Related Literature Group 4, design: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div style="font-family: 'Calibri'; font-size: 15px; line-height: 1.5; max-width: 1100px; word-wrap: break-word; color: #333; font-weight: 400; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; padding: 50px; background-color: white; padding-top: 25px;"> | |||
<font size='6' style="margin-bottom: 20px; padding-bottom: 10px;display: block;"> Excerpts & citations </font> | |||
===Gender=== | ===Gender=== | ||
Revision as of 18:59, 9 May 2021
Excerpts & citations
Gender
- Females chose to gender-match and to interact with a more realistic VA. Males exhibited little preference for either gender, and a greater preference than females for realistic VAs. Thus, where it is not feasible to gender-match in SSCO, the recommendation is to implement a realistic female VA [1]
References
- ↑ Payne, J., Szymkowiak, A., Robertson, P., & Johnson, G. (2013). Gendering the machine: Preferred virtual assistant gender and realism in self-service. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 8108 LNAI, 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40415-3_9