Embedded Motion Control 2014 Group 7: Difference between revisions
Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td>6</td><td>30-05-2014</td><td>Conceptual version of all modules are finished</td><td></td><td></td> | <td>6</td><td>26-05-2014</td><td>Research functionality of ROS Packages: Gmapping and move_base</td><td></td><td></td> | ||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td></td><td>28-05-2014</td><td>Decide: use of packages or write complete new code</td><td></td><td></td> | |||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td></td><td>30-05-2014</td><td>Conceptual version of all modules are finished</td><td></td><td></td> | |||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Revision as of 13:08, 25 May 2014
Group members
Name | |
---|---|
Maurice van de Ven | m dot l dot j dot v dot d dot ven @ student dot tue dot nl |
Pim Duijsens | p dot j dot h dot duijsens @ student dot tue dot nl |
Glenn Roumen | g dot h dot j dot roumen @ student dot tue dot nl |
Wesley Peijnenburg | w dot peijnenburg @ student dot tue dot nl |
Roel Offermans | r dot r dot offermans @ student dot tue dot nl |
Planning
Week | Deadline | General plan | Groupmember | Specific task |
---|---|---|---|---|
4 | 16-05-2014 | Complete Corridor Challenge | ||
- - - - - | - - - - - | - - - - - | - - - - - | - - - - - |
5 | 19-05-2014 | Research Maze Strategies and define modules | ||
19-05-2014 before 10:45 h. | Roel | Research possibilities for wall and corner detection with OpenCV | ||
19-05-2014 before 10:45 h. | Glenn | Research possibilities for wall and corner detection with OpenCV | ||
19-05-2014 before 10:45 h. | Wesley | Research possibilities for arrow detection with OpenCV | ||
19-05-2014 before 10:45 h. | Maurice | Research possibilities for path planning and path tracker/driver | ||
19-05-2014 before 10:45 h. | Pim | Research possibilities for path planning and path tracker/driver | ||
- - - - - | - - - - - | - - - - - | - - - - - | - - - - - |
6 | 26-05-2014 | Research functionality of ROS Packages: Gmapping and move_base | ||
28-05-2014 | Decide: use of packages or write complete new code | |||
30-05-2014 | Conceptual version of all modules are finished | |||
- - - - - | - - - - - | - - - - - | - - - - - | - - - - - |
7 | 06-06-2014 | Integration of the modules | ||
- - - - - | - - - - - | - - - - - | - - - - - | - - - - - |
8 | 13-06-2014 | Final presentation of the Maze Strategy | ||
- - - - - | - - - - - | - - - - - | - - - - - | - - - - - |
9 | 20-06-2014 | Maze Competition |
Progress
Name | Week 3 | Week 4 | Week 5 | Week 6 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Maurice van de Ven | All tutorials, not all C++ | |||
Pim Duijsens | All tutorials, but not all C++ | |||
Glenn Roumen | All tutorials | |||
Wesley Peijnenburg | Tutorial #7 | |||
Roel Offermans | All tutorials, not all C++ |
Time Table
Lectures | Group meetings | Mastering ROS and C++ | Preparing midterm assignment | Preparing final assignment | Wiki progress report | Other activities | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 1 | |||||||
Pim | 2 | ||||||
Roel | 2 | ||||||
Maurice | 2 | ||||||
Wesley | 2 | ||||||
Glenn | 2 | ||||||
Week 2 | |||||||
Pim | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | |||
Roel | 0 | 2 | 10 | 6 | |||
Maurice | 2 | 2 | 6 | 3 | |||
Wesley | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | |||
Glenn | 2 | 2 | 5 | 2 | |||
Week 3 | |||||||
Pim | 2 | 1 | 12 | 2 | |||
Roel | 2 | 4 | 10 | 2 | |||
Maurice | 3 | 10 | 4 | ||||
Wesley | 2 | 3 | 10 | 1 | |||
Glenn | 2 | 2 | 13 | 4 | |||
Week 4 | |||||||
Pim | 2 | 5 | 1 | 7 | 3 | ||
Roel | 2 | 5 | |||||
Maurice | 5 | 15 | |||||
Wesley | 2 | 5 | 9 | 1 | |||
Glenn | 2 | 5 | 6 | 1 |
Different nodes and flow chart
Strategy for the Corridor Challenge
GMapping / SLAM
GMapping is being investigated as SLAM algorithm.
In order to run GMapping and transform the base_frame correctly, the following command should be used;
rosrun gmapping slam_gmapping scan:=/pico/laser _base_frame:=/pico/base_link
Viewing tf tree:
$ rosrun tf view_frames
Runnig Gmapping and move_base:
1. Startup gazebo and pico
2. In same terminal:
$ roscd pico_2ndnav
$ roslaunch move_base.launch
3. In another terminal run gmapping:
rosrun gmapping slam_gmapping scan:=/pico/laser _base_frame:=/pico/base_link _odom_frame:=pico/odom
Remarks
In local_costmap_params.yaml
static_map should be false. (As a local costmap should not be static, it moves with the robot)
In costmap_common_params.yaml
inflation_radius should probably be smaller than 0.55, the robot has a much smaller radius (in safe_drive we used 0.25 if i remember correctly?)
In pico_configuration.launch
We should look very closely to the pkg and type that are used (for example, shouldn't the types end with .msg). Furthermore, it seems like it wants to run the messages as an executable, this is probably not our intention).