PRE2018 3 Group7: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
= Introduction = | = Introduction = | ||
As the amount of elderly increases, the | As the amount of elderly increases, the | ||
= Problem Statement = | = Problem Statement = | ||
= Week 1 = | = Week 1 = | ||
== Subject == | == Subject == | ||
== Objectives == | == Objectives == | ||
== Users == | == Users == | ||
== State-of-the-art == | == State-of-the-art == | ||
For the use of care robots as exercise coach different kinds of research have been done. Different methods on how the robot should interact with people have been tested. For example the difference between relational and non-relational robot, where the relational one was preferred over the other <ref>J. Fasola and M. J. Mataric, "Using Socially Assistive Human–Robot Interaction to Motivate Physical Exercise for Older Adults," in Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 100, no. 8, pp. 2512-2526, Aug. 2012. [http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=6235980&isnumber=6239645] </ref>. Or that socially assistive robots positively affect motivation compared to smart environment interfaces such as touch screens <ref> Torta, Elena & Oberzaucher, Johannes & Werner, Franz & Cuijpers, Raymond & Juola, James. (2013). Attitudes Towards Socially Assistive Robots in Intelligent Homes: Results From Laboratory Studies and Field Trials. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction. 1. 76-99. [http://humanrobotinteraction.org/journal/index.php/HRI/article/view/60] </ref>. | |||
But mostly research about the ethical consequences of the use of care robots for elderly people have been done <ref> Bernd Carsten Stahl, Neil McBride, Kutoma Wakunuma, Catherine Flick, The empathic care robot: A prototype of responsible research and innovation, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Volume 84, 2014, Pages 74-85. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.001] | |||
</ref> | |||
But for how to check if the elders do their tasks, not a lot of studies have been done | |||
== Approach == | == Approach == | ||
| Line 48: | Line 62: | ||
Approach, milestones and deliverables + who does what - Ruben | Approach, milestones and deliverables + who does what - Ruben | ||
== References == | |||
<references/> | |||
Y. Matsusaka, H. Fujii, T. Okano and I. Hara, "Health exercise demonstration robot TAIZO and effects of using voice command in robot-human collaborative demonstration," RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Toyama, 2009, pp. 472-477. [http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5326042&isnumber=5326035] | |||
Revision as of 17:45, 7 February 2019
Group members
| Name | Student ID | Major |
|---|---|---|
| Jules Vliem | 1256122 | Electrical Engineering |
| Stijn Verhoeven | 1238464 | Mechanical Engineering |
| Tim Jonkman | 0963139 | Mechanical Engineering |
| Ruben Schmeitz | 1233052 | Mechanical Engineering |
| Jessie Maassen | 1266500 | Computer Science |
Introduction
As the amount of elderly increases, the
Problem Statement
Week 1
Subject
Objectives
Users
State-of-the-art
For the use of care robots as exercise coach different kinds of research have been done. Different methods on how the robot should interact with people have been tested. For example the difference between relational and non-relational robot, where the relational one was preferred over the other [1]. Or that socially assistive robots positively affect motivation compared to smart environment interfaces such as touch screens [2]. But mostly research about the ethical consequences of the use of care robots for elderly people have been done [3]
But for how to check if the elders do their tasks, not a lot of studies have been done
Approach
Planning
Milestones
Deliverables
Who will do what
Problem statement + objectives - Tim
State of the art - Jules + Stijn
Users + What do they require - Jessie
Approach, milestones and deliverables + who does what - Ruben
References
- ↑ J. Fasola and M. J. Mataric, "Using Socially Assistive Human–Robot Interaction to Motivate Physical Exercise for Older Adults," in Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 100, no. 8, pp. 2512-2526, Aug. 2012. [1]
- ↑ Torta, Elena & Oberzaucher, Johannes & Werner, Franz & Cuijpers, Raymond & Juola, James. (2013). Attitudes Towards Socially Assistive Robots in Intelligent Homes: Results From Laboratory Studies and Field Trials. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction. 1. 76-99. [2]
- ↑ Bernd Carsten Stahl, Neil McBride, Kutoma Wakunuma, Catherine Flick, The empathic care robot: A prototype of responsible research and innovation, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Volume 84, 2014, Pages 74-85. [3]
Y. Matsusaka, H. Fujii, T. Okano and I. Hara, "Health exercise demonstration robot TAIZO and effects of using voice command in robot-human collaborative demonstration," RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Toyama, 2009, pp. 472-477. [4]