PRE2018 4 Group4: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
='''First meeting (6 may 2019)'''= | ='''First meeting (6 may 2019)'''= | ||
==Planning== | |||
Literature search pointed out that acceptance of robots in educational roles is a difficult subject. We chose to focus on educational robots in elementary school or below, as it includes a major part of child upbringing. We will focus on a robot with a more supportive role than an actual replacement. There is high demand for teachers, and robots form a solution to fill this gap between supply and demand. We want to conduct research on the possible functions the robot can fill in the classroom, to subsequently compare them and create an expectation. This expectation can thereafter be compared to a practical example (asking teachers), to subsequently elaborate and conclude the best function. Furthermore, we want to program this function in to an actual robot if possible (i.e. "Nao" robot). <br /> | Literature search pointed out that acceptance of robots in educational roles is a difficult subject. We chose to focus on educational robots in elementary school or below, as it includes a major part of child upbringing. We will focus on a robot with a more supportive role than an actual replacement. There is high demand for teachers, and robots form a solution to fill this gap between supply and demand. We want to conduct research on the possible functions the robot can fill in the classroom, to subsequently compare them and create an expectation. This expectation can thereafter be compared to a practical example (asking teachers), to subsequently elaborate and conclude the best function. Furthermore, we want to program this function in to an actual robot if possible (i.e. "Nao" robot). <br /> | ||
| Line 52: | Line 55: | ||
'''Milestones:''' know best position for the robot. Robot performs an actual task. <br /> | '''Milestones:''' know best position for the robot. Robot performs an actual task. <br /> | ||
'''Deliverable:''' lend “Nao” robot and program a task. | '''Deliverable:''' lend “Nao” robot and program a task. | ||
==SotA== | |||
='''Second meeting (13 may 2019)'''= | ='''Second meeting (13 may 2019)'''= | ||
Revision as of 15:06, 2 May 2019
| Student | Student Number |
| Anne Aarts | 1026630 |
| Rick van Beek | 1243355 |
| Bjarne Kraak | 1262580 |
| Paul van Dijk | 1278347 |
| Pelle Schram | 1252089 |
First meeting (6 may 2019)
Planning
Literature search pointed out that acceptance of robots in educational roles is a difficult subject. We chose to focus on educational robots in elementary school or below, as it includes a major part of child upbringing. We will focus on a robot with a more supportive role than an actual replacement. There is high demand for teachers, and robots form a solution to fill this gap between supply and demand. We want to conduct research on the possible functions the robot can fill in the classroom, to subsequently compare them and create an expectation. This expectation can thereafter be compared to a practical example (asking teachers), to subsequently elaborate and conclude the best function. Furthermore, we want to program this function in to an actual robot if possible (i.e. "Nao" robot).
We want to research the possible social functions the robot could fill combined with the ethical questions that arise when doing so, as this is the main problem with acceptance towards robots used for educational purposes in early stages of life.
Problem statement
Develop a robot technology in kindergarten which assists the teacher in education and reliefs work stress, with the quality of education staying the same or improving. Conduct extensive literature research and acquire practical experience to determine the best placement fit for the robot.
Target audience: kindergarten (4-6 years). Children are in one of their primary development stages, robots can have a major influence on them.
Objectives: educational quality stays the same/improves with the use of assistive robots. Elevating stress for the teachers.
With the pracitcal research, we want to ask teachers where they would see the robot fit best, rather than asking whether or not they want a robot in their classroom.
Users:
- Children: same quality of education. More equal distribution of attention among the children. More personal attention in general.
- Teacher: relief work stress.
- Parents: acceptance of the robots in the environment of the child. Give away a part of the child’s nursery.
- Government: better quality of education, less money spent if possible.
- Enterprises: want business opportunities.
Approach
The approach of this project will be as following:
- Literature research to generate mutual understanding of the subject.
- Create a plan where the robot could fit, a general idea and discuss the several functions of a kindergarten teacher.
- Subsequently, visit a kindergarten class and experience the environment. Ask the teacher what their perspective is on the best placement of the robot in the class by discussing the previously made plan.
- Thereafter, discuss and choose the best placement of the robot in the class.
- Lastly, program the Nao to perform that certain function.
Milestones: know best position for the robot. Robot performs an actual task.
Deliverable: lend “Nao” robot and program a task.