Running Files MSD16: Difference between revisions

From Control Systems Technology Group
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with '{{:Content_MSD16_small}} __NOTOC__')
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{:Content_MSD16_small}}
{{:Content_MSD16_small}}
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
= Risk Analysis =
== Line Referee: TURTLE vs Omnibot ==
The first idea was to use a TURTLE robot as a line referee while two Omnibots would be playing on the field. However, the communication with the TURTLE seems to be a difficult task which is not yet achieved. Also, there are only two Omnibots currently present to test with and we are not the only team who want to use them. Now a choice needs to be made whether it would be better to switch the role of the different robots: two TURTLEs as players and one Omnibot as a line referee. To make a decision about this, this risk analysis is made.
=== Choice 1: TURTLE as line-referee and Omnibots as players ===
pros:
* this was the first idea for the project
* the TURTLEs already possess algorithms to detect a ball and players
* the TURTLEs already are able to locate themselves
cons:
* the communication with the TURTLEs is still not working
* if the comm is working, we should still adapt the code to use our set-points
* in order to use comm we need at least one laptop with Ubuntu and run everything on there or link it to the base laptop
* the TURTLEs are quite big, maybe to big to drive next to the field
=== Choice 1: TURTLE as player and Omnibots as line-referee ===
pros:
* comm with Omnibot is already working (arrows to control the bots)
*

Revision as of 10:55, 7 March 2017

Internal Navigation


  1. Main
  2. Project
  3. System Architecture
  4. Implementation
  5. Conclusions & Recommendations
  6. Manuals


Risk Analysis

Line Referee: TURTLE vs Omnibot

The first idea was to use a TURTLE robot as a line referee while two Omnibots would be playing on the field. However, the communication with the TURTLE seems to be a difficult task which is not yet achieved. Also, there are only two Omnibots currently present to test with and we are not the only team who want to use them. Now a choice needs to be made whether it would be better to switch the role of the different robots: two TURTLEs as players and one Omnibot as a line referee. To make a decision about this, this risk analysis is made.

Choice 1: TURTLE as line-referee and Omnibots as players

pros:

  • this was the first idea for the project
  • the TURTLEs already possess algorithms to detect a ball and players
  • the TURTLEs already are able to locate themselves

cons:

  • the communication with the TURTLEs is still not working
  • if the comm is working, we should still adapt the code to use our set-points
  • in order to use comm we need at least one laptop with Ubuntu and run everything on there or link it to the base laptop
  • the TURTLEs are quite big, maybe to big to drive next to the field


Choice 1: TURTLE as player and Omnibots as line-referee

pros:

  • comm with Omnibot is already working (arrows to control the bots)