Embedded Motion Control 2017 Group 5 Meetings Overview: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 13:58, 30 May 2017

Reviewed initial concept design with tutor.

Team needs to think more on software architecture (components, functions, flows).

Current architecture diagrams are not explicit enough.

Agreed to meet next week to discuss findings and prepare first presentation.

Discussed initial design and prepared presentation.

Presentation will be made.

Information flows need to be specified.

Code the corridor challenge in pairs (Sjoerd & Bart, Rodrigo & Kagan, Angel & Torben).

Discussed corridor challenge progress.

Focus on framework, easier to discuss if we are more specific.

Think carefully on what we need/want to test (some parameters) Simulation vs Real.

Code the corridor challenge separately, in pairs Sjoerd & Bart (world model) , Rodrigo & Kagan (Motion Controller), Angel & Torben (Action Manager).

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 <li>Information flows need to be specified.
 <li>Code the corridor challenge in pairs (Sjoerd & Bart, Rodrigo & Kagan, Angel & Torben).
+== Meeting 3 (19-5-2017) ==
+Discussed corridor challenge progress.
+<li>Focus on framework, easier to discuss if we are more specific.
+<li>Think carefully on what we need/want to test (some parameters) Simulation vs Real.
+<li>Code the corridor challenge separately, in pairs Sjoerd & Bart (world model) , Rodrigo & Kagan (Motion Controller), Angel & Torben (Action Manager).