PRE2018 3 Group5
General info
Group members
| Name | Student ID |
|---|---|
| Ruben Haakman | 0993994 |
| Stan Latten | 1257196 |
| Tom Mulders | 1008890 |
| Jasper Stam | 1006240 |
| Mathijs Vastenhouw | 1269496 |
Problem
To keep residential areas clean and neat, lots of tools are used. Most of the tools are operated by humans, but some new tools can do some tasks autonomous. Can't this be done by one autonomous robot? We think the most common tasks can be performed by an autonomous robot.
When farmers grow crops, the have to deal with weeds growing on their fields in between their crops. To remove these weeds, pesticides are used. These pesticides can be harmful to insects, animals and humans and might even contaminate (ground)water. Clearly an alternative is needed.
Problem statement
In the current situation, a lot of pesticides are used in farming. These pesticides are used for treating bugs and diseases, but also for weeds. With the trend to be more environmentally friendly, we are looking for alternatives for pesticides and big farm trucks. A possible solution for this problem is a cooperation of small autonomous farming machines, which can control a field together. However, this solution is not new, people have already been working on the navigation of these small machines and on the detection of weeds in fields of crops. [1] That’s why we will try to make a weed picking device to be able to pick weeds without damaging the crops. For these small devices, we see future in the vertical agriculture as well, because they allow for a higher field density.
Objectives
- The system must have the ability to do tasks, like lawn mowing and trash picking
- The system must be able to go autonomous to the place, where the task has to be performed
- The system has to give a warning to the owner in case of technical disorder
- The system has to ask for help of human if needed
- The system must have the ability to collect trash
- The system should have the ability to reach narrow places
- The system could have the ability to drop the trash on some location without the help of human
- The system could have the ability to attend the owner on many trash (full trash can)
RPCs
Requirements
- The system recharges autonomously
- The system must be able to differentiate crops from weeds
- The system removes weed from the farm field and collects it for disposal
- The system moves itself around the farmfield, following a predefined pattern unique for each farmfield
Preferences
- The system can operate for a long time before having to recharge
- The system should make minimal errors in recognizing weeds
- The system can work with 3D patterns, allowing applications in 'farm flats', reducing land area use
Constraints
- The system has to be more cost-efficient than human workers
- The system has to be intelligent, has to know what to do
- The system does never run out of power, has to return to the recharging station in time
- The system does not use pesticides
Users and other stakeholders
- Municipalities: responsible to maintain the residential area
- Citizens: clean and safe neighborhood
- People that are maintaining the neighborhood: can focus on other tasks, that currently would not be done
- Society as a whole
- Enterprises that specialize in maintenance of public grounds
- City cleaning service (user): easier cleaning of the city center and better for human, because they have to stoop less to pick up trash under obstacles, like benches
- Shop owners: cleaner and more attractive city center. More customers leads to more sales.
- Shoppers: cleaner and less inconvenience of people that are trying to get the ground under your bench clean.
- Farmers
- Consumers
- Governments
- Society
Project setup
Approach
After reviewing the literature, we will determine the requirements for the system. Based on these requirements we will investigate implementations for these requirements and analyse their suitability. We will analyse the costs associated with a solution and compare this to the current costs of using pesticides, the effects on the stakeholders and on the future of farming. Finally we will conclude with a recommendation for or against the automated removal of weeds on farm fields without the use of pesticides and recommend future research topics.
Milestones
- State-of-the-art analysis
- Requirements Document
- Use analysis
- Implementation propositions
- Implementation analysis
- Cost analysis
- Conclusion
Deliverables
- Requirements document
- Implementation document
- Use analysis
- Cost analysis
- Conclusion
Who's doing what
- Ruben: Design(electronics), cost analysis.
- Stan: Design(general), Requirements, Use analysis.
- Tom: Design(general), Requirements, Use analysis.
- Jasper: Design(software), STOA analysis, Requirements, Use analysis.
- Mathijs: Design(general), STOA analysis, cost analysis.
State of the art
The literature study can be found on the page State of the art
Planning
For each week, there are points what we plan to do in that week. Planning can change over the weeks, dependent on the progress in the project. Final versions of the documents will be delivered at the end of the quartile, but concept versions will be delivered earlier.
Week 1
- Introduction to course
- Brainstorming about problem
- Make problem statement
- First idea on plan for project
- Literature study on problem
Week 2
- Updated problem description
- Concrete planning for project
- Make plan more clear with introduction
- Analysis of literature found in week 1
- First idea on requirements
- Start on USE stakeholder analysis
Week 3
- Concrete decisions on prototype
- USE stakeholder analysis
- Make requirements ready to start on design
Week 4-6
- Work on prototype
- Analysis of requirements based on prototype and update if needed
- Analysis of decisions made for prototype and update if needed
- Update other documents if needed
Week 7
- Finalize prototype
- Prepare presentation
Week 8
- Presentation
Function definition and concepts
Function definition and concepts g5