PRE2018 3 Group1: Difference between revisions
Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
! scope="col"| Responsible member | ! scope="col"| Responsible member | ||
|- | |- | ||
! scope="row" | ! scope="row" | ||
| Introduction, Problem Definition and Objectives | | Introduction, Problem Definition and Objectives | ||
| 09-02-2019 | | 09-02-2019 | ||
| Niels | | Niels | ||
|- | |- | ||
! scope="row"| Planning, Approach and Milestones | ! scope="row" | ||
| Planning, Approach and Milestones | |||
| 10/02/2019 | | 10/02/2019 | ||
| Rani & Max | | Rani & Max | ||
|- | |- | ||
! scope="row" | State of the Art analysis | ! scope="row" | ||
| State of the Art analysis | |||
| 09-02-2019 | | 09-02-2019 | ||
| Kees & Mart | | Kees & Mart | ||
|- | |- | ||
! scope="row" | USE aspects | ! scope="row" | ||
| USE aspects | |||
| USE aspects | | USE aspects | ||
| Max | | Max |
Revision as of 15:45, 9 February 2019
Group members
Name | Student ID |
---|---|
Max van Mulken | 1006576 |
Mart Hagedoorn | 1 |
Niels Verstappen | 0999624 |
Rani van Hoof | 1026024 |
Kees Voorintholt | 1005136 |
Introduction
This wiki is an information page about a study on a huge problem that is known as the Kessler Syndrome. This Kessler Syndrome is basically a form of cascade failure. It starts with for example two satellites colliding, this collision will cause a lot of debris to fly around in orbital space. This debris will then again collide with other debris, space stations or satellites, which can eventually lead to a shield of debris around the planet earth.
The importance of this problem will be further explained and several solutions will be considered and discussed.
The study is done for a TU Eindhoven course: Robots Everywhere (0LAUK0). While studying this problem and its possible solutions, it is made sure that the 3 USE aspects: User, Society and Enterprise, are central.
Problem definition
As mentioned in the introduction the problem that will be studied is the Kessler Syndrome. In the long term this shield of debris around the earth can have disastrous consequences. Starting with the consequence of not being able to send any new satellites into orbital space as they would get smashed by orbital debris immediately. At the speed of which these objects travel they will just shatter in tons of smaller objects and travel straight ahead. This means that now all these smaller pieces make a cloud of debris of which the total area is bigger than it was before it crashed. This cloud will destroy everything it encounters, only making the cloud of debris bigger and bigger.
But why would this affect the ordinary human being living his life on planet earth, the orbital debris is in space right why would we care? Well at the point where we have no more satellites in orbital space there will be quite some changes to our way of life. How would we make the important business call to a CEO on the other side of the world? How would we know what the weather will be for the coming weeks? All these things will become impossible without satellites.
Also it might seem like a future problem that we could maybe still prevent, however that is not true, in fact it has already started a long time ago. There are numerous reports of orbital debris colliding with satellites or space stations, the US government logged 308.984 close calls and 665 emergency alerts in 2017 alone [1]. Furthermore, on average a satellite crashes to the earth once every week which causes a rain of space junk that will burn up on the way to the earth. However some of this space junk may stay in orbit, which means the amount of orbital debris keeps increasing.
To have some kind of visualization of how much orbital debris is already out there, there are about 650.000 objects between the size of a softball and a fingernail. Next to that there exist approximately 170 million pieces of space junk that are smaller than the tip of a pencil [1]. All of this together with the roughly 23.000 satellites, rocket bodies and other human made objects, make a huge amount of objects flying around in orbit.
So if you had the impression that this problem was not very relevant, think again because it will change our ways of living drastically
Objectives
While studying the subject we have set several objectives for ourselves:
- We want to find as many solutions as we can to clean the orbital debris by using a robot.
- For every possible solution that is considered we want to assess the feasibility, the effectivity and the financial cost. This way we can get a clear image on which of the solutions might be the best.
- We want to show that the best solution is a significant improvement for the Kessler Syndrome by running simulations.
- To support the feasibility of the best solution we will also use visual representations of several simulations.
- The robot has to be autonomous, such that it can operate without a human controlling the robot.
USE aspects
While the problem described above is a very ambitious one to solve entirely, we believe the work we can do in 8 weeks is more than enough to impact multiple stakeholders. We will identify stakeholder groups and look at what our project can do for these groups.
Users
The users of this project are hard to define. Since the project aims to do research at the development of an autonomous robot which cleans up orbital debris, there are no real direct everyday users who will directly be influenced by the success of the project. The real users of the product are most likely going to be enterprises that specialise in “space infrastructure”: enterprises like NASA that launch satellites and other space crafts. Since these enterprises have direct access to the resources to launch objects into space, and have the experience of doing so as well, they are most suited to apply the product if it were ever to be finished.
Society
The product aims to prevent or even solve the problem that the Kessler Syndrome poses, in the extent to which that is still possible. If prevention of or a solution to this problem is no longer possible, it will at least attempt to reduce the consequences and growth of the problem. The Kessler Syndrome poses multiple complications that will influence society in a major way.
Since the Kessler Syndrome will cause everything in orbit to be in danger of being damaged and/or destroyed, it will be very hard for humans to launch and maintain satellites into orbit. This has a number of consequences, since satellites are very important for society today. First of all, they allow us to do a lot of research of the entire solar system and even beyond the solar system, expanding our knowledge of our place between the stars. Perhaps even more important to some people, satellites have allowed us to be way more accurate when predicting weather forecasts and potential storms, which is not only nice when you are planning a camping trip but can also be a lifesaver when it concerns a hurricane prediction. Also, since communication over large distances works in straight lines, satellites have greatly increased the distance over which communication can work correctly, along with increasing quality of communication. Instead of having a direct communication channel between two points which can be blocked by a large building or a mountain, communication via a satellites allow the communication to avoid large obstacles. Society has prospered and greatly benefitted from these communication channels, delivering the Internet, modern television and even radio stations to millions of people around the world. Finally, satellites play a key role in navigation. The GPS (Global Positioning System), which is used by every piece of modern navigation technology, has not only allowed individuals to find their way around but is also used by giant infrastructures like air traffic control, and is used by corporations like Google to provide society with an all-inclusive map of the entire world. It is safe to say that satellites are key to modern society, meaning development of the Kessler Syndrome to disallow satellites would be disastrous.
Later stages of the Kessler Syndrome could form a cloud of space debris in orbit that would make it too dangerous to send any spacecraft either into or past orbit. This not only limits satellites, but we would no longer be able to send out missions to other planets or moons because of a fear of the spacecraft getting destroyed. We as a society would be forever stuck on Earth, unable to accomplish the dreams science-fiction has set out for us.
Enterprise
Enterprises that would suffer from this problem, were it not to be addressed, would be both enterprises that focus on space exploration and any enterprise that benefits from sending satellites into orbit. As discussed above, there are a lot of enterprises which would suffer from a lack of satellites since communication methods would suffer severely. Next to these indirect consequences, more direct consequences are suffered by enterprises like NASA and SpaceX. These enterprises focus on space exploration and flight research to bring multiple benefits and large chunks of knowledge to the general public. Both of these tasks, especially space exploration, will become a lot harder were the close Earth orbit to be home to huge amounts of debris. It would greatly increase the risk of crafts being damaged when send into or beyond orbit. Thus, it is in these enterprise’s best interest that the Kessler Syndrome’s effect is reduced.
State of the Art
References and domain analysis
Approach
Planning
What | Date finished | Responsible member | |
---|---|---|---|
scope="row" | Introduction, Problem Definition and Objectives | 09-02-2019 | Niels |
scope="row" | Planning, Approach and Milestones | 10/02/2019 | Rani & Max |
scope="row" | State of the Art analysis | 09-02-2019 | Kees & Mart |
scope="row" | USE aspects | USE aspects | Max |
Milestones
Date | Milestone | Remarks |
---|---|---|
04/02/2019 | Determine subject for the project | Subject chosen: Cleaning up orbital debris |
10/02/2019 | Finish State of the Art analysis | - |
17/02/2019 | List of possible solutions to the problem | - |
Comparison of the solutions and conclusion on best fit(s) | - | |
Concept design on chosen solutions | - | |
Simulations of chosen solutions | - | |
Comparison of simulated solutions and final conclusion | - |
Division of Work
Deliverables
References
[1] Mosher, D. (2018, april 15). The US government logged 308,984 potential space-junk collisions in 2017 — and the problem could get much worse. Retrieved february 7, 2019, from https://www.businessinsider.com/space-junk-collision-statistics-government-tracking-2017-2018-4?international=true&r=US&IR=T