PRE2020 4 Group1

From Control Systems Technology Group
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Project Title t.b.d.

<div#bodyContent sup { 

   font-size: smaller;
   vertical-align: baseline;
   position: relative;
   bottom: 0.33em;

}

  1. bodyContent sub {
   font-size: smaller;
   vertical-align: baseline;
   position: relative;
   bottom: -0.25em;;

}>


Team members

Members Student ID Faculty E-mail
Kashan Alidjan 1224924 Electrical Engineering k.m.s.alidjan@student.tue.nl
Sijt Hooghwinkel 1228761 Automotive s.j.c.hooghwinkel@student.tue.nl
Damaris Jongbloed 1241057 Computer Science d.a.jongbloed@student.tue.nl
Emma van Oppen 0963999 Computer Science e.y.v.oppen@student.tue.nl
Laura Verbeek 1428063 Biomedical Engineering l.h.e.verbeek@student.tue.nl

Introduction

In 2020 the Dutch government spent 8.9 billion euros on roads, railways and waterways.[1] In the Netherlands, there are 125,575 kilometres of roads, which amounts to 27000 euros per km. People new to the Netherlands often claim how well-maintained our roads are, and the Netherlands ranks second in road quality worldwide.[2] Road quality is valued highly in the Netherlands due to a large number of cyclists. Minor damage will not be noticeable in a large car, but small cracks can lead to dangerous situations on a bicycle. [3] To keep the roads in such great condition, a lot or work is done. Municipalities, provinces and the Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management work round the clock to repair damage, but they all use a different system. Most damage is detected by periodic checks, road workers and civilian complaints. To improve the efficiency and cost of these detections, this project intends to present a solution that passively detects damage and stores this in a central database, to be inspected by the responsible parties.

In order to investigate the need of such a device, a survey was sent out to municipalities, asking them if they see a need for such a detection device. 30 out of 49 replies indicated that a global detection system could be an improvement, and more in depth feedback was provided. For example, most municipalities use the CROW mechanism to decide priority of repair. Furthermore, civilian complaints were done in different interfaces, such as BuitenBeterApp, Fixi or the Meld & Herstel app. The main problems indicated in the survey was that different municipalities have different budgets for repair, there could be too many or too little detections (due to inaccuracies) and all damage requires manual inspection anyway.

Objectives

The main objective of this project is to develop a device that measures road surface quality by detecting irregularities in the pavement, such as potholes and cracks, that are encountered while driving around. This device can be placed onto a vehicle and will collect data on these irregularities using several different sensors, such as an accelerometer and a GPS module.

Through the use of crowdsourcing, the collected data, along with GPS locations, can be used to visualize the locations of potholes, cracks and other damage to the road’s surface, thus creating a mapping of the overall road quality. This data can be used to quickly assess where the damage is the most severe and which roads are in need of repair. As such, road maintenance can be planned more immediately when problem areas are detected, which can contribute to an increase in road safety.

  1. Collect data on potential locations of potholes, cracks and other road surface damage.
  2. Visualize the locations of detected road damage by overlaying the collected data on a map.
  3. Enable quick assessment of where the damage is most severe and repair is necessary.
  4. The device must be cost effective to enable widespread usage.

USE analysis

Users

The public roads in The Netherlands are not maintained by one organization. The management is mainly shared between Rijkswaterstaat (highways), provinces and local municipalities. The two latter are responsible for the “N” roads, non-highway roads.

People that have the device installed on their vehicle can be considered as passive users as they do not have to interact directly with the device if they wish. They will need to monitor the physical state of the device and have the device replaced/repaired if needed. The users can also actively interact with the App to see their contribution and edit wrongful detections of the system (false positives) or add locations where the system has not detected anything (false negatives).

Responsible organization for different roads, Leusden, The Netherlands

Society

Societal stakeholders are all road users.

Enterprise

If a road repair needs to be done a contractor will be used to perform this repair.

Depending on the means of installation and technical knowledge that is required to perform installation (TBD!), this may need to be done by a garage. Several garages could be selected to have an inventory of the devices to install on customers cars during their general inspection (APK) or with a service.

Car insurance companies are also stakeholders in this project. Car owners could make use of their insurance policy to claim for damages on their vehicle because of bad roads. Better quality roads would mean insurance companies would have to compensate fewer people.

State of the art / Research

TODO

The links to all the State of the art research are shown in the appendix

Plan

Approach & Milestones

To meet our goals, we subdivided our research into 12 milestones. For each milestone, a short description is given to clarify what needs to be done to reach the milestone.

  1. Find a subject: to do the project, we need to determine the subject that we will focus on. For this, we should think about what type of research we want to conduct (e.g. literature analysis, experimenting, designing, building a prototype…). Other things to keep in mind are:
    1. What are the strengths and weaknesses of the group?
    2. Which projects are possible to do within 8 weeks?
  2. Literature study: the second milestone is to gain knowledge about the possibilities already used for our problem. In this literature study, we will look at the State-of-the-Art, and what the pros and cons are of these solutions to the problem. This knowledge can be applied to improve our own research.
  3. Conceptual design: in the third step, we make multiple designs for the problem. For each design we will look at the pros and cons to find the best design. We can choose the best design or combine the strengths of multiple designs to form a new concept.
  4. Functional description: once we know what the concept will look like, we need to figure out which components are needed to build the main parts of the design, and we have to look up which components/materials are available in the store or online. For example: how is the product supplied with power? A battery? An accu? Furthermore, we should start working on the software.
  5. Final design concept: using the knowledge about the materials found in (4), functional description, we should revise the conceptual design and make some adjustments if needed. The conceptual design will be refined to make the final design concept.
  6. Detailing: the next step is detailing, which means that we should look at the specifications of all the components. Using the same example as in (4), functional description, which battery or accu is sufficient to keep the product working for an X amount of time. In this step it is also important to look at the dimensions of all the components to fit them all in the casing.
  7. Mock-up: making a mock-up of the concept using cheap materials and/or a CAD design.
  8. Software: once the functional description is made, a start should be made on the software. The software should be finished before the realization (9).
  9. Realization: once we are satisfied with the prototype, we should order the components and start building the concept (make a BOM). First all components should be tested independently before putting the concept together. Hardware and software are combined.
  10. Testing: the prototype should be tested. (Minor) adjustments can be made in the software and/or hardware to refine the product.
  11. Results and evaluation: evaluation of the results of the test will give insight in the quality of the product. Possible areas of improvements are mentioned in the evaluation, as well as the strengths of the design.
  12. Final presentation and discussion: finalize the wiki page and prepare for the final presentation.


Deliverables

The deliverables for this project consist of the following items:

  1. The physical prototype
  2. An app that collects the data output of the product
  3. A demonstration of the product, shown during the video presentation
  4. The wiki page containing main topics, such as:
    1. Problem statement
    2. USE aspects
    3. Product
    4. Planning
  5. A video presentation regarding the product, process and most important findings.


Planning

Week Milestone Milestone name Task Responsible Deadline
1 1 Find a subject Brainstorm All 25-4
2 Literature study All 25-4
2 2 Literature study Finish literature Emma, Laura 29-4
3 Conceptual design Sketch app Emma, Sijt 2-5
3 Conceptual design Sketch physical design Kashan, Laura 2-5
3 Conceptual design High level interaction (USE diagram) Damaris 2-5
1 Find a subject Problem definition rewrite Emma, Laura 2-5
1 Find a subject Problem definition research All 2-5
3 4 Functional description All (tbd) 6-5
5 Final design concept All (tbd) 9-5
4 6 Detailing All (tbd) 13-5
8 Software Emma, Sijt 16-5
Order parts Tbd 16-5
5 7 Mock-up Kashan, Laura, Damaris 23-5
8 Software Emma, Sijt 23-5
10 Testing Testplan, perform tests All 23-5
6 9 Realization Perfect product Kashan, Laura, Damaris 30-5
7 11 Results and evaluation All 6-6
12 Presentation and discussion All 6-6
8 Overtime All 13-6

Logbook

Week 1

Name Student ID Time spent Tasks
Kashan Alidjan 1224924 7.5h Intro (1h), Meeting (3h), Research (1.5h), Reading old projects (1h), Deliverables (0.5h), SoTA (0.5h)
Sijt Hooghwinkel 1228761 7h Intro (1h), Meeting (3h), Reading old projects (1h), Users (2h)
Damaris Jongbloed 1241057 7.5h Intro (1h), Meeting (3h), Research (1.5h), Problem statement (2h)
Emma van Oppen 0963999 8.5h Intro (1h), Meeting (3h), Research (3h), Objectives(1h), Wiki(0.5h)
Laura Verbeek 1428063 9h Intro (1h), Meeting (3h), Approach+milestones (2.5h), SotA (2.5h)

Week 2

Name Student ID Time spent Tasks
Kashan Alidjan 1224924 9h Meeting (3h), Design (1.5h), SotA summaries (2h), preparation (2h), wiki (0.5h)
Sijt Hooghwinkel 1228761 8h Meeting (3h), Android studio (1h), researching OSM (1h), SotA summaries(3h)
Damaris Jongbloed 1241057 7h Meeting 27-4 (1h), Meeting 29-4 (2h), Proofreading (0.5h), SotA (3h), Update planning (0.5h)
Emma van Oppen 0963999 14h Meeting (3h), Research/SotA (9.5h), Wiki (0.5h), App Setup (1h)
Laura Verbeek 1428063 10.5h Meeting (3h), reading the work of others (0.5h), SotA (5.5h), Design (1.5h)

Week 3

Name Student ID Time spent Tasks
Kashan Alidjan 1224924
Sijt Hooghwinkel 1228761
Damaris Jongbloed 1241057
Emma van Oppen 0963999
Laura Verbeek 1428063

Week 4

Name Student ID Time spent Tasks
Kashan Alidjan 1224924
Sijt Hooghwinkel 1228761
Damaris Jongbloed 1241057
Emma van Oppen 0963999
Laura Verbeek 1428063

Week 5

Name Student ID Time spent Tasks
Kashan Alidjan 1224924
Sijt Hooghwinkel 1228761
Damaris Jongbloed 1241057
Emma van Oppen 0963999
Laura Verbeek 1428063

Week 6

Name Student ID Time spent Tasks
Kashan Alidjan 1224924
Sijt Hooghwinkel 1228761
Damaris Jongbloed 1241057
Emma van Oppen 0963999
Laura Verbeek 1428063

Week 7

Name Student ID Time spent Tasks
Kashan Alidjan 1224924
Sijt Hooghwinkel 1228761
Damaris Jongbloed 1241057
Emma van Oppen 0963999
Laura Verbeek 1428063

Week 8

Name Student ID Time spent Tasks
Kashan Alidjan 1224924
Sijt Hooghwinkel 1228761
Damaris Jongbloed 1241057
Emma van Oppen 0963999
Laura Verbeek 1428063

Appendix

Links of the State of the Art research:

  1. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323869604_Assessing_and_Mapping_of_Road_Surface_Roughness_based_on_GPS_and_Accelerometer_Sensors_on_Bicycle-Mounted_Smartphones
  2. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334351968_A_participatory_sensing_framework_to_classify_road_surface_quality
  3. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13349-019-00323-0
  4. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9293169
  5. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312960684_Methods_of_Assessment_of_Accuracy_of_Road_Surface_Roughness_Measurement_with_Profilometer
  6. https://trid.trb.org/view/1588970
  7. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266387427_RoadMonitor_An_Intelligent_Road_Surface_Condition_Monitoring_System
  8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474034616301197
  9. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328225081_Pavement_Distress_Detection_Methods_A_Review
  10. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/mpe/2015/869627/
  11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308626536_Measuring_and_evaluating_of_road_roughness_conditions_with_a_compact_road_profiler_and_ArcGIS
  12. https://etrr.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s12544-019-0380-6#citeas
  13. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261132505_Automated_Sensing_System_for_Monitoring_of_Road_Surface_Quality_by_Mobile_Devices
  14. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260390263_A_Mobile_Application_for_Road_Surface_Quality_Control_UNIquALroad
  15. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273672951_Measurement_of_International_Roughness_Index_by_Using_Z_-Axis_Accelerometers_and_GPS
  16. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301298561_RoADS_A_Road_Pavement_Monitoring_System_for_Anomaly_Detection_Using_Smart_Phones
  17. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-13-6577-5_48
  18. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328838759_Road_Surface_Monitoring_Using_Smartphone_SensorsA_Review
  19. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/869627
  20. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9294684
  21. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271700011_SmartRoadSense_Collaborative_Road_Surface_Condition_Monitoring
  22. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Alfred-Brendel/publication/328043550_Smart_Infrastructure_Monitoring_Development_of_a_Decision_Support_System_for_Vision-Based_Road_Crack_Detection/links/5bb4a8eda6fdccd3cb84f097/Smart-Infrastructure-Monitoring-Development-of-a-Decision-Support-System-for-Vision-Based-Road-Crack-Detection.pdf
  23. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322787719_Road_Damage_Detection_Using_Deep_Neural_Networks_with_Images_Captured_Through_a_Smartphone
  24. https://www.ri.cmu.edu/pub_files/2011/10/RoadMonitor_Mertz_ITSWC2011_final.pdf
  25. https://medium.com/@percepsense/intelligent-pothole-detection-879ef635dd38
  26. https://springml.com/blog/using-object-detection-potholes/

References

  1. ↑ Dutch Government. (2019). Summary of the 2020 Budget Memorandum.
  2. ↑ Schwab, K. (2019). The Global Competitiveness Report 2019.
  3. ↑ Wagenbuur, M (2014). How come there are no potholes in the Netherlands?.
Retrieved from "https://dsdwiki.wtb.tue.nl/index.php?title=PRE2020_4_Group1&oldid=115162"