PRE2020 4 Group3: Difference between revisions
TUe\20183207 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
TUe\20183207 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
====Eline Boom==== | ====Eline Boom==== | ||
{| class="wikitable" border= | {| class="wikitable" border=1 cellpadding=5 style="border-collapse: collapse;" | ||
|+ | |+ | ||
|- | |- |
Revision as of 21:37, 2 May 2021
Group members
Name | Student number |
---|---|
Eline Boom | 1465872 |
Luuk van Dorst | 1469789 |
Robin van de Hoef | 1479679 |
Kyra Moviat | 1349171 |
Jeroen Pullen | 1477730 |
Veerle Uhl | 1462229 |
Interactive software learning children how to draw, count and recognize colors. Children will get small tasks like "draw 3 red apples", the software will recognize the extent to which this task is done correctly and provide compliments and or suggested improvements.
Plan
Subjects: Child psychology, learning, image processing, software development.
Objectives: Create software to help children learn
Users: Children (of parents that want to provide a playful learning app)
State-of-the art: Alternative apps that help children either count, draw or learn colors individually. Not in a combined way, we feel the combination might improve the way to learn these things. Additionally, we hypothesize that explaining problems via a childs own drawn elements could improve their understanding.
Approach: Make up a model for how the software should work, make software in which one can draw, program software that can recognize multiple drawn objects/shapes, implement everything in a working framework according to the model.
Planning:
Investigate literature in week 2 & 3
Software model in week 2 & 3
Drawing software in week 3 & 4
Object recognition software in week 5 & 6
Implement recognition software in framework in week 7 & 8
Work on wiki and presentation during week 2-8
Milestones: Drawing software, Working object recognition, implementation in task framework
Deliverables: Peer review, Wiki, Final Presentation, The software (?)
Who will do what: yet to be determined
Time log
Eline Boom
Week | Tasks | Number of hours |
---|---|---|
1 | Example | Example |
2 | Example | Example |
3 | Example | Example |
4 | Example | Example |
5 | Example | Example |
6 | Example | Example |
7 | Example | Example |
8 | Example | Example |
Name, Total, Breakdown
Eline Boom
1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting
0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting
(...) ________________
Total:
Luuk van Dorst
1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting
0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting
(...) ________________
Total:
Kyra Moviat
1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting
0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting
(...) ________________
Total:
Robin van de Hoef
1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting
0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting
(...)
________________
Total:
Jeroen Pullen
1h, 21/04/21, Research project ideas
1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting
1h, 26/04/21, Prepare poject planning
1h, 27/04/21, Research state of the art
1h, 28/04/21, Updating Wiki
1h, 29/04/21, Contacting stakeholders
0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting
1h, 29/04/21, Preparing stakeholder questions
1.5h, 30/04/21, Interview first stakeholder
________________
Total: 9 hours
Veerle Uhl
1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting
0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting
(...) ________________
Total: