PRE2020 1 Group1: Difference between revisions
Line 772: | Line 772: | ||
In order to decrease COVID-19 spread it is very important that people are careful themselves. At the time of writing the article in September 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has been in the Netherlands for about half a year. In the period of June 17th to June 30th, Eindhoven had 9 infected people according to the RIVM<ref name="RIVMcijfers">Actuele informatie over het nieuwe coronavirus (COVID-19). (2020). RIVM. https://www.rivm.nl/coronavirus-covid-19/actueel</ref>, and since then the number started exponentialy increasing to 117 infections in the period form August 26th to September 8th. Because the number of infections in Eindhoven and its regions has been relatively low for some time, the perceived risk of COVID-19 has gone down a lot. This results in people being less careful. In order to make people more aware and careful, visibility is very important. Visibility can be manifested in different ways. People you know being infected is an example of visibility. Other, more preferable examples are medi and visible coronameasures. A visible center of coronadetection of course falls under the last category. Several steps can be taken to manipulate people in being more careful by improving the design of the center and the surroundings. | In order to decrease COVID-19 spread it is very important that people are careful themselves. At the time of writing the article in September 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has been in the Netherlands for about half a year. In the period of June 17th to June 30th, Eindhoven had 9 infected people according to the RIVM<ref name="RIVMcijfers">Actuele informatie over het nieuwe coronavirus (COVID-19). (2020). RIVM. https://www.rivm.nl/coronavirus-covid-19/actueel</ref>, and since then the number started exponentialy increasing to 117 infections in the period form August 26th to September 8th. Because the number of infections in Eindhoven and its regions has been relatively low for some time, the perceived risk of COVID-19 has gone down a lot. This results in people being less careful. In order to make people more aware and careful, visibility is very important. Visibility can be manifested in different ways. People you know being infected is an example of visibility. Other, more preferable examples are medi and visible coronameasures. A visible center of coronadetection of course falls under the last category. Several steps can be taken to manipulate people in being more careful by improving the design of the center and the surroundings. | ||
People are different, and this has to be taken into account in the persuasion process. There are, on one hand, high-self-monitoring individuals, who mostly serve a social-adjustive function, and on the other hand low-self-monitoring individuals, who serve a value-expressive function. The high-self-monitoring group is more easily persuaded by messages that focus on facilitating social interaction and enhancing cohesion, and the low-self-monitoring group is more easily persuaded by messages that focus on core values or beliefs.<ref name="Persuasionapl"> DeBono, K. G. (1987). Investigating the social-adjustive and value-expressive functions of attitudes: Implications for persuasion processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(2), 279–287. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.2.279</ref> This can be implemented in the design process by making posters for example, where one type of poster is designed to target the high-self-monitoring group, and another type of poster is designed to target the low-self-monitoring group. For the high-self-monitoring group this poster should focus on the social groups the people could be in, and | People are different, and this has to be taken into account in the persuasion process. There are, on one hand, high-self-monitoring individuals, who mostly serve a social-adjustive function, and on the other hand low-self-monitoring individuals, who serve a value-expressive function. The high-self-monitoring group is more easily persuaded by messages that focus on facilitating social interaction and enhancing cohesion, and the low-self-monitoring group is more easily persuaded by messages that focus on core values or beliefs.<ref name="Persuasionapl"> DeBono, K. G. (1987). Investigating the social-adjustive and value-expressive functions of attitudes: Implications for persuasion processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(2), 279–287. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.2.279</ref> This can be implemented in the design process by making posters for example, where one type of poster is designed to target the high-self-monitoring group, and another type of poster is designed to target the low-self-monitoring group. For the high-self-monitoring group this poster should focus on the social groups the people could be in, and imply that not adhering to the rules lowers your cohesion with the group. For the low-self-monitoring group the focus should lie on complying to the rules because of valueing for example life, health, decency and common sense. | ||
People behave differently when they are self-aware and non-self-aware.<ref name="Selfaware"> Gibbons, F. X. (1990). The impact of focus of attention and affect on social behaviour. Shyness and embarrassment: Perspectives from social psychology, 119-143.</ref> If people are self-aware they are more likely to act according to the way they perceive themselves or how they think they should behave, which is mostly better behaviour. The presence of a mirror or an audience can greatly improve self-awareness. <ref name="mirroraudience">Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1978). Self-focusing effects of dispositional self-consciousness, mirror presence, and audience presence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(3), 324–332. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.3.324.</ref> In case of the center for symptom detection, self-awareness of surrounding people can be increased by the presence of reflective surfaces such as mirrors and the presence of for example law enforcing people looking around. | People behave differently when they are self-aware and non-self-aware.<ref name="Selfaware"> Gibbons, F. X. (1990). The impact of focus of attention and affect on social behaviour. Shyness and embarrassment: Perspectives from social psychology, 119-143.</ref> If people are self-aware they are more likely to act according to the way they perceive themselves or how they think they should behave, which is mostly better behaviour. The presence of a mirror or an audience can greatly improve self-awareness. <ref name="mirroraudience">Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1978). Self-focusing effects of dispositional self-consciousness, mirror presence, and audience presence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(3), 324–332. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.3.324.</ref> In case of the center for symptom detection, self-awareness of surrounding people can be increased by the presence of reflective surfaces such as mirrors and the presence of for example law enforcing people looking around. |
Revision as of 09:10, 12 September 2020
Group members
Name | Student ID | Department |
---|---|---|
Davide Fabbro | 1255401 | Electrical Engineering |
Lieke Nijhuis | 0943276 | Innovation Sciences |
Ikira Wortel | 1334336 | Electrical Engineering |
Wout Opdam | 1241084 | Mechanical Engineering |
Problem statement and objectives
COVID-19 is a disease that as of 5 september 2020 has 26.171.112 confirmed cases and 865.154 confirmed deaths worldwide. This pandemic has caused many countries to go into lockdown, and strict measurements are being taken to lessen the spread of the disease. The virus easily spreads itself in crowds, and this is where the idea of a center for a COVID-19 symptom detection system in choke points and crowded places was born. In this study we will focus on the Heuvel Galerie Eindhoven in particular.
The objectives of this center are:
- Detection of COVID-19 symptoms in a crowd
- Suggesting screened people to take a conventional test (swab test) and possibly denying them access
- Applying a form of social control in order to make people follow the rules better
- Creating a general feeling of awareness and safety
The project
This project is part of the course 0LAUK0 Robots Everywhere. The project concerns a COVID-19 symptom detection system for choke points and crowded places.
Approach
A literature study will be performed on the feasability of a COVID-19 symptom detection system for choke points and crowded places. This literature study will include an investigation of possible privacy issues that can arise when such a system is deployed in public places.
A design for the hardware of the system will be made and a pseudocode will be written for the software behind the system. The system will be designed as to avoid the possible identified privacy issues.
Also, a cost-benefit analysis will be performed to get a view on the financial feasibility of the system.
Deliverables
The deliverables for this project include:
- Literature/feasability study of a COVID-19 symptom detection system for choke points and crowded places, including a privacy-issue study.
- Design of the hardware of the system.
- Pseudocode of the software of the system.
- Cost-benefit analysis.
- A wiki page.
- A presentation video.
Planning and milestones
In the figure below, the project planning is given. The left most column contains the milestones for the project. The column to the right of the first column contains all tasks that need to be completed in order to achieve that milestone.
Here, an overview will be given of the tasks that need to be completed per week (corresponding to the figure above), and who is responsible for them:
Week 1
Task | Person | Completed |
---|---|---|
Brainstorm about subject | Everyone | Yes |
Create layout for wiki page | Wout | Yes |
Make planning for project | Wout | Yes |
Write problem statement and objectives | Lieke | Yes |
Describe users | Ikira | Yes |
Describe user needs | Wout | Yes |
Read and summarize articles for State of the Art | Everyone | Yes |
Write State of the Art | Davide | Yes |
Week 2
Task | Person | Completed |
---|---|---|
Describe psychological effect of visible detection system | Lieke | Yes |
Create layout for entire wiki page | Wout | Yes |
Update planning of project | Wout | Yes |
Redefine USE'ers | Ikira | |
Redefine USE'ers needs | Wout | Yes |
Describe possible use case (Heuvel Galerie) | Wout | Yes |
Research possible privacy issues and describe on wiki | Ikira | |
Describe what happens after test (deny acces?, regulations?) | Lieke | Yes |
Describe different detection options, what we chose and why, why no 1.5m detection | Davide, Lieke | |
Re-write (in wiki) project focuss only covid symptoms | Davide | Yes |
Read/investigate similar systems and describe on wiki | Davide |
Week 3
Task | Person | Completed |
---|---|---|
Formulate RPC's | Everyone | |
Make sketches of detection system | Wout | |
Make sketches of measurement station | Wout | |
Discuss required software functionalities | Everyone | |
Write pseudocode for detection system | Ikira | |
Checkpoint description (research conventional checkpoints) and sensors placement | Davide | |
Research possible privacy issues and describe on wiki | Ikira | |
Describe psychological effect of visible detection system | Lieke |
Week 4
Task | Person | Completed |
---|---|---|
Sensors placement and type of microphone | Davide | |
Perform cost-benefit analysis and describe on wiki | Lieke | |
Discuss and finalize sketches | Everyone, Wout | |
Make CAD design of detection system | Wout | |
Make CAD design of measurement station | Wout | |
Write pseudocode for notifying medical staff of person with symptoms | Ikira |
Week 5
Task | Person | Completed |
---|---|---|
Perform cost-benefit analysis and describe on wiki | Lieke | |
Conclude on feasability and describe on wiki | Ikira | |
Make CAD design of detection system | Wout | |
Make CAD design of measurement station | Wout | |
Write pseudocode for measurement station | Ikira |
Week 6
Task | Person | Completed |
---|---|---|
Conclude on feasability and describe on wiki | Ikira | |
Describe CAD designs on wiki | Wout | |
Put pseudocodes on wiki with description and user interface screenshot examples | Ikira | |
Discuss what should be in video | Everyone | |
Make a script for video | Lieke | |
Make slides and visuals for video | Lieke | |
Write conclusion | Davide | |
Write discussion | ||
Write recommendation | ||
Check wiki completeness (titel, introduction etc.) | Everyone |
Week 7
Task | Person | Completed |
---|---|---|
Record video | Lieke | |
Describe peer review | Ikira | |
Finalize layout of wiki | Everyone | |
Final check: spelling, citation style etc. | Everyone |
Week 8
Task | Person | Completed |
---|---|---|
Hand everything in | Everyone |
Users
In this section the use case for the detection system will be given and the users and their needs are identified.
Use case: Heuvel Galerie
In the projected use case for the COVID-19 symptom detection system, the system is deployed at the Heuvel Galerie (official new name: Heuvel Eindhoven). The Heuvel Galerie is a big indoor shoppingcenter located in the center of Eindhoven.
The Heuvel Galerie has three floors, four entrances and it's own underground parking facility. The Heuvel Galerie is a big shoppingcenter: it has over 80 stores and houses the Muziekgebouw Eindhoven and a Holland Casino. Because it houses many stores and facilities, it draws a significant number of visitors. In 2001 the Heuvel Galerie got an average of 200.000 weekly visitors [2]. Because of the corona situation, the shoppingcenter has taken measurements like putting up hand-disinfection stations and creating walking routes. This enables the shoppingcenter to remain open and draw visitors. The following table (in Dutch) shows a recent (as of 7-9-2020) timetable with the relative amount of visitors. It can be seen that despite the COVID-19 situation, there are still time-slots in the weekend which can be defined as 'busy'.
Due to the high amount of visitors, and the fact that the Heuvel Galerie is a closed, indoor facility with clearly defined entrances it could be a potential safety hazard. On busy days these entrances can become choke points and the hallways can become crowded.
The Heuvel Galerie could benefit from a system of the type which is developed in this project. Due to the five entrances (four street-level entrances and the parking lot entrance), the flow of people entering and leaving can be precisely monitored. The COVID-19 symptom detection system will be placed at all entrances. This way, the entire flow of people entering the Heuvel Galerie will be checked for COVID-19 symptoms. If a person is identified with possible COVID-19 symptoms, they can for example be asked to not acces the Heuvel Galerie and do a real test at a GGD testing location or be denied acces completely. This will create a more safe and pleasant shopping experience for the shoppers and a more safe working environment for the owners and personnel of the shops and restaurants.
Who are the users
User
The users of the robot are the people going in to the Heuvel Galerie, the medical staff that check for COVID-19 symptoms, the shop employees and the law enforcement.
The people going in to the Heuvel Galerie will be checked to see if they are coughing, if they are not, then there is no problem. However if they are coughing they could then be picked out by the medical staff and get a closer checkup. When the people are checked and it is seen that they do not have Covid-19 they would be allowed to enter. If they however do test positive, the law enforcement could keep these people out and with this prevent them from spreading the virus inside. For the shop-employees this is also very important since they come into contact with a lot of people. So having people screened at the entrance will lower the chance of them becoming sick and then also spreading it further.
Society
The main stakeholders for the society would be the government, the uninfected and infected people going into the Heuvel Galerie and the shop employees.
The local government is a stakeholder since they could spend money to place the device and are responsible for the local regulations around COVID-19.
The infected people are a stakeholder since they can be informed about having COVID-19. Which could change their behavior and limit the spread of COVID-19.
The uninfected people are a stakeholder since when there is a detection device for COVID-19 less people inside will be walking around infected with COVID-19, which results in a lower spread. For this reason the shop employees are also a stakeholder here, their working environment becomes a lot safer.
Enterprise
Since the robot should be developed the stakeholder would be the companies developing the product. The shops are also effected by placing the device at the entrance of the Heuvel Galerie, since this might prevent potential customers from not being able to enter. On the other hand, this policy could also create potential customers for the shop since people might feel more safe shopping there compared to other places.
What are the users needs
Here the needs of the above identified users regarding the COVID-19 symptom detection system will be given.
User
Shopping people
The requirements for uninfected shoppers are:
- Hindrance: Shoppers come to the Heuvel Galerie to have a fun day. The system should not cause excessive hindrance.
- Proper detection: Proper detection ensures possible COVID-19 carriers are identified so that others may shop in safety.
- Privacy: The system must comply with all privacy regulations.
The requirements for infected shoppers are:
- Proper detection: The system should minimize the number of false positives and false negatives. People with good intentions that are unaware they carry the virus should be notified.
- Privacy: The system must be discrete since it can be embarrassing for people to be picked out for a COVID-19 test and it can cause unnecessary panic at the location. The privacy of the people being tested should be guaranteed such that for example bystanders cannot obtain the identity of the person being tested.
Shop owners
The requirements for the shop owners are:
- Proper detection: Shop personnel will come into contact with a lot of different people while doing their work. Proper detection will benefit the safety of the personnel, for which the shop owner is responsible.
Medical staff
The requirements for the medical staff are:
- Ease of use: The system must be easy to use for the medical personnel. No special extra training should be required, a user manual should provide enough information to operate the system.
- Safe to use: While operating the system and working with people that possibly carry the virus, the medical personnel should not be exposed to too much risk of catching the virus themselves.
Law enforcement
The requirements for the law enforcement are:
- Proper detection: A proper detection ensures a safer work environment for the security guards of the Heuvel Galerie.
- Hindrance: The system should not be cause of any dangerous- or other unwanted situations requiring the security guard’s attention and thus creating more work for them.
Society
Local government
The requirements for the local government are:
- Increasing attractiveness: The system should create a safe shopping environment, making it more attractive for people from outside Eindhoven to go to Eindhoven and shop at the Heuvel Galerie, and possibly other stores/restaurants in the city.
Shopping people
The requirements for the shopping people as seen from a society standpoint are the same as seen from a user standpoint, except that when seen from the society standpoint, the requirement of proper detection becomes extra important because this will create safer shopping environments in general and could help reduce the number of infected people.
Shop owners
The requirements for shop owners as seen from a society standpoint are the same as seen from a user standpoint, except now again the proper detection requirement is extra important because this can lead to a healthier population in general meaning more potential customers.
Enterprise
Shop owners
The requirement for shop owners from an enterprise standpoint are:
- Hindrance: The system should not cause excessive hindrance, resulting in less potential customers visiting the Heuvel Galerie.
- Increasing attractiveness: The system should make it more attractive to visit the location compared to the situation in which the system was not in place or compared to other shopping locations in Eindhoven were no such system is installed.
Company developing the product
The requirements for the company developing the product are:
- Attractive product: The product has to be attractively priced in order to sell more units and make a profit. Therefore, it should not be too expensive to manufacture. It also needs to have decent looks to make it marketable.
- Comply with regulations: The manufacturer does not want to get into trouble for selling this product. It must comply with all regulations.
As can be seen, for multiple stakeholders it is important that the product complies with regulations (health, privacy etc.) and that the system properly detects people with COVID-19 symptoms. This is one of the most important requirements. The above-mentioned user requirements will be converted to more concrete requirements for the design of the system in the RPC’s.
State of the art
Here, the State of the Art is given. It is divided into several topics. Each topic starts with a small summary of the State of the Art and after that the summarized articles concerning that topic are given.
Screening System for detecting COVID-19 symptoms and safety rules compliance
To verify the feasibility of an automatic system which screens subjects for COVID-19 virus using cough sounds some research needed to be done. Several research topics have been investigated such as: COVID-19 detection trough cough sound, conventional techniques to diagnose COVID-19, thermal imagery for mass fever screening and infrared technology for temperature sensing in humans.
An alternative method to screen subjects for COVID-19 would be through cough samples. Currently, research is being done by a couple of groups in the UK and USA. Resulting high accuracy of the algorithm has encouraged a mass collection of cough samples, even through the use of mobile APPs.
General guidelines and techniques to diagnose the COVID-19 virus. Some of the discussed techniques for diagnosis are molecular tests (PCR and serologic test), CT scans and emerging protein tests.
Several articles discussing the efficacy of infrared skin thermometers and infrared imaging in COVID-19 screening are presented. The conclusion is that handheld infrared thermometers have a low sensitivity and should not be used as a screening system. While discussions arise when assessing the usefulness of mass fever screening using thermal imaging. Many factors need to be taken into account such as: camera resolution, ambient temperature, distance from the camera and even marketing.
Articles
AI4COVID-19: AI enabled preliminary diagnosis for COVID-19 from cough samples via an app. (A. Imran, et al. 2020). Summarized by Ikira.[4]
This paper discusses an alternate way of testing for covid-19, since the current testing:
- Requires people to move through public places which could spread the virus
- Puts medical staff at risk for the personal
- Costs a lot
- Not everyone goes to a medical facility to get tested
The solution they came up with is to make an smartphone app that does a preliminary test based on your cough to see if you have covid-19 or not.
The reason for choosing this method is because:
- Prior studies have shown different respiratory syndromes have distinct features
- Coughing is the way the virus is mostly spread.
- There are less medical conditions that cause cough than fever
The steps taken for the making of the smartphone app are to first test if covid-19 has specific coughing characteristics (Results show there are). Second to train an engine that can distinguish a cough from background noise. third to train an engine that can distinguish between the different types of coughs and fourth to check the feasibility of the app. The accuracy of the proposed app is encouraging enough to support large scale testing.
Exploring Automatic Diagnosis of COVID-19from Crowdsourced Respiratory Sound Data (C. Brown, et al. 2020).[5]
Very similar research project as [4], but conducted by the University of Cambridge. Their research also tries to detect COVID-19 trough cough noises and respiration. Their research differs on two aspects. First, this study only uses crowdsourced audio recordings, while [4] uses data recorded in controlled environments. Secondly, this study uses simple machine learning (SVM) while [4] use a end-to-end deep learning model, which often overfit results when small samples are used.
Semantics and types of cough. (K. F. Chung, et al., 2009) [6]
Semantics of cough was very confusing and unorganized since also classification of cough type was dependent from methods used and form clinic-to-clinic.
Definition of cough
• First definition: Three-phase expulsive motor act:
- Inspiratory effort (inspiratory phase)
- Forced expiratory effort (compressive phase)
- Rapid airflow (expulsive phase)
• Forced expiratory manoeuvre against a closed glottis producing a sound
Types of cough
Coughs identified by their cause (e.g. asthma, reflux). Coughs are defined by their characteristics (e.g. wet, moist, chesty). Coughs can be acute (i.e. <3 weeks), subacute (i.e. 3-8 weeks) or chronic (i.e. >8 weeks). Coughs can occur in isolated episodes or in epochs. See Table 1.
Clinical analysis of coughs
Only quantitative data available is cough count. Coughs can be counted using automated audiovisual recordings. Automated cough counting does not distinguish between isolated and epoch coughs. More sophisticated analysis which measure pressure, airflows and abdominal muscle electromyograms can give a quantitative intensity of the cough. But this analysis is better suited for a research clinic instead of an investigative clinic.
Estimated effectiveness of symptom and risk screening to prevent the spread of COVID-19 By (K. M. Gostic, et al. 2020). Summarized by Lieke.[7] This article uses a mathematical model about the spread of emerging pathogens from 2015 combined with the current knowledge about the epidemiological parameters of the COVID-19 spread to estimate the extent in which traveler screening will be useful. Because COVID-19 has a long incubation period many cases are fundamentally undetectable, which will lead to screening missing more than half of the infected people. This number might increase a bit when the epidemic is stable instead of growing, because the times since exposure will be more evenly distributed.
Real-time tracking of self-reported symptoms to predict potential COVID-19 (C. Menni, et al. 2020). Summarized by Lieke.[8]
Symptoms and indicators of COVID-19 include loss of taste and smell, anosmia, fatigue, persistent cough and loss of appetite.
Asymptomatic Transmission, the Achilles’ Heel of Current Strategies to Control Covid-19 (M. Gandhi, et al. 2020). Summarized by Lieke.[9] Infection control relies heavily on early detection, but because COVID-19 has a long incubation time this does not work. This is why it is important to continuously test especially nurses on COVID-19, because it can be detected before the symptoms start to manifest.
Crowds by Example (A. Lerner, Y. Chrysanthou, D. Lischinski, 2007). Summarized by Lieke.[10]
Crowds can be modeled in several different ways, and in this study the people are tracked using video input, and modeled from that. Afterwards, the pedestrians were asked what influenced their path and to what extent. Using this information a model can be made. The influence factors are, to name a few, the topography of the terrain, the presence of obstacles, proximity to other people, the pedestrian’s personality and state of mind. Setting up some equations based on the experiment a model can be made that is able to simulate a crowd.
Diagnosing COVID-19: The disease and tools for detection (B. Udugama, et al. 2020). Summarized by Lieke.[11] To detect COVID-19 in the hospital there are several tests that can be used. Molecular tests are useful because they can target and identify specific pathogens, although nucleic acid testing is the primary way of testing for COVID-19. CT scans can be used but have a lower specificity because the imaging features overlap with other viral pneumonia. Emerging diagnostic tests for COVID-19 are protein tests, more developed nucleic acid tests and detection at the point-of-care, such as lateral flow antigen detection and microfluidic devices.
Detecting the Coronavirus (COVID-19) (P. Pokhrel, et al. 2020). Summarized by Ikira. [12] In December 2019 a new virus was discovered, the SARS-CoV-2. This virus causes the disease COVID-19 which has a medium reproduction rate(2.25%) and a medium mortality rate (5.7%). However contrary to the looks of only being a mild virus, when it remained untreated the sick people began to overwhelm the healthcare system which spread panic. SARS has a lot of similarities with COVID-19 and was eradicated in 2003 by syndromic surveillance, isolation of patients and not physical contact. If this will also work for COVID-19 will remain to be seen.
The characteristics of COVID-19 appear 3-7 days after infection and include fever, coughing and body weakness. People of old age or with underlaying illnesses have a higher mortality rate. People of ages are susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 which transmits via contact or bodily fluids.
One of the most important ways to limit the spread is by early detection so precautions can be taken. The current ways of detection COVID-19 are via a CT-scan, Nucleic Acid based methods and Immunoassays.
CT-scans contain specific characteristics of COVID-19 which helps to identify if the person has COVID-19, however these characteristics may overlap with other infections and give false positives. The test is more accurate if the test is executed during specific stages.
Nucleic Acid based method is a way of detection of RNA viruses in a clinical setting. Based on this method the CDC developed a real time RT-PCR diagnostic unit. Although this method is less sensitive than the CT imaging at certain stages, it specificity is much better making it a better detection method.
Immunoassay detects viral protein antigens or serum antibodies of people exposed to SARS-CoV-2, this method can detect the antibodies 3 days after infection it however also ha a lot of drawbacks.
The now emerging detection techniques are isothermal amplification for nucleic acid targets and lateral flow based detection of nucleic acids an proteins.
Comparison of Non-Contact Infrared Skin Thermometers (T. Fletcher, et al. 2018). Summarized by Ikira.[13]
Non-contact infrared skin thermometers are being used more as a means to asses body core temperature and signs of diabetic foot ulcerations In the paper 3 different thermometers were tested. All the manufacturers claimed less than 0.3 °C in the 22-40 °C range.
For infrared measuring devices there are changes in the measured temperature depending on the size of the target. This is also called the size-of-the source effect. Something else that influences the measurements is the difference in distance or the target from the measuring device. This is important since for these measuring devices there is no way to have the exact same distance each time and is thus included in testing these devices.
The results of this paper show that the tested measurement equipment did not come close to the before specified 0.3 °C and could reach up to 6 °C. The paper furthermore showed that the size-of-source effect and the distance matter a lot in the accuracy of the measurement device.
Comparison of Infrared Thermal Detection Systems for mass fever screening in a tropical healthcare setting (M. R. Tay, et al. 2015). Summarized by Ikira. [14]
Fever screening detection systems such as infrared thermal detection systems (ITDS) have been used before for rapid identification of potential cases of infected people. ITDS use the difference in the ambient temperature and the temperature of the subject.
Three different ITDS were used in Singapore to check if people had a fever. For these people an oral check was taken as a reference. In the paper sensitivity is described as people that have a fever are also detected as having a fever and specificity is described as people without a fever are also not seen as having a fever. Of the three tested ITDS they all had high specificity , 2 showed low to medium sensitivity while one showed high sensitivity. The ones that showed the lower sensitivity were older models while the newest model showed the higher sensitivity.
Crowd temp screening is a joke, says one expert (K. Field, 2020)[15]
Accuracy of the thermal camera depends on several factors (including human variability) and in ideal conditions the maximum accuracy is of ±2 deg C. (which to detect feverish patients is not enough).
The human body is a living and closed loop system it will fluctuate its temperature on various conditions (i.e. ambient temperature, energy expended, and alcohol consumption).
According to FDA guidelines the ideal part of the face to detect accurate temperature would be the inner canthus (tear duct). To measure the temperature of such a small area needs at least 3 x 3 pixels (5 x 5 for better results). Therefore to film such a small detail in a crowd environment a thermal camera should have a resolution of at least a million of pixels (around 12 mega pixels) which do not yet exist.
"Are you just deploying this gear for ‘feel good’ needs, or are you truly looking to measure and eliminate feverish people?"
"I could deploy a doctor that says he can tell your temperature is not normal by looking at your nose--and that might be just as accurate"
The expert's opinion: If you can’t do it right--don’t bother.
Remote monitoring of breathing dynamics using infrared thermography (C. B. Pereira, et al., 2015) [16]
Technique using thermal imaging in combination with a robust algorithm to detect breathing and to measure breathing rate (BR). The algorithm is a able to compensate for the movement of the subject.
The system shows accurate estimations of the breathing rate even under non ideal conditions (i.e. movement of the subject). For accurate measurements, the ambient temperature must be controlled. For further improvement of breath detection movement of the shoulders should be included in the algorithm.
Privacy Issues with Smart Technologies
Some research on privacy issues was done as a possible alternative idea. Nevertheless, privacy issues do tie quite strongly to the current subject. Since people are being recorded both on video and audio the question arises, what is done with the data? A more in depth research on ethical issues could be conducted. Some of the article discuss ethical use of surveillance technology, cyber security smart camera networks and in smart homes.
Articles
A Systematic Approach Towards User-Centric Privacy and Security for Smart Camera Networks (T. Winkler, et al. 2010). Summarized by Ikira.[17]
Fully digitized systems analyze video footage and sets of an alarm if there is suspicious activity. There a however still issues of privacy for this. Since the footage is stored, people can retrieve it and study the behavior of people. The current solutions for this are to blur out faces or to extract encrypt sensitive image regions.
Desirable properties of a secure an privacy-preserving camera system would be:
- Detection of sensitive regions
- Blanking
- Obfuscation and scrambling
- Abstraction
- Encryption
- Multiple privacy levels
For user acceptance it is important that the user gives consent to being filmed and can control it when they are being filmed by for instance placing signboard that the area is being filmed. Furthermore it is also important that the users can give feedback.
The paper sketches concept of a level approach for trustworthy smart camera’s. As a basis for the camera there will be hardware security around a microchip called the trusted platform module. To support the different privacy levels, motion detection is used. The lowest level of security is where only a background is visible while the person and their immediate surroundings are cut out by a black box. The next level would is done with edge detection, here only the person himself is visible and nothing of the surroundings. This is followed by the last level where the person and their immediate surroundings is visible. In other words only the black box that was cut out for the lowest level is visible.
A Smart Home is No Castle: Privacy Vulnerabilities of Encrypted IoT Traffic (N. Apthorpe, et al. 2017). Summarized by Ikira.[18]
Smart Home devices collect data not only when you are on the internet, but also about your daily life. There is a privacy concern if a passive network observer deduce behavior in the change in internet traffic. Some people say that due to encryption no sensitive information can be seen, however it can be argued that meta data and traffic patterns can reveal sensitive information. In this paper a strategy to recognize user behavior with traffic load of internet of things devices is given. Four Smart home devices are used for this. From all of these devices a network observer could infer behavioral patterns from observing the traffic load. Thus it would be necessary for devices to mask the true rate of devices. For the research in this paper a few assumptions were made. First of it is assumed there is only a passive network threat. Second packet contents are not used and finally it is assumed that the observer can obtain and study those devices. The way to analyze these traffic rates is to first separate traffic into sperate packet streams, then to find which stream belongs to which device. With this the traffic rates can be examined and the behavior of the consumer can be deduced.
All Eyes on You! Impact of Location, Camera Type, and Privacy-Security-Trade-off on the Acceptance of Surveillance Technologies. Summarize by Ikira.[19]
Crime surveillance technologies(CST) have increased in the past years. Critics fear that the recording and storing if the data will invade the privacy of the people. The acceptance of the people for these CST are important. This paper discusses the acceptance of the people towards different types and locations of the CST, at which turning points acceptation becomes rejection, the trade of between safety and privacy. To research this questionnaires were taken.
The results show that people find the locations of the CST the most important followed by the crime reduction, handling of the recorded data and last the camera types. The paper further shows based on the before named subjects the how much people accept it the CST. The most rejected was surveillance in your own home. To research the trade of between security and privacy 3 scenarios were made, 1 with high security low privacy, 1 with average security and average privacy and 1 with low security and high privacy. The high security came out the best of these scenarios.
Autonomous robots against COVID-19
A prime example of a (USE) robotic technology in use to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. This article describes the successful employment of a robot using UV lamps to disinfect hospital rooms.
Autonomous Robots Are Helping Kill Coronavirus in Hospitals (E. Ackerman, 2020). Summarized by Lieke.[20]
UVD Robots is making robots that are mobile arrays of powerful UVC lights that kill microorganisms. UV lights on carts are used to disinfect areas for some time, but they are dangerous for human skin and when they are operated by humans it is prone to human error and it might skip a few places. This newly developed product is able to autonomously disinfect a room between 10 and 15 minutes, with the robot spending 1 or 2 minutes in five or six different positions to maximize the surface it disinfects.
General robotic technologies in the medical field
Since at the beginning of the project the topic was unclear some research was done on general technologies used now and applicable in the near future.
Articles
Can robots handle your healthcare? (N. Davies, 2016). Summarized by Wout.[21]
The demand for healthcare robots will rise due to an ageing population and a shortage of carers. Japan is a leading country in the field of healthcare robots. They develop their robots in close coordination with elderly and patients.
Safety is an important aspect for healthcare robots. They must be absolutely fool proof. In order to safely operate around humans, robots need to feature things like quick reflexes, communication capabilities and interaction capabilities via video and audio. This translates into a wide range of sensors, cameras and actuators the robot needs to have. Next to a robot’s features, their looks are also important. Robots that try to impersonate actual humans, but still show imperfections, can make users uneasy.
An area in which robots can do a better job than humans is being consistent in the quality of the care that is provided. After a long difficult shift, humans can be prone to errors while robots are not affected by exhaustion or other emotions.
For simple routine healthcare tasks, robots can be a good solution.
How medical robots will change healthcare (P. B. Nichol, 2016). Summarized by Wout.[22]
A possible major field in future healthcare is medical nanotechnology, and more specific nanorobots. These robots will work inside the patient at cellular level. The most important stakeholders in robotic healthcare are not the people that develop the technology, but the people that will use it.
There are three main ways in which robotics can be deployed in healthcare: Direct patient care (e.g. robots used in surgeries), Indirect patient care (e.g. robots delivering medicine), Home healthcare (e.g. robots that keep the elderly company).
Acceptance of Healthcare Robots for the Older Population: Review and Future Directions (E. Broadbent, et al. 2009). Summarized by Wout.[23]
It is projected that the proportion of people older than the age of 60 will double between 2000 and 2050. This increases the need for healthcare. Alongside this there is also a shortage of people working in the healthcare industry. In western countries, most of the older people want to remain living independently in their own homes for as long as possible. To facilitate this, smart solutions need to be found, for example healthcare robots.
Of great importance is the acceptance of healthcare robots by the people in need of care. There are three requirements for acceptance of a robot to occur: motivation for using the robot, sufficient user-friendliness and a feeling of comfort with the robot.
Healthcare robots need to be able to adapt to individual differences since not all patients are equal.
Basic healthcare robots have been developed which can assist with simple tasks like: assist in walking, reminding of doctors appointments, carry objects, lift patients, providing companionship. Mitsubishi sold the first commercially available mobile robot in 2005. This robot is designed to help in the home.
The older the age, the less willing people are to use robots. Older people are more fearful of new technology. However, they are more willing to accept assistive devices if this helps them maintain their independence.
Studies have shown that people prefer robots that do not have a human-like appearance. For companionship robots an animal-like appearance is preferred. Other examples of desired characteristics of a robot for the elderly are slow moving, safe, reliable, small and easy to use. Older people also appreciate having some form of control over the robot because this reinforces their sense of independence.
Medical Robots: Current Systems and Research Directions (R. A. Beasley, 2012). Summarized by Wout.[24]
An example of a great success in medical robotics is the surgical robot da Vinci. The biggest impact of medical robots has been improving surgeries that require great precision.
Medical robots can be employed during brain surgeries. By using medical images (e.g. CT-scan) a robotic arm can orient the tools in the correct direction, or the surgeon can specify a target which the robot guides the instrument towards with submillimetre accuracy. Medical robots are also used to assist in spine surgery.
Another application field of medical robots is orthopaedics (e.g. hip or knee replacement). An example of such a robot is Robodoc, which is used for milling automatically according to a surgical plan. Other devices, like the RIO, are designed such that the robot and the surgeon hold the tool simultaneously. The RIO ensures that the surgeon makes the correct movements.
There also exist devices which are controlled by the surgeon (technically not robots). The surgeon uses joysticks to manipulate the tools with great precision. An example of such machines are the Zeus and the da Vinci. These systems filter out hand tremors and enable the surgeon and patient to not be at the same location.
InnoMotion is a robot arm which can accurately guide a needle using CT or MRI imaging.
Robots exist that can help a surgeon guide a tube through a patient’s blood vessel. The surgeon can steer the tube and force feedback sensors tell the surgeon how much pressure is being applied.
Robotic arms are also used in radiosurgery, in which a specific area inside the patient is targeted with beams of ionizing radiation from multiple angles.
Robots are also used to perform CPR. A band is placed around the patient’s chest which is pulled tight by an actuator to compress the chest. The tightness of the band is adjusted based on the patient’s chest size.
Microprocessor-controlled prosthetics are prosthetics in which the patient is assisted in the movement or are controlled by the patient to perform movements which have been lost (e.g. exoskeletons).
Another area of medical robots consists of assistive and rehabilitation systems. These include things like a controllable arm holding a spoon or a grasper which can be attached to a wheelchair.
In the future, medical robots will become smaller and cheaper. More functionality will be added. Also, robots will be used more for medical training. Medical robots need to provide solutions to real problems, otherwise there is a change that they are displaced by other medical advancements.
Medical robots go soft (E. Strickland, 2017). Summarized by Wout.[25]
New kinds of medical robots are being developed of which the parts that touch the patient are soft. This is to prevent damage to organs and blood vessels and makes sure the human body does not surround the object with scar tissue which can diminish its effectiveness.
An example of a soft medical robot is a sleeve that surrounds the hart. This sleeve contains rings which can be pneumatically inflated to detect and force a heartbeat in a certain tempo.
Another example is a device which can be implemented in the body to give of small dosages of a drug. This device is made of a soft gel with a mechanism inside which can be activated from outside the body.
A final example is a soft gripper-hand made of hydrogel. The hand can be actuated by forcing water into the hand. This hand can be placed on a robotic arm and used for grabbing organs inside the human body without damaging them.
Robots in Health and Social Care: A Complementary Technology to Home Care and Telehealthcare? (T. Dahl, et al. 2013). Summarized by Lieke.[26]
This article discusses several specific robotics applications.The robots that were considered were classified in 9 categories: Surgery robots, Robots supporting Human-Robot interaction tasks, Robots providing logistics in care home environments, Telepresence and companion robots, Humanoid robots for entertaining and educating children with special needs, Robots as motivational coaches, Home assistance robots for an ageing society, Human-Robot relationships in medical care and society, and Human- Robot relationships in medical and care situations.
Between these categories, there are a few ingredients for success that can be found. The general ingredients for success include: Adequate level of personalization, Appropriate safety levels, Proper object manipulation and navigation in unstructured environments, Patient/user safety, Reliability and robustness and Sustainability. In addition, robots that serve motivational or social purposes also need to be personable, intelligent and highly interactive.
However, there are also some concerns with using robots extensively. For example, humanoid robots need to have a set-up etiquette, like following the eyes of a talking person. What also needs to be kept in mind, especially using social robots with elderly people, is that the extensive use of robots could lead to a potential reduction of human contact, social isolation, an increasing feeling of objectification and a loss of privacy. Furthermore, cost effectiveness plays a great deal in the practical use of robots.
Multimedia Companion for Patients in Minimally Conscious State (MCS)
Novel imaging techniques have enabled communication with minimally conscious patients. The idea is to create a multimedia system for patients in MCS. This system would project films, music and videos of family members. This system can communicate with the patient only with binary (yes or no) questions. Communication is used to let the patient navigate the multimedia system (i.e. choosing what to watch or do). The yes or no answers are given by the patient's ability to modulate brain activity. The patient's response is decoded by sensing which areas of the brain intensify in activity.
System:"Do you want to watch the news? If YES imagine playing tennis. If NO imagine walking in the rooms of your house."
Patient: The patient imagines to play tennis.
The motor area of the patient's brain activates.
Activity is recorded by the system.
The system plays the latest bulletin.
Articles
- First technique using functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and PET.
The Aware Mind in the Motionless Body (M. M. Monti, A. M. Owen, 2010)[27] & Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State (A. Owen et al., 2006)[28]
Case Study: Martha
Martha, a young woman of not even 30 years old is victim of a car accident. She survives the accident and slips into coma; her eyes are closed, her body is motionless and unable to breath autonomously. After a week her eyes open, her body is able to breathe again autonomously and even makes small movements. For example, she yawns, she stretches her arms and slightly moves her body in her bed. It seems she is even able to sleep and wake up.
Vegetative State, Comatose state, and sleep
When a patient in a comatose state is able to sleep and wake up again, she/he is said to be in the Vegetative State (VS). A patient in a vegetative state might have his/her eyes open, can breathe autonomously, can move his/her body, can produce urine, and can vocalize sounds. The big question, are patients in vegetative state conscious? Consciousness is made of wakefulness and awareness. A healthy person is both awake and aware, when not asleep. A comatose patient is neither awake nor aware. While a patient in vegetative state is awake, but is not aware. Now around 40% of patients diagnosed in the vegetative state seem to be aware. Therefore, these misdiagnosed patients are said to be in a Minimally Conscious State (MCS). Often while diagnosing patients the “Lack of evidence of consciousness is, in this situation, equated to evidence of lack of consciousness” (Monti, Owen, 2008)(i.e. False Negative). To distinguish patients in MCS from VS one of three factors must be met:
• Awareness of the environment
• Sustained, reproducible, purposeful or voluntary response to visual or tactile stimuli
• Language comprehension and/or expression
Novel neuroimaging techniques are used to detect markers of consciousness, such as Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI).
Experiment 1: brain response to speech of patients in VS
Two patients in VS showed brain activities similar to healthy volunteers in response to speech and picture of faces. The two patients in VS listened to simple and complex (semantically ambiguous) sentences. The complex sentences activated, in the VS patients, the same brain area as in healthy volunteers. Furthermore, similar experiments were conducted with healthy volunteers heavily sedated. In the heavily sedated volunteers, no activation of the same area was recorded. This shows a higher level of awareness (some language comprehension) in the VS patients than the sedated volunteers. Nevertheless, simple brain responses cannot be taken as a factors of awareness nor consciousness. Much of sensory processing is automatic. Such as lines depicting a face or speech of a familiar language. Therefore, the type of stimuli and the type of brain activity recorded must be attentively chosen.
Experiment 2: voluntary modulation of brain activity in VS patient
A young woman victim of a car accident slips into coma, then wakes up again, but is diagnosed in the Vegetative State. The patient was given spoken instruction. The first instruction was to imagine playing tennis. The second, to imagine walking in her own apartment. When the patient was instructed to imagine playing tennis intense activity in the motor area of the brain was recorded. While when she was asked to imagine walking in her apartment activity in the parahippocampal gyrus (memory retrieval area), posterior parietal cortex (spatial reasoning area) and some motor areas. Healthy control volunteers, given the same instructions, reproduce the same brain activity of the VS patient. Unless the volunteers did not understand the instructions or decided to not comply with them. Therefore, in this experiment the idea of an automatic brain response is discredited.
- Second technique using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in combination with high density Electroencephalography (TMS/hd-EEG). This technique is much more practical and portable than fMRI or PET.
A perturbational approach for evaluating the brain’s capacity for consciousness (M. Massimini et al. 2009)[29]
It does not confirm if a person is conscious or not. The technique weighs the capacity of the brain for consciousness. The technique does not require any input from the user. In this article the technique has only been used to differentiate brain response, to TMS excitation, in three conscious states: wakefulness, long-wave sleep, and REM sleep. More research must be done with sedated patients [30], and patients with brain injuries [31] (i.e. Minimally Conscious State or Vegetative State).
1. Start from a theory describing how consciousness is created. Integrated Information Theory of Consciousness (IITC) suggests that consciousness is created by a physical system.
2. Measure the brain’s capacity to generate consciousness. Measurement is done by poking (exciting) the concerned physical systems, with TMS, and record the response, with hd-EEG.
Results: Brain responses to TMS during wakefulness are similar to those during REM sleep, showing effective connectivity between brain areas (i.e. the stimuli travel between various regions). While long wave sleep shows loss of cortical integration (i.e. the stimuli remains local).
Similar systems
Here, an overview of similar COVID-19 (or other disease) symptom detection systems are given.
Privacy issues and regulations
Here, an overview of possible privacy issues and corresponding regulations are given for the COVID-19 symptom detection system.
(Look at privacy issues regarding government COVID-19 app)
Design
In this section, first, all things taken into account during the design proces and the choices made to come to a final design are elaborated. After that the final hardware- and software design are given.
RPC's
Here, the RPC's for the COVID-19 symptom detection system are given. These RPC's are based on the previously mentioned users needs.
Requirements
Preferences
Constraints
Privacy
(Pick random person once in a while so that passersby do not know if person being tested actually has manifested symptoms or not. Let human pick randomly or let system pick randomly?)
What happens after testing?
After the testing is done, the people who are tested negative can continue in the Heuvel Galerie. For people who are tested positive it gets a bit more complicated.
The Heuvel Galerie is real estate that is a part of the private company CBRE Global Investors, and any measures being taken have to go by them. It is assumed from here on forward that they agree with the measures being suggested.
When people are tested positive, it is recommended that the Heuvel Galerie denies them access. Such a temporary prohibition is legal even if it is only verbally commanded by the owner, on the grounds of the law of "huis- of lokaalvredebreuk". In article 5:1 of the "Burgerlijk Wetboek" it can be found that ownership is the most inclusive right a person can have on a company, which means that the owner decides who can go in and under which conditions. If CBRE Global Investors would write a statement that people who have been tested positive in the testconditions specified in this study are to be denied access, they have no legal right to enter the building.
By denying positive tested people acces, the Heuvel Galerie can create a safe shopping environment.
Psychological effects
In order to decrease COVID-19 spread it is very important that people are careful themselves. At the time of writing the article in September 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has been in the Netherlands for about half a year. In the period of June 17th to June 30th, Eindhoven had 9 infected people according to the RIVM[32], and since then the number started exponentialy increasing to 117 infections in the period form August 26th to September 8th. Because the number of infections in Eindhoven and its regions has been relatively low for some time, the perceived risk of COVID-19 has gone down a lot. This results in people being less careful. In order to make people more aware and careful, visibility is very important. Visibility can be manifested in different ways. People you know being infected is an example of visibility. Other, more preferable examples are medi and visible coronameasures. A visible center of coronadetection of course falls under the last category. Several steps can be taken to manipulate people in being more careful by improving the design of the center and the surroundings.
People are different, and this has to be taken into account in the persuasion process. There are, on one hand, high-self-monitoring individuals, who mostly serve a social-adjustive function, and on the other hand low-self-monitoring individuals, who serve a value-expressive function. The high-self-monitoring group is more easily persuaded by messages that focus on facilitating social interaction and enhancing cohesion, and the low-self-monitoring group is more easily persuaded by messages that focus on core values or beliefs.[33] This can be implemented in the design process by making posters for example, where one type of poster is designed to target the high-self-monitoring group, and another type of poster is designed to target the low-self-monitoring group. For the high-self-monitoring group this poster should focus on the social groups the people could be in, and imply that not adhering to the rules lowers your cohesion with the group. For the low-self-monitoring group the focus should lie on complying to the rules because of valueing for example life, health, decency and common sense.
People behave differently when they are self-aware and non-self-aware.[34] If people are self-aware they are more likely to act according to the way they perceive themselves or how they think they should behave, which is mostly better behaviour. The presence of a mirror or an audience can greatly improve self-awareness. [35] In case of the center for symptom detection, self-awareness of surrounding people can be increased by the presence of reflective surfaces such as mirrors and the presence of for example law enforcing people looking around.
(Next week more about perceived risk and perceived professionalism)
Questionnaire
Detection system options
The different types of detection systems that will be used in the center for COVID-19 symptom detection are thermometers for testing temperature and a camera with microphone for cough detection. The camera will not be used for detecting whether people are within a 1.5 meter range of eachother, because it is hard to distinguish between families this way. Another option that will not be implemented is fever screening through thermal imagery, because mass screening for fever requires a resolution that is so high that it does not exist yet. Screening for fever using an IR handgun thermometer could be possible, but only in a controlled environment, and it is not sensitive enough.
Final hardware design
Software
(Pseudocodes)
Cost-benefit analysis
Here, a cost-benefit analysis of the COVID-19 symptom detection system is performed.
Feasibility
Here, a conclusion is drawn on the feasibility of a COVID-19 symptom detection system.
(What are advantages compared to other COVID-19 measures, for example BOA's?)
Conclusion
Here, an overal conclusion on the project is drawn.
Conclusion
Discussion
Recommendation
Peer review
Here, the peer review is given.
Workload
An overview of who has done what per week of the project.
Week 1
Name | Student ID | Hours this week | Tasks |
---|---|---|---|
Davide Fabbro | 1255401 | 9 | Intro videos + first brainstorm (1.5 hours) + Studied and wrote summaries for papers: [5], [6], [16], [15], [27], [28], [29] (6 hours) with small research on [30], [31] (0.2 hours) + second meeting (0.5) + Reorganizing state of the art section (1 hour). |
Lieke Nijhuis | 0943276 | 9 | Intro videos + first brainstorm (1.5 hours) + Studied and wrote summaries for papers: [26], [20], [7], [11], [9], [10], [8] (6.5 hours) second meeting+ sending e-mail (45 minutes) + Describing problem statement and objectives (15 minutes) |
Ikira Wortel | 1334336 | 10 | Intro videos + first brainstorm (1.5 hours) + Studied and wrote summaries for papers [4], [18], [19], [13], [14], [12]and [17](7 hours) + extra meeting discussing chosen subject (0.5 hour) + Who are the users (1 hour) |
Wout Opdam | 1241084 | 12.5 | Intro videos + first brainstorm (1.5 hours) + Start with wiki layout (1 hour) + Studied and wrote summaries for papers: [21], [22], [23],[24] and [25] (5 hours) + wrote about approach and deliverables (0.5 hour) + Made planning for project (2.5 hours) + extra meeting discussing chosen subject (0.5 hour) + Describing user requirements (1.5 hours) |
Week 2
Name | Student ID | Hours this week | Tasks |
---|---|---|---|
Davide Fabbro | 1255401 | Tutor feedback meeting (0.5 hour) + Group meeting (1 hour) + Rewrite focus on COVID-19 symptom detection (0.25 hour) | |
Lieke Nijhuis | 0943276 | Tutor feedback meeting (0.5 hour) + Group meeting (1 hour) + Research and write "what happens after testing" (0.5 hour) + Research psychological effects detections center (5 hours) + Detection systems explanation (0.5 hour) | |
Ikira Wortel | 1334336 | Tutor feedback meeting (0.5 hour) + Group meeting (1 hour) + Redefine USE'ers (1 hour) | |
Wout Opdam | 1241084 | Tutor feedback meeting (0.5 hour) + Group meeting (1 hour) + Revised project planning (1.5 hours) + Re-designed wiki layout (1 hour) + Describe use case Heuvel Galerie and learn wiki page formatting (1.5 hours) + Redefine USE'er requirements (1.5 hours) |
References
- ↑ [1] Bookelaar, N. (2015). Ingang van winkelcentrum Heuvel Eindhoven aan de westzijde van het gebouw.
- ↑ [2] Healy. Baker. (2001). Where People Shop. Commascon 2001
- ↑ [3] Heuvel Eindhoven. Heuvel Eindhoven Drukteprofiel.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 [4] Imran, A., Posokhova, I., Qureshi, H. N., Masood, U., Riaz, S., Ali, K., John, C. N., Hussain, I., & Nabeel, M. (2020). AI4COVID-19: AI enabled preliminary diagnosis for COVID-19 from cough samples via an app. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked, 20, 100378.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 [5] Brown, C., Chauhan, J., Grammenos, A., Han, J., Hasthanasombat, A., Spathis, D., Xia, T., Cicuta, P., & Mascolo, C. (2020). Exploring Automatic Diagnosis of COVID-19 from Crowdsourced Respiratory Sound Data. 3474–3484.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 [6] Chung, K. F., Bolser, D., Davenport, P., Fontana, G., Morice, A., & Widdicombe, J. (2009). Semantics and types of cough. Pulmonary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 22(2), 139–142.
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 [7] Gostic, K. M., Gomez, A. C. R., Mummah, R. O., Kucharski, A. J., & Lloyd-Smith, J. O. (2020). Estimated effectiveness of symptom and risk screening to prevent the spread of COVID-19. ELife, 9.
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 [8] Menni, C., Valdes, A. M., Freidin, M. B., Sudre, C. H., Nguyen, L. H., Drew, D. A., Ganesh, S., Varsavsky, T., Cardoso, M. J., El-Sayed Moustafa, J. S., Visconti, A., Hysi, P., Bowyer, R. C. E., Mangino, M., Falchi, M., Wolf, J., Ourselin, S., Chan, A. T., Steves, C. J., & Spector, T. D. (2020). Real-time tracking of self-reported symptoms to predict potential COVID-19. Nature Medicine, 26(7), 1037–1040.
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 [9] Gandhi, M., Yokoe, D. S., & Havlir, D. V. (2020). Asymptomatic transmission, the achilles’ heel of current strategies to control Covid-19. In New England Journal of Medicine (Vol. 382, Issue 22, pp. 2158–2160). Massachussetts Medical Society.
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 [10] Lerner, A., Chrysanthou, Y., & Lischinski, D. (2007). Crowds by example. Computer Graphics Forum, 26(3), 655–664.
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 [11] Udugama, B., Kadhiresan, P., Kozlowski, H. N., Malekjahani, A., Osborne, M., Li, V. Y. C., Chen, H., Mubareka, S., Gubbay, J. B., & Chan, W. C. W. (2020). Diagnosing COVID-19: The Disease and Tools for Detection. In ACS nano (Vol. 14, Issue 4, pp. 3822–3835). NLM (Medline).
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 [12] Pokhrel, P., Hu, C., & Mao, H. (2020). Detecting the Coronavirus (COVID-19). ACS Sensors, 5, 2283–2296.
- ↑ 13.0 13.1 [13] Fletcher, T., Whittam, A., Simpson, R., & Machin, G. (2018). Comparison of non-contact infrared skin thermometers. Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology, 42(2), 65–71.
- ↑ 14.0 14.1 [14] Tay, M. R., Low, Y. L., Zhao, X., Cook, A. R., & Lee, V. J. (2015). Comparison of Infrared Thermal Detection Systems for mass fever screening in a tropical healthcare setting. Public Health, 129(11), 1471–1478.
- ↑ 15.0 15.1 [15] Crowd temp screening is a joke, one tech expert says | FierceElectronics. (n.d.). Retrieved September 4, 2020, from Webarticle
- ↑ 16.0 16.1 [16] Pereira, C. B., Yu, X., Czaplik, M., Rossaint, R., Blazek, V., & Leonhardt, S. (2015). Remote monitoring of breathing dynamics using infrared thermography. Biomedical Optics Express, 6(11), 4378.
- ↑ 17.0 17.1 [17] Winkler, T., & Rinner, B. (2010). A systematic approach towards user-centric privacy and security for smart camera networks. ICDSC - 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Distributed Smart Cameras, 133–141.
- ↑ 18.0 18.1 [18] Apthorpe, N., Reisman, D., & Feamster, N. (2017). A Smart Home is No Castle: Privacy Vulnerabilities of Encrypted IoT Traffic.
- ↑ 19.0 19.1 [19] Offermann-Van Heek, J., Arning, K., & Ziefle, M. (2019). All Eyes on You! Impact of Location, Camera Type, and Privacy-Security-Trade-off on the Acceptance of Surveillance Technologies. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 921, 131–149.
- ↑ 20.0 20.1 [20] Ackerman, E. (n.d.). Autonomous Robots Are Helping Kill Coronavirus in Hospitals - IEEE Spectrum. Retrieved September 6, 2020.
- ↑ 21.0 21.1 [21] Davies, N. (2016). Can robots handle your healthcare? Engineering and Technology, 11(9), 58–61.
- ↑ 22.0 22.1 [22] Nichol, P. B. How medical robots will change healthcare | CIO. Retrieved September 5, 2020.
- ↑ 23.0 23.1 [23] Broadbent, E., Stafford, R., & MacDonald, B. (2009). Acceptance of healthcare robots for the older population: Review and future directions. In International Journal of Social Robotics (Vol. 1, Issue 4, pp. 319–330). Springer.
- ↑ 24.0 24.1 [24] Beasley, R. A. (2012). Medical Robots: Current Systems and Research Directions. Journal of Robotics, 2012, 1–14.
- ↑ 25.0 25.1 [25] Strickland, E. (2017). Medical robots go soft [News]. IEEE Spectrum, 54(4), 11–12.
- ↑ 26.0 26.1 [26] Dahl, T., & Boulos, M. (2013). Robots in Health and Social Care: A Complementary Technology to Home Care and Telehealthcare? Robotics, 3(1), 1–21.
- ↑ 27.0 27.1 [27] Monti, M. M., & Owen, A. M. (2010). The aware mind in the motionless body. Psychologist, 23(6), 478–481.
- ↑ 28.0 28.1 [28] Owen, A. M., Coleman, M. R., Boly, M., Davis, M. H., Laureys, S., & Pickard, J. D. (2006). Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State. Science, 313(5792), 1402 LP – 1402.
- ↑ 29.0 29.1 [29] Massimini, M., Boly, M., Casali, A., Rosanova, M., & Tononi, G. (2009). A perturbational approach for evaluating the brain’s capacity for consciousness. In Progress in Brain Research (Vol. 177, Issue C, pp. 201–214). Elsevier.
- ↑ 30.0 30.1 [30] Ferrarelli, F., Massimini, M., Sarasso, S., Casali, A., Riedner, B. A., Angelini, G., Tononi, G., & Pearce, R. A. (2010). Breakdown in cortical effective connectivity during midazolam-induced loss of consciousness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(6), 2681–2686.
- ↑ 31.0 31.1 [31] Sarasso, S., Rosanova, M., Casali, A. G., Casarotto, S., Fecchio, M., Boly, M., Gosseries, O., Tononi, G., Laureys, S., & Massimini, M. (2014). Quantifying cortical EEG responses to TMS in (Un)consciousness. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience, 45(1), 40–49.
- ↑ Actuele informatie over het nieuwe coronavirus (COVID-19). (2020). RIVM. https://www.rivm.nl/coronavirus-covid-19/actueel
- ↑ DeBono, K. G. (1987). Investigating the social-adjustive and value-expressive functions of attitudes: Implications for persuasion processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(2), 279–287. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.2.279
- ↑ Gibbons, F. X. (1990). The impact of focus of attention and affect on social behaviour. Shyness and embarrassment: Perspectives from social psychology, 119-143.
- ↑ Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1978). Self-focusing effects of dispositional self-consciousness, mirror presence, and audience presence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(3), 324–332. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.3.324.