9h
|Meetings (4h), App development (4.5h), Uploading Wikipage (0.5h)
|-
|-
|<nowiki>Health impact of sport and exercise in emerging adult men: a prospective study | Quality of Life Research (springer.com) </nowiki>
|Louise Rietra
|This article talks about the impact of sport and exercise on young men  
|6h
|Meetings (4h), state-of-the-art (2h)  
|-
|-
|Full article: Promoting habit formation (tandfonline.com)
|Chris Smeets
|This article talks about how to give developers the tools to help establish target behaviors as habits.  
|7.5h
|Meetings (4h), Character concept (1h), Data gathering and analysis (2.5)
|-
|-
|The Effects of Cooperation and Competition on Intrinsic Motivation and Performance. (apa.org)  
|Thijn van Veggel
|This article investigates the effect of cooperation and competition on intrinsic motivation and performance, and the difference between the two effects.
|6h
|}
|Meetings (4h), App development and looking at example apps (2h)
Daan:
{| class="wikitable"
|'''Link:'''
|'''Content:'''
|-
|-
|Thehowandwhyoffitnessappuseinvestigatingusermotivationstogaininsightsintothenexusoftechnologyandfitness.pdf
|'''Week 3'''
|The article discusses fitness tracking apps and how they promote fitness activity. It further discusses motivation and provides potential improvements in terms of motivation for fitness apps.  
|'''Total hours'''
|'''Tasks done (incl. hours per task)'''
|-
|-
|Motivation and timing: Clues formodeling the reward system - ScienceDirect
|Geert Boer
|This article discusses how our neurological reward system works and its connection with motivation.  
|10.5h
|meetings (4h) , Design ideas app + Charachter concept(3h), designing the friend page and add friend page in figma (3,5h).  
|-
|-
|CanMobileAppsMotivateFitnessTrackingAStudyofTechnologicalAffordancesandWorkoutBehaviors.pdf
|Roel Domensino
|The study investigated the impact of features in a workout app on exercise outcomes and goal attainment for 682 users, finding that elements promoting relatedness, autonomy, and competence positively predicted results.  
|8h
|Meetings(4h),sketches/ideas app pages(1.5h), detailed competition page (2h), Uploading Wikipage (0.5h)
|-
|-
|Workout Motivation Through Technology-Mediated Training (jackyfwong.com)
|Daan Kuijpers
|Short article that discusses how technology could help with workout motivation and how it could improve workout outcomes.  
|10.5h
|Meetings (4h), Design ideas app + Character concept (3h), Designing app further (3.5h)
|-
|-
|Full article: Sport and fitness app uses: a review of humanities and social science perspectives (tandfonline.com)  
|Louise Rietra
|This study looks at sociological interpretations addressing several factors and potential positive and negative effects of such apps.
|10h
|meetings (4h), design ideas app + Character concept (3h), figuring out Figma and designing the settings and notification page (3h)
|-
|-
|Sports App User Behavior Analysis: Participation Motivation, Satisfaction, and Loyalty (hindawi.com)  
|Chris Smeets
|Part of the article is about how sports app users are motivated and what effects this has.
|10.5h
|meetings (4h), Design ideas app + Character concept (3h), Designing pages surrounding exercise (3.5h)  
|-
|-
|MolinaandSundarChapterinHealthTheoryBook.pdf  
|Thijn van Veggel
|A book that looks at how media can affect a person's health along with motivation.
|10h
|meetings (4h), Design ideas app + Character concept (3h), designing the homepage (3h)
|}
|}
Chris:
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable mw-collapsible"
|'''Week 4'''
|'''Link:'''  
|'''Total hours'''  
|'''Content:'''  
|'''Tasks done (incl. hours per task)'''  
|-
|-
|<nowiki>https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85162186527&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&sid=0958581a1dcf5e74db849ef0873317bb&sot=b&sdt=b&s=TITLE-ABS-KEY%28%22mobile+exercise%22%29&sl=31&sessionSearchId=0958581a1dcf5e74db849ef0873317bb&relpos=1</nowiki>  
|Geert Boer
|
|7.5h
|Lecture and meeting (4h), giving all screens the same theme and background (1.5h), second meeting (1.5h), creating the calendar screen (0.5h)
|-
|-
|<nowiki>https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85168993626&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&sid=0958581a1dcf5e74db849ef0873317bb&sot=b&sdt=b&s=TITLE-ABS-KEY%28%22exercise+apps%22%29&sl=31&sessionSearchId=0958581a1dcf5e74db849ef0873317bb&relpos=16</nowiki>  
|Roel Domensino
|
|9
|Lecture and meeting (4h), Change competition and change log in screen (1.5h), second meeting (1.5h), presentation focus group (2h)
|-
|-
|<nowiki>https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/10410236.2018.1536961</nowiki>  
|Daan Kuijpers
|
|5h
|Lecture and meeting (4h), Make fortune wheel work (1h)
|-
|-
|<nowiki>https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85174183820&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&sid=0958581a1dcf5e74db849ef0873317bb&sot=b&sdt=b&s=TITLE-ABS-KEY%28%22exercise+application%22%29&sl=31&sessionSearchId=0958581a1dcf5e74db849ef0873317bb&relpos=8</nowiki>  
|Louise Rietra
|
|9h
|Lecture and meeting (4h), reward system (1.5h), second meeting (1.5h), writing motivation, results, and GUI for report (2h)
|-
|-
|<nowiki>https://mhealth.jmir.org/2016/2/e62</nowiki>  
|Chris Smeets
|This is an article that shows that usage of a tracking app greatly enhances the frequency of exercise.  
|9h
|Lecture and meeting (4h), elaborate the workout screen (1.5h), second meeting (1.5h), linking all the screens together (2h)
|-
|-
|<nowiki>https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1090198112452126</nowiki>  
|Thijn van Veggel
|This article shows research about the lack of a proper exercise app, mostly hinting at a lack of proper theory inclusion
|7h
|Lecture and meeting (4h), working on the app (2.5h), second meeting (1.5h) making informed consent form (0.5h)
 
|}
|}
Thijn:
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|'''Link:'''  
|'''Week 5'''  
|'''Content:'''  
|'''Total hours'''
|'''Tasks done (incl. hours per task)'''  
|-
|-
|Motivation in sport settings: A goal perspective approach. (apa.org)
|Geert Boer
 
|7,5h
 
|Lecture meeting, and focus group (4h), plan screens (1h), second meeting (1.5h), calender (1h)
Handbook of Competence and Motivation, First Edition - Google Boeken
|The first link is the APA of the book from the second link. It is about a book which adopted a goal-focused approach to the study of motivation in sport. It focusses on three major issues, namely the relationship between goal perspectives and cognitive mediators of motivation, intrinsic interest and the correspondence between goal perspectives and the broader concept of values in the sport domain.  
|-
|-
|An integrative analysis of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport (tandfonline.com)  
|Roel Domensino
 
|7h
|The purpose of this paper is to propose a motivational sequence that integrates much of the intrinsic and extrinsic motivation literature in sport.
|Lecture, meeting, and focus group (4h), competition chat screen (1h), reward screens and videos for exercises (2h)
|-
|-
|Motivation-in-sport-from-a-collective-efficacy-perspective.pdf (researchgate.net)  
|Daan Kuijpers
|This article is about group motivation. So, it focusses on the motivation in team sports.
|6.5h
|Meeting (2h), Rewards wheel adjusted (0.5h), Working on app (4h)
|-
|-
|Toward a Developmental Theory of Children's Motivation in Sport in: Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology Volume 9 Issue 2 (1987) (humankinetics.com)  
|Louise Rietra
|This article is about motivation in sport for children. It mainly focusses on the achievement motivation.  
|10.5h
|Lecture, meeting, and focus group (4h), TAM research, introduction, continuing report, and summarize the main points focus group (2.5h), second meeting (1.5h), screens for beginner and setting personal goals (1h), cleaning and adjusting wiki (1.5h)
|-
|-
|Achievement motive and sport participation - ScienceDirect
|Chris Smeets
|The article is about three studies which investigated the relationship between the achievement motive and sport participation. It looks at implicit and explicit motivation.  
|6h
|Lecture, meeting, and focus group (4h), Incorporating timer (0.5h), second meeting (1.5h)
|-
|-
|College Students' Motivation for Physical Activity: Differentiating Men's and Women's Motives for Sport Participation and Exercise: Journal of American College Health: Vol 54, No 2 (tandfonline.com)  
|Thijn van Veggel
|This article is about a study in which the authors compare motivations for sport participation versus exercise among college students.
|8.5h
|Meetings (4h), Focus group preparation and execution (3h), Working on Figma (1.5h)  
 
|}
|}
Geert:
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|'''Week 6'''
|'''Link:'''  
|'''Total hours'''  
|'''Content:'''  
|'''Tasks done (incl. hours per task)'''  
|-
|-
|<nowiki>https://mhealth.jmir.org/2016/2/e39</nowiki>
|Geert Boer
 
|7.5h
|This article is about how effective mobile apps are when it comes to promoting a healthy lifestyle among adolescents and students. It is literature study combining 15 other studies.  
|Meetings (4h), making screens and connecting to flow (1.5h), making final google forms (2h)
|-
|-
|<nowiki>https://mhealth.jmir.org/2019/7/e11926/</nowiki>
|Roel Domensino
 
|7.5h
|This article analyzes 2000 apps in order to determine which one is most effective in causing a behavioral change.  
|Meetings (4h), making screens (1.5h), Substantiate choices with literature (2h)
|-
|-
|<nowiki>https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Atreyi-Kankanhalli/publication/309557443_Gamification_in_Fitness_Apps_How_do_Leaderboards_influence_Exercise/links/586ca96f08ae8fce4919f096/Gamification-in-Fitness-Apps-How-do-Leaderboards-influence-Exercise.pdf</nowiki>
|Daan Kuijpers
 
|7h
|This study analyzes the gamification of fitness apps. And focuses specifically on whether a competitive leaderboard is boosting motivation.
|Meeting (4h), making final google forms (2h), fixing errors in app (1h)
|-
|-
|<nowiki>https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1441352318302225</nowiki>
|Louise Rietra
 
|7.5h
|This article compares a more social app where you can chat with each other to a gamified app which is oriented towards fun to motivate. As it turns out according to this social is more effective.  
|Meetings (4h), interview (0.5h), set-up interview questions (1h), Write TAM part (2h)
|-
|-
|<nowiki>https://www.mdpi.com/2254-9625/13/8/103</nowiki>
|Chris Smeets
 
|8h
|This article goes into the negative and positive effects of gamefication on the health and fitness industry.
|Meetings (4h), creation tutorial (4h)
|-
|-
|<nowiki>https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0890117118790394?casa_token=gUEjY5q6tKMAAAAA%3A0tsZvqCuPEhC7PdCKiVxakcIeBEHxZs8hN2MpnnaKe9WiGclpEZWG2KQqt-P9ul-8Nc8-L1cdqM</nowiki>
|Thijn van Veggel
|7h
|Meetings (4h), make a list of all choices being made and categorize them (1h), analyse the results from the focus group and write down all answers neatly (2h)


|This article analyzes different game aspects of gamification and analyzes each effectiveness.
|}
|}
Week 2 literature:
GUI
https://medium.com/sketch-app-sources/principles-of-color-psychology-in-mobile-application-design-8d338144ffff
https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/279044.279051
Motivation
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/22786821211000182
https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3267851.3267855?casa_token=ZG820ID4nscAAAAA:VvkeqjnUMmLAWAz4plV5CEqthL40LEztPjWg1ZwBKMbBjXHJwu74ucvPb0j5lUS6HHOQ59qOAuD10Q
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00779-017-1025-1
https://academic.oup.com/abm/article/56/2/212/6237428?login=false
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13645579.2019.1629755?casa_token=FftH3oTJdRMAAAAA%3A8zi7cN54Anp8nIT0meOCJCpMdLiXaj4-wjD1TdRJr7pb6-BDjhinQ39DWMUC5hgptQtBw9RNJdtwHg
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0144929X.2023.2196582?casa_token=Awxyowuxid0AAAAA%3ALUpXN_Btj2YHIAKKUEg1SoJRqb8r9844oU-nrdYyEZMJuJ4K8uK3risLvMmsJGgp_j5ywDjh7HN3hA
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-10208-5_2
https://www.hubermanlab.com/newsletter/tools-to-manage-dopamine-and-improve-motivation-and-drive
https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-14304-005
https://europepmc.org/article/med/20046192
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1123/rsj.2017-0026
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11218-011-9157-z
State-of-art
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irMJLcmSG5k
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7510592/
https://www.makeuseof.com/apps-gamify-fitness-routine/
https://shakuro.com/blog/fitness-app-gamification-in-2021-a-trend-you-cant-miss
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-24294-6_24
McKay, F. H., Wright, A., Shill, J., Stephens, H., & Uccellini, M. (2019). Using Health and Well-Being Apps for Behavior Change: A Systematic search and Rating of apps. ''Jmir Mhealth and Uhealth'', ''7''(7), e11926. https://doi.org/10.2196/119264
Edwards, E., Lumsden, J., Rivas, C., Steed, L., Edwards, L., Thiyagarajan, A., Sohanpal, R., Caton, H., Griffiths, C., Munafò, M. R., Taylor, S. J. C., & Walton, R. (2016). Gamification for health promotion: systematic review of behaviour change techniques in smartphone apps. ''BMJ Open'', ''6''(10), e012447. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012447
Cowan, L., Van Wagenen, S. A., Brown, B. A., Hedin, R. J., Seino-Stephan, Y., Hall, P. C., & West, J. H. (2012). Apps of Steel: Are exercise apps providing consumers with realistic expectations? ''Health Education & Behavior'', ''40''(2), 133–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198112452126
Questionnaire
https://forms.gle/ZRBihpS5EVGqeqFLA
App development
https://youtu.be/va3Gbtb1S0E?si=kcwj4b2MfTN-ghSu
https://mycolor.space/?hex=%235E9CC2&sub=1
== Log: ==
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|'''Week 1'''  
|'''Week 7'''  
|'''Total hours'''  
|'''Total hours'''  
|'''Tasks done (incl. hours per task)'''  
|'''Tasks done (incl. hours per task)'''  
|-
|-
|Geert Boer  
|Geert Boer  
|7h
|
|Lecture and meeting (3.5h), finding literature (1h), second meeting (1.5h), app research (1h)
|
|-
|-
|Roel Domensino  
|Roel Domensino  
|7h
|8h
|Lecture and meeting (3.5h), finding literature (1h), second meeting (1.5h), research (1h)  
|Meetings (4h), Fixing all connections in Figma and organizing Figma (2h), organizing wiki and adding methods (2h)
|-
|-
|Daan Kuijpers  
|Daan Kuijpers  
|7h
|6.5h
|Lecture and meeting (3.5h), finding literature (1h), second meeting (1.5h), exploring Figma (1h)  
|Meetings (4h), Gathering results from last survey (1.5h), Finalizing App (1h)
|-
|-
|Louise Rietra  
|Louise Rietra  
|7h
|6h
|Lecture and meeting (3.5h), finding literature (1h), second meeting (1.5h), motivation (1h)  
|Meetings (4h), organizing wiki and adjusting results (2h)
|-
|-
|Chris Smeets  
|Chris Smeets  
|7.5h  
|6.5h
|Lecture and meeting (3.5h) finding literature (1.5h), second meeting (1.5h), research workouts (1h)  
|Meetings (4h), preparation presentation (2.5h)  
|-
|-
|Thijn van Veggel  
|Thijn van Veggel  
|8h
|6.5h
|Lecture and meeting (3.5h), finding literature (1.5h), second meeting (1.5h), GUI research (1.5h)  
|Meetings (4h), preparation presentation (2.5h)


|-
|}
|'''Week 2'''
{| class="wikitable"
|'''Total hours'''
|'''Week 8'''  
|'''Total hours'''  
|'''Tasks done (incl. hours per task)'''  
|'''Tasks done (incl. hours per task)'''  
|-
|-
|Geert Boer  
|Geert Boer  
|6.5h
|
|Meetings (4h), state-of-the-art (2.5h)
|
|-
|-
|Roel Domensino  
|Roel Domensino  
|6.5h
|4.5h
|Meetings (4h), research and conclusions motivation (2,5h)  
|Watching presentations(2h), Finalizing wiki(2.5h)
|-
|-
|Daan Kuijpers  
|Daan Kuijpers  
|7.5h
|3.5h
|Meetings (4h), App development (3h), Uploading Wikipage (0.5h)
|Watching presentations(2h), Writing part wiki + reading wiki (1.5h)
|-
|-
|Louise Rietra  
|Louise Rietra  
|6h
|3h
|Meetings (4h), state-of-the-art (2h)  
|Watching presentation (2h), finish references and finalize the introduction (1h)
|-
|-
|Chris Smeets  
|Chris Smeets  
|7.5h
|3h
|Meetings (4h), Character concept (1h), Data gathering and analysis (2.5)  
|Watching presentation (2h), Reading wiki (1h)
|-
|-
|Thijn van Veggel  
|Thijn van Veggel  
|6h
|3h
|Meetings (4h), App development and looking at example apps (2h)  
|Watching presentation (2h), Reading wiki (1h)
 
|}
|}

Latest revision as of 13:36, 12 April 2024

Members
Name ID Department
Geert Boer 1894803 Biomedical Engineering
Roel Domensino 1758896 Automotive Technology
Daan Kuijpers 1892800 Biomedical Engineering
Louise Rietra 1859269 Industrial Engineering
Chris Smeets 1845403 Biomedical Engineering
Thijn van Veggel 1732358 Psychology & Technology

Introduction

Nowadays technological innovations have penetrated nearly every aspect of our lives, the realm of fitness remains a pivotal area that is broadened every year. With new research done and the variety of different exercise forms, there is a ton of information on this subject. In the app store, there are over 97,000 fitness and health apps providing all kinds of information. This can be viewed as overwhelming. How are we supposed to know which app to choose? And will this app live up to my expectations? Or will I be bored after using it for a week? This overload of information can cause a barrier for the population, because we simply do not know what to do with all the information provided. Not only the overwhelming amount of information is a barrier to work out, also the lack of motivation seems to be a contributing factor to the lack of physical activity among young adults. This lifestyle among young adults not only contributes to a variety of health issues but also impacts their overall productivity and quality of life.  

Despite the awareness regarding the benefits of physical activity, a substantial portion of young adults remain disengaged from fitness activities. Furthermore, not only the lack of motivation can be discouraging, but also for beginners, the gym environment can seem like a daunting place where you feel judged by everyone around you. This intimidation factor, coupled with the absence of motivation towards fitness, often leaves individuals feeling overwhelmed and even less motivated.  

As we recognized these challenges as a call to action, this project aims to motivate young adults who want to work out but are still reluctant to go to the gym. This is done by the fusion of fitness and gamification. Our mission is twofold: to address the issue of lack of physical activity amongst the youth and to inspire and empower individuals who have yet to embark on their fitness journey.

The decision to focus our efforts on developing a gamified fitness app is because games are considered to be fun and engaging. So, by using the principles of game design and applying them to fitness activities, the project aims to put a twist on the way individuals perceive and engage with exercise. Through interactive challenges, rewards systems, and immersive experiences, the app seeks to diffuse the fitness journey with elements of excitement, competition, and achievement, in order to create a fun and engaging app.  

Furthermore, the choice to target young adults as a demographic specifically is rooted in not only the convenience of having similar aged people as a demographic, but also because young adults are in their prime years to shape future health behaviours (Bonnie et al., 2015). By forming positive exercise habits early on, we not only will prevent the health risks that will come with a lazy lifestyle, but also lays a foundation for a lifetime of well-being and vitality.  

Moreover, the commitment to inclusivity and accessibility underscores the dedication to reaching individuals who may feel excluded from traditional fitness spaces by for example the overwhelming amount of information or the intimidation of the fitness community as mentioned above. By providing a digital platform that helps diverse fitness levels, preferences, and schedules, the app strives to create a welcoming and supportive community where every individual feels empowered to embark on their fitness journey at their own pace.

State of the art

When examining the landscape of fitness apps currently dominating the market, it's evident that they come in various forms, with distinctions between free and subscription-based models. Popular free apps like Nike Training Club, FitOn, and Adidas Training offer accessible workout options often using video or audio guidance to explain exercises. Additionally, these apps frequently incorporate features such as follow-along workouts with personal trainers and filtering systems based on difficulty, time, and workout type (KevTheTrainer, 2022). On the other hand, subscription-based apps like Muscle Booster, Peloton, Fitbot, and Aaptiv offer more specialized services, often providing premium content and personalized training experiences. Despite these variations, both free and subscription-based apps share a common goal of motivating users to engage in physical activities.

Now let's delve into the already existing gamification in fitness apps. Mack (2023) made a distinction between 5 different fitness apps that already use gamification, PlayFitt, Hops, Treeceps, Nerd fitness journey, and Fitness RPG. Looking at the details of the gamified apps we see that there are several apps that use a leaderboard in which you are compared to other players (Fitness RPG and PlayFitt),  others make use of daily trackers to stimulate the forming of habits (PlayFitt, Hops, Nerd fitness journey, and Fitness RPG) and some give you the opportunity to customize the character (PlayFitt and Hops).  

Another more recent study in 2019 analyzed 212352 health and fitness apps of these apps it was found that about 5018 could be considered gamified. However, a mere 344 were truly classified as behavior change apps. This is a shocking 0.16% of all ‘health’ apps. This study didn’t just look at fitness/exercise apps but also at apps to help stop smoking or to eat healthier. The 344 behavior change apps were then further analyzed to check their effectiveness. Two scales were used on the first scale the apps scored an average of 2.93 out of 5. And on a one point per criteria scale the highest scored was 17 out of 21 with an average of 7.8. This indicates that even though a lot of fitness apps exist they severely lack a strong foundation of behavior change theory (McKay et al., 2019). Our app could set itself apart by including some true behavior change theory. With especially crucial things like social support being only used by 3% of all apps (Edwards et al., 2016). According to an older study this can be attributed to the fact that app developers come from a variety of backgrounds. They often lack the Theory to base their apps upon. So if we want to improve on these apps we should use behavior change theory to expand on the existing foundations of the apps that are currently available.

This literature research mostly provided knowledge on the lack of behavior change theory in fitness apps. Combining the knowledge of what the apps seems to lack now, what the users want the app to contain (through surveys) and what behavior change theory says should work could create a more stimulating fitness app.

Technology acceptance Model

In recent years, the integration of gamification elements within fitness apps has revolutionized the way users perceive and engage with physical activities. Research in this domain has shed light on the intricate relationship between gamification, user perceptions, and behavioral outcomes, offering valuable insights into the design and effectiveness of these applications.

A seminal study investigated how users of fitness apps perceive their attitudes and motivations towards physical activities, and how gamification elements within these apps relate to their self-efficacy in performing such activities. Analyzing a vast dataset comprising 87,074 Fitbit user reviews and conducting subsequent surveys, the findings revealed that gamification elements such as self-monitoring, goal-setting, social support, and rewards significantly influenced users' participation in physical activities. Moreover, these elements were found to enhance users' self-efficacy, consequently boosting their motivation to engage in physical activities through the app.

Furthermore, the integration of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) into the analysis provided a deeper understanding of users' perceptions of fitness apps and technology adoption behavior. The TAM posits that users are more likely to accept and utilize a new technology when they perceive it as easy to use, useful, and reliable. In the context of fitness apps, the perceived ease of use, usefulness, and system reliability were found to significantly impact users' motivation and intention to engage in physical activities.

Methodologically, studies have emphasized rigorous data collection procedures, including analyzing user reviews and conducting surveys among diverse user groups. Statistical analyses, such as confirmatory factor analysis, have been employed to ensure the validity and reliability of the findings. Recommendations for future research include exploring user experience, demographic characteristics, and conducting experimental studies using longitudinal survey methods to gain deeper insights into the adoption and utilization of fitness apps.

In summary, the state-of-the-art research underscores the pivotal role of gamification in shaping user perceptions, motivations, and behaviors towards physical activities through fitness apps. By integrating gamification elements effectively and considering user perceptions and system attributes, developers can design more engaging and effective fitness apps to promote physical activity participation and improve overall health outcomes.  

Theory

Theory

Theory was used to guide design choices together with user feedback. Here choices made are shown and theory-relevant choices are discussed.

Choices  Literature  Questionnaire  Focus group 
Use of gamification  X  X  X 
Human character     X    
Looks character        X 
When notifications     X   X 
Kind of notifications  X X     
Streak  X        
Ranking among friends  X   X     
Competition and Cooperation  X   X     
Wheel  X        
GUI/Colours app  X   X   X  
Setup workout screen     X   X  
Having personal goals  X     X  
XP progression system  X  X   X 
Chatting with friends        X  
Having different kinds of cardio        X  
App used to design our product X


Use of gamification

The very first choice made to increase exercising among young adults, was to make use of gamification in a fitness app. Gamification was considered and used given that “Motivation is demonstrated by an individual’s choice to engage in an activity and the intensity of effort or persistence in that activity. Current approaches concern two dominant clusters that play a role in determining player’s motivation: extrinsic and intrinsic motivation.  Gamification combines these two motivations; on one hand using extrinsic rewards such as levels, points, badges to improve engagement while striving to raise feelings of achieving mastery, autonomy, sense of belonging” (Richter et al, 2014). This double working paired with young adults prevalence in gaming cemented the idea to use gamification to reach our goal.  


XP progression system

As the name suggests, a progression system is a system where users are rewarded for exercising in the form of progression in a certain system. This can range from simply gaining points or leveling up to collecting fictional characters. In our case this is in the form of XP (experience points), as this was preferred according to the questionnaire. This system encourages users through extrinsic motivation with rewards, to improve engagement, while also raising feelings of achieving mastery, autonomy, sense of belonging as intrinsic motivation (Richter et al, 2014).  

The most important decisions to be made are how difficult should this system be, how often should rewards be given and should punishments be used as well? 


“People with high motivation to succeed prefer tasks of intermediate difficulty. However, if the motive to avoid failure is stronger people prefer either very simple or very difficult tasks” (Richter et al, 2014). As our app is used to succeed in exercising regularly, most users should possess a motivation to succeed instead of a motivation to not fail. As such we will implement tasks of intermediate difficulty based on users' previous data.  

“Use (Randomly) an Intermittent Reward Timing (RIRT). This is the most powerful schedule for dopamine release and staying motivated. The casinos use it to take people’s money. It works 100% of the time. You can use RIRT to your advantage, to stay motivated in any pursuit. The key is to celebrate your wins, but do not celebrate every win” (Huberman, 2023). Sources suggest that the most efficient way of handing out rewards is by making the random and unpredictable. To implement this, a prize wheel with different bonusses is used. This prize wheel may be used after completing a certain amount of exercise schedules. Additionally by attaining a streak, which will be explained later, this prize wheel can be upgraded to possess better bonusses.

The normal exercise rewards are handed out when a user completes a set of exercises and when they complete a full schedule. Thus making a exercise count double if they complete the full schedule. Additionally extra multipliers are handed out for consistency and personal improvement. These rewards are always handed out instead of using RIRT as these are the cornerstone of the progression system.  


“We compared the perceived effectiveness of Reward and Punishment quantitatively and found that Reward strategies can engage users and make behaviour fun, reinforce commitments to goals, reveal some consequences of bad behaviour, and their tendency to redirect behaviour intention and trivialise the consequences of bad behaviour. In contrast, Punishment strategies can be depressing, discouraging, and demoralising; therefore, elements of Punishment must be strategically implemented in the persuasive gamified systems, especially those targeted at health behaviours” (Orji et al., 2023). Given this risk of using punishments when targeting health behaviors, we decided that it would be better to not implement them as the risk of using them is not worth the possible positive effect they could have, especially since we don’t have a lot of experience on how to strategically implement them.  

  

Competition and cooperation

This implementation is all about using cooperation and/or competition to inspire more motivation in the users. This can be done through teams, rankings, challenges between individuals, challenges between teams, communal goals and the like. According to sources the combination of cooperation and competition is most effective at motivation (Tauer & Harackiewicz, 2004). To ensure more certainty, we decided to inquire about this in the survey to ensure the correct choice is made. The results from the survey supported our decision to use both competition and cooperation, but suggested a stronger focus on competition and cooperation between friends. As such a team against team based system was implemented, where a team has the option to send a battle request to another team aside from the regular random matching. This way can opt to compete amongst themselves. Additionally the focus group suggested the implementation of a chat for the teams. This suggestion was adopted. Finally, to further boost competition between friends, the friends list is sorted based on weekly exercise points. These are handed out when one completes and exercise schedule and are reset every week.

 

Motivational messages/reminders 

According to De Vries et al. (2017), personality and sex of a user are relevant for the effectiveness of messages with a certain tone. Generally, the most effective tone is positive and cooperative. Given the difference per user, we decided to obtain opinions from the users by including it in the survey and by allowing a user to choose between a few different tones which were preferred the most according to the survey. The positive and cooperative tone along with the funny tone was found to be the most preferred and are thus implemented, where the user can select in the settings which one of these types of messages they would like to receive.

 

Streak

A streak is a way of rewarding users for consistently doing something. According to Fook en Dastane (2021), consistency systems such as this are relatively effective at creating habits and as such are certainly something we would want to implement. In our case such a system will work weekly, where the user will get a progressively increasing multiplier to rewards, they get from doing exercises. It is not daily since many cannot exercise every day and it is not longer than weekly since exercise should be done regularly (Siddiqui et al., 2010). As the desired frequency of going to the gym differs per person, we decided to allow the user to choose how often one has to go each week to retain the streak. A more difficult to retain streak is made to be more rewarding than one which is easier to retain, to stimulate more frequent gym visits.  


GUI

“A good GUI should present information that is contextual and consistent. It should avoid unnecessary detail and put as much information in as little words as possible to conserve screen space. It is better to utilize familiar data formats, if they exist (Jansen, 1998). Furthermore, a GUI should use colours to group information. Graphical boundaries are very effective in grouping items (Jansen, 1998). Other highlighting techniques are reverse video, brightness, underlining and flashing (Jansen, 1998). The information should be presented in a sequence in which the user needs it in. More important information should precede the lesser important information and general items should precede more specific items. Frequently used, needed information or commands should be in the most important location (Jansen, 1998). If there is no order, use alphabetical order. The GUI of our app was shaped in accordance with this detailed explanation. Changes were made based on feedback from the users.


Color

“Furthermore, the colours used in an app should not be more than 3, it should be as simplistic as possible (Kachan, 2021). Different colors generate specific human behavior. Social media apps usually use mostly bright and vibrant colors, while mind and body apps usually use more neutral colors. Here are some words with associated colors:  

  • Security and trust: Blue    
  • Speed: Red  
  • Cheapness: Orange and yellow  
  • High quality: Black (orange the least)  
  • High technology: Black, blue and gray  
  • Reliability: Blue  
  • Fun: Orange and yellow  

You have to think about the impression that you want to give the users. If you want to give the expression it is an entertaining app, then use warm tones, but if you want to show it is a trade or e-commerce app, then use cooler tones like blue or a gray-scaled scheme, which is more reliable (Kachan, 2021). Given this information we decided to initially use blue as it provided trust and security that we needed as a ‘startup’ from a student group and because the first questionnaire showed that the users would prefer this color the most. The focus group gave a good suggestion of allowing people to change their color scheme in the settings. We decided to adopt this, while keeping the blue color as the default color. The optional colors to change to were orange, green and light yellow.


App used to design our App

Finally, we decided to choose Figma as our design tool for several reasons, all of which contribute to a smooth and effective design process for our app. First of all, Figma is user-friendly and easy to use. For newcomers like us, designing in Figma is very intuitive and accessible, allowing us to get started quickly.

One of the most convincing aspects of Figma is the ability to easily collaborate with others in real time. Whether our team is working remotely or sitting together on a screen design, Figma's real-time collaboration features allow us to work on the same project at the same time.  

Moreover, Figma provides TU/e students with full access to their platform. This is especially valuable for us, as being students and having access to all of Figma's features and capabilities allows us to develop our designs professionally without limitations. We also received positive feedback from other students who had used Figma before.

All in all, Figma has proven to be the ideal choice for making our app design because of its user-friendliness, collaborative capabilities, student access and positive reputation among its users. With Figma as our design program, we can create a high-quality and effective design for our app.

Method

To reach the most desirable product for our users, we focused on obtaining and implementing feedback to shape our product, while using literature as support.  As such, we started with literary research on motivation, habit formation, exercise, current fitness apps, gamification and app design.  This research allowed us to form a general outline on what kind of features we possibly wanted to use in our app and on how the app would look. This general outline was used to create a questionnaire which provided feedback on whether possible features should be implemented or not, if so in what way and whether features were missing.  

With a clear image of what features and thus kind of pages/screens should be in the app, an actual visualization and design of how these screens would look and flow from one another had to be made. As such, all members were tasked to create sketches for multiple different screens and a block diagram was made to illustrate the interactions between the screens.  The multiple sketches for each screen were discussed to decide upon a clear outline for each screen. Each member was subsequently tasked to create a specific screen in detail according to the outline decided upon.  

These detailed screens slightly adapted to conform to one style and were evaluated through a focus group to get new feedback. Most of this feedback was implemented to further enhance our product. To ensure that the feedback was implemented correctly, interviews with some of the members of the focus group were held to discuss our implementation of their feedback. Sadly, due to time constraints the new feedback from these interviews was not implemented.  

Finally, to test our final design another questionnaire was sent out to get a read on user satisfaction and on how our product would compare against existing products.

Results

The results from the first survey were as follows:  

number of survey participants: 113

Personal identification

39.8% female, 57.5% male, 2.7% other

Average age is 19.76, ranging from 17 to 24

94.7% is a Student


Current exercise situation

Average frequency of exercise is about 3 times a week (When considering “more than 5” as 6.5)

About 70% (69.9%) would like to exercise more

2/3 of all participants would like to do strength training, 44.1% would like to do Hypertrophy and 68,5% would like to do cardiovascular training.

61.9% is interested in using an app for exercise motivation

64.2% does not currently use a tracking/fitness app


App shape

Option 1(lightblue and gray) is the most popular (55.8%), others don’t get higher than 22.1%. Around 10% is displeased with all concepts.

Preferred tones are Funny (56.8%) and Considering (43.2%)


Multiplayer

Competing against other people is endorsed by 73.5%

Of those who want multiplayer:

94,4% would like to compete against friends

80,6% would like to compete against others

(note that the amount of people that replied varies, with n=90 and n=93 respectively, this is also not representative with the original 73.5%, showing that on average about 9 people answered against multiplayer, but still gave feedback on its creation)


Push notifications

About 70% (69.6%) would like to receive motivational push notifications

Only 38,4% would like to receive notifications about in game events or other-player progression.


Program creation

78,4% would like to make their own exercise program

88,4% would like to receive a program, based on their goals

On a scale from 1 to 5, the preferred customizability is 3.7 (2.7 if 0 to 4)

Tracking in between exercises is possible for 85.7%

On a scale from 1 to 5, the willingness to have predetermined exercise times is 2.25 (1.25 if 0 to 4)


The progression systems are ranked as follows:

  • Character level up (53.2%)
  • “wins” over other players (43.2%)
  • Gaining currency/Exp (36.9%)
  • Power levels (32.4%)
  • Character gathering and leveling (29.7%)


The character creation systems are ranked as follows:

  • Humans (57.7%)
  • Animals (40.5%)
  • Fantasy creatures (31.5%)
  • Hybrids (15.3%)


The results of the first questionnaire helped with designing a rough sketch of the app.  

Initial sketches Louise
Initial sketches Roel





Initial sketches Geert


Initial sketches Geert 2



Initial sketches Thijn



Initial sketches Daan 1
Initial sketches Daan 3
Initial sketches Chris
Initial sketches Daan 2
Initial connection web for the app
1st design Competition

After the sketches were discussed, an app was developed with keeping in mind the preferences of the surveys and our own preferences. The following screens were developed:  

1st design settings & notifications
1st design Workout
1st design homescreen
1st design reward wheel
1st design Friend list


Since we worked on the screens separately, the designs were quite different from each other, especially the colors. So, after discussing the each other's designs we settled on a style that would best fit the app. Here are a few examples of the result:

Altered color design 1
Altered color design 2


After this the feedback from the focus group was implemented. The feedback points were:  

They were all unanimous about which colour scheme fits the app the best, namely the blue one. There was someone who pointed out that having the option to select different colours would be nice, on which the others agreed. They would also like the character to be less muscular, because that might be discouraging for someone who is not as fit. Additionally, they would like the possibility to select a female character as well and they want the character to show progression when they level up. The attendees liked our layout and thought the app was clear, but they would like to have more options when you go to the cardio workout, so not only running but also for example riding a bike or swimming. They would also like the option to fulfill personal goals and the ability to time workouts.  

Both focus groups liked our app more than regular fitness apps, which is mainly due to the competition element in our app. They did notice that our calendar was a bit minimalistic and should be worked out better. Furthermore, both groups thought that our app would be less accessible for beginners. They suggested adding videos on how certain exercises work and adding more instructions about how to create workouts. They would like the app to save the reps they had done in the previous workout, so that you would not have to worry about this element. Additionally, someone mentioned that it would be nice to add certain exercises based on specific parts of the body.  

The focus group attendees were a bit divided about the point system. They mostly agreed on getting points after the workout is completed. Consistency is imported, so if you make progressions, you should get more points. Someone also said that a more difficult workout should receive more points than an easier one.  

There was one more thing on which everyone agreed, namely that you should not get notifications during a workout, because that would distract and be annoying. Someone mentioned that it would be nice to get a message when a record is broken but is not necessary. They like the streak, but do not want notifications about it. Everyone mentioned that it would be nice to be able to text friends and to chat within a team. It would be appreciated to get certain motivational notifications once a week.  


This resulted in the creation or modification of the following screens:

Change rewards


Rewards for spinning wheel:

SUPER WORKOUT: Your character earns double XP by completing a bonus workout session, leading to a significant boost in experience points.

NUTRITION BOOST: Your character wins a package of nutritious snacks and supplements, enhancing their overall fitness and providing a small XP boost for their next 3 gym sessions.

BUDDY MOTIVATION: Your character receives motivational support from a gym buddy, inspiring them to push harder during their next workout and earning them bonus XP for their next gym session together.

GOOD GUIDANCE: Your character receives personalized training advice from a virtual personal trainer, resulting in improved technique and increased XP gains for the next workout.

VIP GYM ACCESS: Your character gains access to an exclusive VIP section of the gym, complete with premium equipment and amenities, motivating them to return for their next workout and earn extra XP.

WELLNESS RETREAT PACKAGE: Your character wins a package to attend a wellness retreat focused on rejuvenation and self-care. This opportunity to relax and recharge in a serene environment inspires your character to prioritize their health and well-being, motivating them to return to the gym feeling refreshed and ready to tackle their next workout with renewed enthusiasm, resulting in enhanced XP gains as they continue to progress on their fitness journey.

The golden spinning wheel is just when you have reached a certain level, the points for the next workout will either be doubled, tripled, or quadrupled.

Female character addition
Customizability changes
One of the different colour options
More detailed cardio
Xp reward
More detailed calendar
Chat for team and changeable duration of competition
Trophies
Part of added tutorial
Friend chat


Final connection web app



Once the feedback from the focus group was implemented in the app. It was time for a final survey and some interviews.  

The results from the last survey were as follows:  

Number of survey participants: 30


General

90 % has completed the first survey

26,7% Uses already a fitness app, 73,3% doesn’t so there could be potential for our app


Personal identification

50% female, 50% male

Average age is 20, ranging from 19 to 21

100% is a Student


Tutorial

The tutorial is clear for 86,6 %

Other comments 13,4 %:  

  • Background music or voice-over as tutorial  
  • Black arrows blend in with background


Competing against others

Everyone 100% would use the feature, only 1 person mentioned that they wouldn’t use the chat option (separate form chat question)  


Push notifications

Would like to receive motivational push notifications 86,6%

Who wouldn’t 13,4%

Other comments: - Receiving messages that friends have been going to the gym, would be nice

               


Avatars / characters

Likes the avatars 70%

Comments for improvement (30%):

  • Could be body shaming (look too perfect the characters) (make more realistic avatars)
  • More diversity
  • Show progression in the character (own progression)
  • Too big changes in artstyle between the characters
  • Character must be customisable


Home screen:

Home screen approval 96,7%

Other comment: - In leadership widget not only your own position but also the number 1 (leader)


Motivation for wheel:

Motivation is good enough to keep exercising 80%

Other 20% thinks not or didn’t understand the question right


Ranking friend list:

Find ranking among friends a good idea 89,9 %

No good idea or other comment:

  • Making it optional for each user separately
  • Can also be demotivating


Chat function:

Would use this chat feature 66,6%

Wouldn’t use it 33,4% (Most people just use alternative chat apps like WhatsApp)


Choose of app:

60% of the people who already uses a fitness app would prefer our app instead of their current app.


Grade for all-round motivation of app:

Results Grade


Discussion

App limitations:

During the app development we ran into a couple of problems with the features that were meant to be in the app. Thus, some of these features are only cosmetic in our design as having these truly work would require a functional app linked to a server with multiple users. Fully developing the app would also allow us to test how well the app works on the long term. In the limited time of this project it was impossible to fully develop the app. The team consisted of no one with prior knowledge of app development. This complicated the evaluation part of our app so a last feedback round consisting of interviews and a questionnaire had to do. Ideally the app would be evaluated through a trial in which a group of subjects would be split in three groups one group would use no app, another group would use a different state of the art gamified fitness app and the last group would use shapeshifters. Their fitness progress and motivation would be collected over at least a month and preferably longer.


Evaluation:

The last round of feedback gave an insight into how well the app functions and gives the ability to evaluate the app design. The feedback was collected through a questionnaire which had 30 responses and 4 interviews conducted with participants from the focus group.  


Tutorial:

The tutorial is clear and explains every facet of the app. According to the feedback from the form ~90% said that the tutorial was well explained. The other 10% mentioned partly that even though it was clear the tutorial was too long and there is no way to opt out. The feedback from the interviews also relays this information all participants said that the tutorial was clear but just too long which meant that at the end they were distracted.  

Competition:

With the competition being the main feature that sets shapeshifters apart from other apps this is an integral part of the evaluation. The result from the questionnaire showed that 29 out of 30 people were excited about this feature. The interviews also show that this is something that people think is a big motivator. One of the responses was that it resembles Duolingo where you have daily rankings and that the interviewee found that very motivating.  

Ranking friend list:

The survey shows that 90% found this to be a great idea. The other 10% mentioned that it could also be demotivating for someone that just started. As some of your friends could have such a high score that you could never beat them. So this could perhaps be solved by a simple on and off switch that allows users to show the trophies of your friends or not.


Chat function:

This feature was implemented after the feedback from the focus group. The chat function allows chatting with friends and your teammates. This shows as the interviews showed that this was good that it was finally implemented. The questionnaire gave quite a mixed response with 2/3 of the responses saying they would use this function the other 1/3 said this was a redundant feature as they would just keep using other apps like WhatsApp for communication with friends.  

Overall:

Reactions from the interviews were positive. The subjects said that they would use the app. With as only feedback that it is not as applicable to other sports. So someone who boxes will not have full use out of the app. The questionnaire showed that 60% of people who already use a fitness app would use Shapeshifters instead of the one they use now. Subjects were also asked to rate the app on how motivating they thought it would be on a scale of 1-10. The mode of these reactions is 7 and the mean is 7.3.

It would be nice to see the app fully developed and functional in the future. This could lead to a much butter analyzation of the app and whether it works.

References  

Bonnie, R. J., Stroud, C., Breiner, H. (2015, 27 januari). Investing in The Health And Well-Being Of Young Adults - NCBI Bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK284776/

Cowan, L., Van Wagenen, S. A., Brown, B. A., Hedin, R. J., Seino-Stephan, Y., Hall, P. C., & West, J. H. (2012). Apps of Steel: Are exercise apps providing consumers with realistic expectations? Health Education & Behavior, 40(2), 133–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198112452126

De Vries, R., Truong, K. P., Zaga, C., Li, J., & Evers, V. (2017). A word of advice: how to tailor motivational text messages based on behavior change theory to personality and gender. Personal And Ubiquitous Computing, 21(4), 675–687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-017-1025-1

Edwards, E., Lumsden, J., Rivas, C., Steed, L., Edwards, L., Thiyagarajan, A., Sohanpal, R., Caton, H., Griffiths, C., Munafò, M. R., Taylor, S. J. C., & Walton, R. (2016). Gamification for health promotion: systematic review of behaviour change techniques in smartphone apps. BMJ Open, 6(10), e012447. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012447

Egli, T. J., Bland, H. W., Melton, B. F., & Czech, D. R. (2011). Influence of Age, Sex, and Race on College Students’ Exercise Motivation of Physical Activity. Journal Of American College Health, 59(5), 399–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2010.513074

Fook, A. C. W., & Dastane, O. (2021). Effectiveness of Loyalty Programs in Customer Retention: A Multiple Mediation Analysis. Jindal Journal of Business Research, 10(1), 7-32. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/22786821211000182

Hao, W., & Chuen-Tsai, S. (2011). Game reward systems: gaming experiences and social meanings. DiGRA. http://www.digra.org/digital-library/publications/game-reward-systems-gaming-experiences-and-social-meanings/  

Huberman, A. (2022, 6 October). Tools to Manage Dopamine and Improve Motivation & Drive. https://www.hubermanlab.com/newsletter/tools-to-manage-dopamine-and-improve-motivation-and-drive

Jansen, B. J. (1998). The graphical user interface. SIGCHI Bulletin, 30(2), 22–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/279044.279051

Kachan, D. (2021, 10 december). Principles of Color Psychology in Mobile Application Design. Medium. https://medium.com/sketch-app-sources/principles-of-color-psychology-in-mobile-application-design-8d338144ffff

KevTheTrainer. (2022, 1 januari). 10 Best Fitness Apps for 2023 (Peloton, FitOn, Muscle Booster and More!) [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irMJLcmSG5k

Liu, Y., & Avello, M. (2021). Status of the research in fitness apps: A bibliometric analysis. Telematics And Informatics, 57, 101506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101506

Mack, L. E. (2023, 24 mei). 5 apps that gamify your fitness routine. MUO. https://www.makeuseof.com/apps-gamify-fitness-routine/

McKay, F. H., Wright, A., Shill, J., Stephens, H., & Uccellini, M. (2019). Using Health and Well-Being Apps for Behavior Change: A Systematic search and Rating of apps. Jmir Mhealth and Uhealth, 7(7). https://doi.org/10.2196/119264

Nielsen, G. L., Wikman, J. M., Jensen, C. J., Schmidt, J. F., Gliemann, L., & Andersen, T. F. (2014). Health promotion: The impact of beliefs of health benefits, social relations and enjoyment on exercise continuation. Scandinavian Journal Of Medicine & Science in Sports, 24(S1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12275

Orji, R., Alslaity, A., & Chan, G. (2023). Towards understanding the mechanism through which reward and punishment motivate or demotivate behaviours. Behavior & Information Technology, 1– 25. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0144929X.2023.2196582  

Richter, G., Raban, D. R., & Rafaeli, S. (2014). Studying gamification: The effect of rewards and incentives on motivation. In Springer eBooks (pp. 21–46). https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-10208-5_2  

Schweinle, A., & Helming, L. M. (2011). Success and motivation among college students. Social Psychology Of Education, 14(4), 529–546. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11218-011-9157-z

Siddiqui, NI., Nessa, A., & Hossain, MA. (2010) Regular physical exercise: way to healthy life Mymensingh medical journal (pp. 154–158). https://europepmc.org/article/med/20046192  

Snyder, K., Lee, J. M., Bjornsen, A., & Dinkel, D. (2017). What Gets Them Moving? College Students’ Motivation for Exercise: An Exploratory Study. Recreational Sports Journal, 41(2), 111-124. https://doi.org/10.1123/rsj.2017-0026

Suh, A., Wagner, C., & Liu, H. (2016). Enhancing User Engagement through Gamification. Journal Of Computer Information Systems, 58(3), 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2016.1229143

Tauer, J. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2004). The Effects of Cooperation and Competition on Intrinsic Motivation and Performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(6), 849–861. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.849

Wang, H., & Sun, C. T. (2011, September). Game reward systems: Gaming experiences and social meanings. In DiGRA conference (Vol. 114). https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=d850269a6e95214c6212c6402d06edb918f35db9



Planning:

Monday  

5  

February

Tuesday

6

February

Wednesday

7

February

Thursday

8

February

Friday

9

February

Saturday

10

February

Sunday

11

February

Lecture & meeting     Send E-mail & meeting      
Monday

12  

February

Tuesday

13

February

Wednesday

14

February

Thursday

15

February

Friday

16

February

Saturday

17

February

Sunday

18

February

Vacation Vacation Vacation Vacation Vacation   Update Wiki
Monday

19

February

Tuesday

20

February  

Wednesday

21

February

Thursday

22

February

Friday

23

February

Saturday

24

February  

Sunday

25

February

Meeting     Meeting Finish the questionnaire     Update Wiki
Monday  

26

February

Tuesday

27

February

Wednesday

28

February

Thursday

29

February

Friday

1

March

Saturday

2

March

Sunday  

3

March

Meeting     Meeting     Update Wiki
Monday

4

March

Tuesday

5

March

Wednesday

6

March

Thursday

7

March

Friday

8

March

Saturday

9

March

Sunday

10

March

Meeting     Meeting Finish motivation & Gui research   Update Wiki
Monday  

11

March

Tuesday

12

March

Wednesday

13

March

Thursday

14

March

Friday

15

March

Saturday

16

March

Sunday

17

March

Meeting     Meeting Finish exercise program   Update Wiki
Monday  

18

March

Tuesday

19

March

Wednesday

20

March

Thursday

21

March

Friday

22

March

Saturday

23

March

Sunday

24

March

Meeting   App is finished & start last questionnaire Meeting     Update Wiki
Monday

25

March

Tuesday

26

March

Wednesday

27

March

Thursday

28

March

Friday

29

March

Saturday

30

March

Sunday

31

March

Meeting     Meeting Finished with final report   Update Wiki
Monday  

1

April

Tuesday

2

April

Wednesday

3

April

Thursday

4

April

Friday

5

April

Saturday

6

April

Sunday

7

April

Free     Final presentation    

Log:

Week 1 Total hours Tasks done (incl. hours per task)
Geert Boer 7h Lecture and meeting (3.5h), finding literature (1h), second meeting (1.5h), app research (1h)
Roel Domensino 7h Lecture and meeting (3.5h), finding literature (1h), second meeting (1.5h), research (1h)
Daan Kuijpers 7h Lecture and meeting (3.5h), finding literature (1h), second meeting (1.5h), exploring Figma (1h)
Louise Rietra 7h Lecture and meeting (3.5h), finding literature (1h), second meeting (1.5h), motivation (1h)
Chris Smeets 7.5h Lecture and meeting (3.5h) finding literature (1.5h), second meeting (1.5h), research workouts (1h)
Thijn van Veggel 8h Lecture and meeting (3.5h), finding literature (1.5h), second meeting (1.5h), GUI research (1.5h)
Week 2 Total hours Tasks done (incl. hours per task)
Geert Boer 6.5h Meetings (4h), state-of-the-art (2.5h)
Roel Domensino 8.5h Meetings (4h), research and conclusions motivation (2,5h),comprehensive report motivation (2h)
Daan Kuijpers 9h Meetings (4h), App development (4.5h), Uploading Wikipage (0.5h)
Louise Rietra 6h Meetings (4h), state-of-the-art (2h)
Chris Smeets 7.5h Meetings (4h), Character concept (1h), Data gathering and analysis (2.5)
Thijn van Veggel 6h Meetings (4h), App development and looking at example apps (2h)
Week 3 Total hours Tasks done (incl. hours per task)
Geert Boer 10.5h meetings (4h) , Design ideas app + Charachter concept(3h), designing the friend page and add friend page in figma (3,5h).
Roel Domensino 8h Meetings(4h),sketches/ideas app pages(1.5h), detailed competition page (2h), Uploading Wikipage (0.5h)
Daan Kuijpers 10.5h Meetings (4h), Design ideas app + Character concept (3h), Designing app further (3.5h)
Louise Rietra 10h meetings (4h), design ideas app + Character concept (3h), figuring out Figma and designing the settings and notification page (3h)
Chris Smeets 10.5h meetings (4h), Design ideas app + Character concept (3h), Designing pages surrounding exercise (3.5h)
Thijn van Veggel 10h meetings (4h), Design ideas app + Character concept (3h), designing the homepage (3h)
Week 4 Total hours Tasks done (incl. hours per task)
Geert Boer 7.5h Lecture and meeting (4h), giving all screens the same theme and background (1.5h), second meeting (1.5h), creating the calendar screen (0.5h)
Roel Domensino 9 Lecture and meeting (4h), Change competition and change log in screen (1.5h), second meeting (1.5h), presentation focus group (2h)
Daan Kuijpers 5h Lecture and meeting (4h), Make fortune wheel work (1h)
Louise Rietra 9h Lecture and meeting (4h), reward system (1.5h), second meeting (1.5h), writing motivation, results, and GUI for report (2h)
Chris Smeets 9h Lecture and meeting (4h), elaborate the workout screen (1.5h), second meeting (1.5h), linking all the screens together (2h)
Thijn van Veggel 7h Lecture and meeting (4h), working on the app (2.5h), second meeting (1.5h) making informed consent form (0.5h)
Week 5 Total hours Tasks done (incl. hours per task)
Geert Boer 7,5h Lecture meeting, and focus group (4h), plan screens (1h), second meeting (1.5h), calender (1h)
Roel Domensino 7h Lecture, meeting, and focus group (4h), competition chat screen (1h), reward screens and videos for exercises (2h)
Daan Kuijpers 6.5h Meeting (2h), Rewards wheel adjusted (0.5h), Working on app (4h)
Louise Rietra 10.5h Lecture, meeting, and focus group (4h), TAM research, introduction, continuing report, and summarize the main points focus group (2.5h), second meeting (1.5h), screens for beginner and setting personal goals (1h), cleaning and adjusting wiki (1.5h)
Chris Smeets 6h Lecture, meeting, and focus group (4h), Incorporating timer (0.5h), second meeting (1.5h)
Thijn van Veggel 8.5h Meetings (4h), Focus group preparation and execution (3h), Working on Figma (1.5h)
Week 6 Total hours Tasks done (incl. hours per task)
Geert Boer 7.5h Meetings (4h), making screens and connecting to flow (1.5h), making final google forms (2h)
Roel Domensino 7.5h Meetings (4h), making screens (1.5h), Substantiate choices with literature (2h)
Daan Kuijpers 7h Meeting (4h), making final google forms (2h), fixing errors in app (1h)
Louise Rietra 7.5h Meetings (4h), interview (0.5h), set-up interview questions (1h), Write TAM part (2h)
Chris Smeets 8h Meetings (4h), creation tutorial (4h)
Thijn van Veggel 7h Meetings (4h), make a list of all choices being made and categorize them (1h), analyse the results from the focus group and write down all answers neatly (2h)
Week 7 Total hours Tasks done (incl. hours per task)
Geert Boer
Roel Domensino 8h Meetings (4h), Fixing all connections in Figma and organizing Figma (2h), organizing wiki and adding methods (2h)
Daan Kuijpers 6.5h Meetings (4h), Gathering results from last survey (1.5h), Finalizing App (1h)
Louise Rietra 6h Meetings (4h), organizing wiki and adjusting results (2h)
Chris Smeets 6.5h Meetings (4h), preparation presentation (2.5h)
Thijn van Veggel 6.5h Meetings (4h), preparation presentation (2.5h)
Week 8 Total hours Tasks done (incl. hours per task)
Geert Boer
Roel Domensino 4.5h Watching presentations(2h), Finalizing wiki(2.5h)
Daan Kuijpers 3.5h Watching presentations(2h), Writing part wiki + reading wiki (1.5h)
Louise Rietra 3h Watching presentation (2h), finish references and finalize the introduction (1h)
Chris Smeets 3h Watching presentation (2h), Reading wiki (1h)
Thijn van Veggel 3h Watching presentation (2h), Reading wiki (1h)
Retrieved from "https://dsdwiki.wtb.tue.nl/index.php?title=PRE2023_3_Group8&oldid=126590"