Embedded Motion Control 2013 Group 9
Group members
| Name: | Student id: | Email: |
| Jeroen Lamers | 0771264 | j.w.lamers@student.tue.nl |
| Rens Samplonius | 0785119 | r.j.samplonius@student.tue.nl |
| Haico Ploegmakers | 0775395 | h.e.c.w.ploegmakers@student.tue.nl |
| Frank Evers | 0789890 | f.evers@student.tue.nl |
| Filipe Catarino | 0821789 | f.freire.catarino@student.tue.nl |
Planning
| Week: | Activities: | People: |
| Week 1 |
|
Everbody |
| Week 2 |
|
|
| Week 3 |
|
|
| Week 4 |
|
|
| Week 5 |
|
|
| Week 6 | ... | |
| Week 7 | Not yet planned |
Progress
Week 1: September 2 - September 8
The first week mainly consisted of installing the Ubuntu OS with all the required ROS/Gazebo software. This did not went smoothly as there is no easy available Ubuntu installation for Mac (1 member) and missing one tiny step in the Tutorials could end up with a not working environment.
It was decided that everyone should do all the tutorials to know how everything works, and that we would work with the software provided by the course material (QT for c++ and fuerte Ros).
Week 2: September 9 - September 15
During the second week everyone finished the tutorials for ROS and c++.
Robot Sensors
Researching the given example with the simulation environment shows that the laser data is acquired by scanning in a 270 degree angle with increments of 0.25 degrees. This information is saved in a a vector and can be used to obtain distances for every angle at a certain time.
Week 3: September 16 - September 22
The third week consisted of 2 parts:
- Creating the architecture of the system, by dividing all the necessary steps into functions.
- Focus on the corridor competition
System functions & Architecture
The group was split into two teams where 2 people where focusing on the architecture of the system. By doing this early it is clear how the system is going to be created. There is one main file that is able to call for all different functions that are required for the situation at hand. The focus of course is on the basic functions of the system for the corridor competition. These functions are:
- Driving in a straight line in the middle of the corridor
- Detecting the corner on either the left or the right side
- Turn into the corner and leave the corridor
- Stop outside the corridor
Corridor Competition concept
Because the contest dictates that the robot will be between the walls, and facing the end of the competition, the idea is that the robot is able to drive forward into the corridor. Because the robot is put there by human hand, and walls might not be exactly parallel there has to be some kind of control. By measuring the closest distance to the walls with the laser, the robot is able to calculate where the middle of the corridor is. The laser is then also used to calculate the angle between the robot and the wall.
The concept program for the corridor competition is drawn in the following schematic:
To make this program possible, the system has a main loop with a case switch. This will activate the functions that are required at that moment. When for example the corner is detected it will switch to that function.
Driving Straight: To drive straight the robot measures the closest distance to each wall and also the corresponding angle. Using this information the orientation of the robot and the position in the corridor is determined. Using a controller, the robot will drive forward and correct its position until it is moving forward in the middle of the corridor.
Corner Detection: The corner is detected by looking at an angle of 90 degrees. If there is a sudden change in that distance (opening in the wall) the system will switch to the corner function.
Turn into Corner: After detecting the corner, it will drive while keeping the corner at the same distance. After this it will drive straight until the walls disappear and stop.
Week 4: September 23 - September 29
Test on the Robot
After we created a program for the Corridor Competition, the simulation showed good results. By running the program with the robot in various positions in the Corridor we concluded that the program was functioning properly. After that came the testing on the Robot. There were a lot of problems with the Robot. For that reason we were not able to have normal testing until one day before the contest.
In the end the tests on the robot were successful. The Robot was able to drive straight trough the corridor, however due to the hysteresis, friction and the low values on the controller it drove in a stretched S-shape, like a snake. The corner however was very smooth.
The Competition
After some problems where the robot would turn after initialization, the competition was a success in the second try. Group 9 set the third time of 4 groups what were able to finish the competition.
<br\>
Strategy
After the competition and a brainstorm session we came to the conclusion that this method is only effective for straight corridors with single exits. Watching the maze that is provided with the simulation is is clear that there are a lot of different types of situations. Also decisions on where to at certain junctions is not supported by the current code. Therefor the strategy should contain 'mapping'. This way there is a way to detect the path in front of the robot while also saving everthing that was discovered before. This should prevent driving into allready explored parts.
Week 5: September 30 - October 6
This week we started with a totally new design for the pico software architecture. For the corridor competition we only focused on a particular task, driving straight and take one corner. In the real maze more functions and software features will be required. We started by separating the existing code in even more individual functions. We split our group in 3 subgroups
- Frank and Filipe look into analyzing of the laser data and come up with a matrix of “edges” from which lines can be determined.
- Rens and Jeroen will use this information to determine a trajectory through the junctions based on “nodes”.
- Haico wil look into the arrow detection with the camera.
Finding 'Hard Points'