PRE2016 3 Groep12: Difference between revisions
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
==Weekly logbook== | ==Weekly logbook== | ||
'''Week 1''' | |||
Starting here, the project was introduced and we formed groups. To generate an innovative and feasible idea, we held several brainstorm sessions. Coming up with a realistic approach to cure a relevant problem using technology, we shifted from several perspectives. In the end, we formulated a topic of research that entailed both security issues and privacy legislation. The basic ideas were covered in a presentation, to be given in week 2. We tried to create slides that were concise and complete, without too much text and with use of visuals. | |||
'''Week 2''' | |||
The presentation was completed and we started on the Wiki page too. We figured that the regular update of the Wiki will contribute strongly to our progress. Besides, this logbook gives a good overview of our objectives and the aspects of the project that were already covered. | |||
On Thursday, the presentation of the chosen project challenge will be given. Feedback from the other students and the expert panel can be implemented. | |||
'''Week 3''' | |||
''Presentation of plan of execution for the chosen project challenge, including definition of tasks, deliverables, milestones, Gantt chart and resource allocation.'' | |||
'''Week 4''' | |||
''Weekly feedback session between individual groups and expert panel. Feedback is on both learning goals (technical content and process).'' | |||
'''Week 5''' | |||
''Weekly feedback session between individual groups and expert panel. Feedback is on both learning goals (technical content and process).'' | |||
'''Week 6''' | |||
''Weekly feedback session between individual groups and expert panel. Feedback is on both learning goals (technical content and process).'' | |||
'''Week 7''' | |||
''Weekly feedback session between individual groups and expert panel. Feedback is on both learning goals (technical content and process).'' | |||
'''Week 8''' | |||
''Final presentation and demonstration'' | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
Revision as of 10:44, 13 February 2017
Group members
- Bibi Huijgen - 0906203
- Jamiro Leander
- Jari de Kroon - 0888168
- Juan van der Heijden - 0898805
- Plamen Pasliev - 0890518
- Stan Roelofs - 0892914
Introduction
In the year 2015 over 500000 cases of burglary and theft were recorded in the Netherlands [1]. Our aim is to reduce these numbers through the application of surveillance / security drones in areas where criminal rates are high.
Objectives
Our main objective is to research what the effects on society will be when autonomous security drones are deployed.
Approach
- Research state of the art using books and articles
- Look into existing technologies and find out how we can use them for our purpose
- Interview citizens about their opinions of drones surveilling their neighbourhoods
USE aspects
Conclusion
Discussion
Weekly logbook
Week 1 Starting here, the project was introduced and we formed groups. To generate an innovative and feasible idea, we held several brainstorm sessions. Coming up with a realistic approach to cure a relevant problem using technology, we shifted from several perspectives. In the end, we formulated a topic of research that entailed both security issues and privacy legislation. The basic ideas were covered in a presentation, to be given in week 2. We tried to create slides that were concise and complete, without too much text and with use of visuals.
Week 2 The presentation was completed and we started on the Wiki page too. We figured that the regular update of the Wiki will contribute strongly to our progress. Besides, this logbook gives a good overview of our objectives and the aspects of the project that were already covered.
On Thursday, the presentation of the chosen project challenge will be given. Feedback from the other students and the expert panel can be implemented.
Week 3 Presentation of plan of execution for the chosen project challenge, including definition of tasks, deliverables, milestones, Gantt chart and resource allocation.
Week 4
Weekly feedback session between individual groups and expert panel. Feedback is on both learning goals (technical content and process).
Week 5 Weekly feedback session between individual groups and expert panel. Feedback is on both learning goals (technical content and process).
Week 6 Weekly feedback session between individual groups and expert panel. Feedback is on both learning goals (technical content and process).
Week 7 Weekly feedback session between individual groups and expert panel. Feedback is on both learning goals (technical content and process).
Week 8 Final presentation and demonstration