PRE2018 3 Group9

Preface

Group Members

Name	Study	Student ID
Claudiu Ion	Software Science	1035445
Endi Selmanaj	Electrical Engineering	1283642
Martijn Verhoeven	Electrical Engineering	1233597
Leo van der Zalm	Mechanical Engineering	1232931

Initial Concepts

After discussing various topics we came up with this final list of projects that seemed interesting to us.

• Drone interception
• A tunnel digging robot
• A fire fighting drone for finding people
• Delivery uav - (blood in Africa, parcels, medicine, etc.)
• Voice control robot - (general technique that has many applications)
• A spider robot that can be used to get to hard to reach places

Chosen Project: Drone Interception

Introduction

According to the most recent industry forecast studies, the unmanned aerial systems (UAS) market is expected to reach 4.7 million units by 2020. Nevertheless, regulations and technical challenges need to be addressed before such unmanned aircraft become as common and accepted by the public as their manned counterpart. The impact of an air collision between an UAS and a manned aircraft is a concern to both the public and government officials at all levels. All around the world, the primary goal of enforcing rules for UAS operations into the national airspace is to assure an appropriate level of safety. Therefore, research is needed to determine airborne hazard impact thresholds for collisions between unmanned and manned aircraft or even collisions with people on the ground as this study already shows..

With the recent developments of small and cheap electronics unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are becoming more affordable for the public and we are seeing an increase in the number of drones that are flying in the sky. This has started to pose a number of potential risks which may jeopardize not only our daily lives but also the security of various high values assets such as airports, stadiums or similar protected airspaces. The latest incident involving a drone which invaded the airspace of an airport took place in December 2018 when Gatwick airport had to be closed and hundreds of flights were cancelled following reports of drone sightings close to the runway. The incident caused major disruption and affected about 140000 passengers and over 1000 flights. This was the biggest disruption since ash from an Icelandic volcano shut down all traffic across Europe in 2010.

Tests performed at the University of Dayton Research Institute show the even a small drone can cause major damage to an airliner’s wing if they meet at more than 300 kilometers per hour.

Problem Statement

The problem statement is: How can UAS be used to quickly intercept and stop other UAVs in airborne situations.

A UAV is defined as an unmanned aerial vehicle and differs from a UAS in one major way: a UAV is just referring to the aircraft itself, not the ground control and communications units.

Objectives

• Determine the best UAS that can intercept another UAV in airborne situations
• Improve the chosen concept
• Create a design for the improved concept, including software and hardware
• Build a prototype
• Make an evaluation based on the prototype

Project Organisation

Approach

• Doing research on our chosen project using SotA literature analysis
• Determine users and requirements
• Consider multiple design strategies
• Work on design (soft and hardware)
• Work on prototype (soft and hardware)
• Evaluate prototype

Milestones

Within this project there are three major milestones:

• After week 2, the best UAS is chosen, options for improvements of this system are made and also there is a clear vision on the user. This means that it is known who the users are and what their requirements are.
• After week 5, the software and hardware are designed for the improved system. Also a prototype has been made.
• After week 8, the wiki page is finished and updated with the results that were found from testing the prototype. Also future developments are looked into and added to the wiki page.

Deliverables

• This wiki page, which contains all of our research and findings
• A presentation, which is a summary of what was done and what our most important results are
• A prototype

Planning

Name	Week #1	Week #2	Week #3	Week #4	Week #5	Week #6	Week #7	Week #8
	Research	Requirements and USE Analysis	Hardware Design	Software Design	Prototype / Concept	Proof Reading	Future Developments	Conclusions
Claudiu Ion	Make a draft planning	Add requirements for drone on wiki page	Research hardware components	Write pseudocode for interceptor drone	Mobile app development	Proof read the wiki page and correct mistakes	Review wiki page	Make a final presentation
	Summarize project ideas	Research about the SotA	Research building drones at scale	Build UML diagram for software architecture		Review wiki page
	Write wiki introduction			Start design for dashboard mobile app		Mobile app development
	Find 5 research papers
	Add papers to wiki page
Endi Selmanaj
Martijn Verhoeven	Find 6 or more research papers	Improve SotA	Research hardware options	Start on 3D model of drone	Deliver 3D model of drone	Review wiki page	Finalise wiki page
	Fill in draft planning	Requirements	Start thinking about electronics layout
	Write about objectives	USE analysis
Leo van der Zalm	Find 6 or more research papers	Proces feedback on objectives and prob.	Proces feedback on state of. and put in on wiki	Start working on drone prototype	Make a bill of costs and list of parts	Review wiki page	Continue tasks from week 7	Finish all lose ends
	Search information about subject	Add finished obj. and prob. to wiki	Research on the frame and looks of the drone		Finish prototype	Put in new devellopmets from week 3, 4 and 5	Write future developmetns	Write conclusion/results part
	Write problem statements	Expand state of the art	Research on different components of the drone			Start looking at the final presentation
	Write objectives
Group Work	Introduction	Expand on the requirements	Research hardware components	Interface design for the mobile app	Drone prototype
	Brainstorming ideas	Expand on the state of the art	Research different systems for stopping drones	Start working on drone prototype	Build 3d model of the drone
	Find papers (5 per member)	Society and enterprise needs		Start working on 3d drone model	Research into building a drone
	User needs and user impacts				Research into the costs involved
	Define the USE aspects
Milestones	Decide on research topic	Add requirements to wiki page	USE analysis finished		Provide a bill of costs and list of parts
	Add research papers to wiki page	Add state of the art to wiki page
	Write introduction for wiki page
	Wiki page structure
	Finish planning
Deliverables					3D drone model	Mobile app prototype		Final presentation
								Wiki page

USE

There are a lot of stakeholders associated with the use of Interception Drones. It affects its users, the society, the enterprise and the engineers. Each of these stakeholders’ experiences different concerns, which are going to be elaborated separately.

Users

Most of the users of Interception Drones are big organizations such as governments or large companies, but it can also find use on smaller businesses and individuals. Firstly, such drones would provide a huge utility to governments. As drone technology is advancing with huge steps, they have seen more and more use on governmental spying, with the intent of getting classified information on places where it is hard for men to reach. The implementation of such interception drones would mean that the government can secure itself from getting confidential information taken from other drones, operated by other people or governments with malicious purposes. Drones cannot only be programmed to spy but also, they can be used to execute deadly attacks on single targets or a group of people. It is important for governments to protect certain high importance personalities but also protect the people it represents, making interception drones a solution to this problem.

Another user of interception drones are the large organizations and firms, that could be a target of aerial assault or intervention by drones or other flying objects. Organizations that possess high sensitivity information or want to protect very highly individuals to their business have to make their best efforts to guarantee the security of such assaults. This is the case that interception drones would be the best solution, as they offer high flexibility. Flying drones can also possess risk on the operation of such places as airports, causing millions of dollars of costs and huge delays, such as in the example of Gatwick Airport in London, where flights were delayed for 24 hours, because of an unidentified drone flying around the airport. This could have easily been avoided with the use of interception drones, saving the airport a lot of money and guaranteeing the passengers to arrive at their destination on time.

Interception drones can also find use by individuals who are prone to get targeted by paparazzi and the media to get more information on their private life. There have been a lot of cases where drones have been used to interfere with the private life of celebrities. An example of that and successful interception of the drone is the case of Roman Abrahamovich, a billionaire from Russia, whose yacht was approached by a drone operated by a person standing on the shore . The drone was intercepted by a machine, which intercepted the RC signals, but was manually operated from the employees of the yacht. An interception drone would be a better solution in this case, as it could offer an autonomous solution even when no one is paying attention or when it is night time and visibility is a problem.

Society

Interception Drones offer added security to the society. It prevents the capture of information by random drone users by intercepting these drones so that the private information can stay like that. It guarantees the members of the society that their information and security are being protected and it adds to the trust of the society in the government. One problem that occurs with the implementation of interception drones is that every drone, with malicious intent or not, can be a prey of the interception drone, discouraging the recreational use of drones.

Enterprise and the Engineers

To enterprises, the implementation and commercialization of interception drones would mean higher income and profits. It would create a sub-industry to the already growing drone industry. Also, since the majority of buyers would be governments, big organizations or rich individuals, it could turn big profits for the enterprises.

Although it can be highly lucrative for the enterprise, such interception drones can possess difficulties for the engineers designing them. Firstly, the engineers should make sure that the interception drone identifies all the time the presence of another drone and false positives are as low as possible, as they can result in high costs. Another challenge that the implementation of interception drones is the flight time that a drone can have. Since they require a lot of power at the moment drone flight times are almost most of the time under 40 minutes and it is also the case in these drones as if they want to actually intercept an attacking drone they need to be really powerful. Engineers might need to develop a method so that the drones spend as little energy as possible or that they can hold more battery capacity.

State of the Art (SotA)

In this section the State of the Art (or SotA) concerning our project will be discussed.

One way of catching a drone is by shooting at it with a net. Extensive research has been done on shooting nets, mainly for wildlife purposes

In order to aim at a moving target from a moving drone, a way of tracking the target is needed. Multiple ways of doing this have been researched:

• Live image processing
• Radar based systems
• Ground based live image analysis

If we look at intercepting another drone, this is done autonomously. References to different articles on autonomous flying:

• On board navigation
• Design and control of quadrotors
• Autonomous indoor flying
• Agressive maneuvering
• Path-following
• Aerial object following

Research Articles, Patents and Relevant Sources

Apart from the various research papers on the topic of interceptor drones, there are also several patents and relevant articles for such systems.

• Patent for an interceptor drone tasked to the location of another tracked drone. This patent proposes a system which includes a LIDAR camera which provides detection and tracking of an intruder drone.
• Patent for autonomous tracking and surveilance. This patent refers to a method of protecting an asset by imposing a security perimiter around it which is further divided in a number of zones protected by unmanned aerial vehicles.
• Patent for detecting, tracking and estimating the speed of vehicles from a moving platform. This patent proposes an algorithm operated by the on-board computing system of an unmanned aerial vehicle that is used to detect and track vehicles moving on a roadway. The algorithm is configured to detect and track the vehicles despite motion created by movement of the UAV.
• Patent for scanning environments and tracking unmanned aerial vehicles. This patent refers to systems and methods for scanning environments and tracking unmanned aerial vehicles within the scanned environments. It also provides a method for identifying points of interest in an image and generating a map of the region.
• Patent for flight control using computer vision. This patent provides methods for computing a three-dimensional relative location of a target with respect to the reference aerial vehicle based on the image of the environment.

There is also an existing company, in Delft, that is making drone intercepting drones called Delft Dynamics and they have built the DroneCatcher