PRE2020 4 Group3: Difference between revisions
TUe\20183207 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
TUe\20183207 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{| class="wikitable" border=1 cellpadding=3 | {| class="wikitable" border=1 cellpadding=3 border-collapse | ||
|+ '''Group members''' | |+ '''Group members''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
Revision as of 21:08, 2 May 2021
| Name | Student number |
|---|---|
| Eline Boom | 1465872 |
| Luuk van Dorst | 1469789 |
| Robin van de Hoef | 1479679 |
| Kyra Moviat | 1349171 |
| Jeroen Pullen | 1477730 |
| Veerle Uhl | 1462229 |
Group members: Eline Boom 1465872, Luuk van Dorst 1469789, Robin van de Hoef 1479679, Kyra Moviat 1349171, Jeroen Pullen 1477730, Veerle Uhl 1462229 Interested in creating a software / theoretical solution.
Interactive software learning children how to draw, count and recognize colors. Children will get small tasks like "draw 3 red apples", the software will recognize the extent to which this task is done correctly and provide compliments and or suggested improvements.
Plan
Subjects: Child psychology, learning, image processing, software development.
Objectives: Create software to help children learn
Users: Children (of parents that want to provide a playful learning app)
State-of-the art: Alternative apps that help children either count, draw or learn colors individually. Not in a combined way, we feel the combination might improve the way to learn these things. Additionally, we hypothesize that explaining problems via a childs own drawn elements could improve their understanding.
Approach: Make up a model for how the software should work, make software in which one can draw, program software that can recognize multiple drawn objects/shapes, implement everything in a working framework according to the model.
Planning:
Investigate literature in week 2 & 3
Software model in week 2 & 3
Drawing software in week 3 & 4
Object recognition software in week 5 & 6
Implement recognition software in framework in week 7 & 8
Work on wiki and presentation during week 2-8
Milestones: Drawing software, Working object recognition, implementation in task framework
Deliverables: Peer review, Wiki, Final Presentation, The software (?)
Who will do what: yet to be determined
Journal
Name, Total, Breakdown
Eline Boom
1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting
0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting
(...) ________________
Total:
Luuk van Dorst
1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting
0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting
(...) ________________
Total:
Kyra Moviat
1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting
0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting
(...) ________________
Total:
Robin van de Hoef
1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting
0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting
(...)
________________
Total:
Jeroen Pullen
1h, 21/04/21, Research project ideas
1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting
1h, 26/04/21, Prepare poject planning
1h, 27/04/21, Research state of the art
1h, 28/04/21, Updating Wiki
1h, 29/04/21, Contacting stakeholders
0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting
1h, 29/04/21, Preparing stakeholder questions
1.5h, 30/04/21, Interview first stakeholder
________________
Total: 9 hours
Veerle Uhl
1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting
0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting
(...) ________________
Total: