PRE2020 3 Group2: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
-when is what done | -when is what done | ||
=== Week 1 === | === Week 1 === | ||
{| border=1 style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 80%; height: 14em;align-self: center;" | {| border=1 style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 80%; height: 14em;align-self: center;text-align:center;" | ||
! Name | ! Name | ||
! Total [h] | ! Total [h] | ||
| Line 106: | Line 106: | ||
|} | |} | ||
=== Week 2 === | === Week 2 === | ||
{| border=1 style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 80%; height: 14em;align-self: center;" | {| border=1 style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 80%; height: 14em;align-self: center;text-align:center;" | ||
! Name | ! Name | ||
! Total [h] | ! Total [h] | ||
| Line 132: | Line 132: | ||
|} | |} | ||
=== Week 3 === | === Week 3 === | ||
{| border=1 style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 80%; height: 14em;align-self: center;" | {| border=1 style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 80%; height: 14em;align-self: center;text-align:center;" | ||
! Name | ! Name | ||
! Total [h] | ! Total [h] | ||
Revision as of 12:35, 16 February 2021
Robot Desk Companion
Group Members
| Name | Student ID | Department | Email address |
|---|---|---|---|
| Okke Rikmenspoel | o.m.rikmenspoel@student.tue.nl | ||
| Christian Janssen | c.h.f.janssen@student.tue.nl | ||
| Richard van Loon | r.p.a.v.loon@student.tue.nl | ||
| Ahmad Alsarakbi | 1285874 | Computer Science and Engineering | a.alsarakbi@student.tue.nl |
| Isabel Kuipers | 1297325 | i.e.kuipers@student.tue.nl |
Problem statement
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic (which started in?), students had to work from home for longer periods of time. Different type of health problems occurred due to the work-from-home situation (source). Students sit in front of their screen for many hours, neglecting their health by not taking breaks or taking care of themselves. Concentration is heavily impacted as well, a phone is almost always in sight and nobody is telling them not to use it.
Students do not need a nanny bot, however, a robot which guides them in the right direction would be very beneficial (sources). This robot will be placed on the desk where the student works. The robot should not be too distracting (1). It should give friendly health-related reminders (2). And It should guide and motivate studying (3).
Objectives
- Not be too distracting.
- Support health during studying .
- Guide studying.
USE Analysis
- Users
- Society
- Enterprise
- user persona/scenario
State-of-the-art
All of our research discussed min 25 papers
Isabel Human and robot interaction + already existing designs
Persuasive technologies
Planning
Approach and milestones
- how will we solve the problem?
- milestones per week
Week 1 Define functions needed Research functions and design aspects Week 2 Questionnaire for user input Sketch proposed design Week 3 Analyse questionnaire Sketch detailed design Create base simulation robot Week 4 Finalize simulation Start prototyping Week 5
Week 6 Finish prototype Week 7 Final video
Week 8 Final wiki
Planning table
-who does what in which week etc
-when is what done
Week 1
| Name | Total [h] | Break-down |
|---|---|---|
| Okke Rikmenspoel | ||
| Christian Janssen | ||
| Richard van Loon | ||
| Ahmad Alsarakbi | 5 | Meetings (3h), Research(2h) |
| Isabel Kuipers |
Week 2
| Name | Total [h] | Break-down |
|---|---|---|
| Okke Rikmenspoel | ||
| Christian Janssen | ||
| Richard van Loon | ||
| Ahmad Alsarakbi | 6 | Meetings (4h), Research(1h), Questionnaire(1h) |
| Isabel Kuipers | 7 | Research(1,5h), Questionnaire (2,5h), Sketch (1h), Wiki (2h). Meetings (4h) |
Week 3
| Name | Total [h] | Break-down |
|---|---|---|
| Okke Rikmenspoel | ||
| Christian Janssen | ||
| Richard van Loon | ||
| Ahmad Alsarakbi | ||
| Isabel Kuipers |
Deliverables
- wiki page
- simulated robot
- prototype (if possible)
- presentation
After the plan
- Researched functions chosen
- Questionnaire + results
- Design sketch + all the aspects explained
- Simulation explained
- Prototype shown and explained