PRE2017 4 Groep6

Group members

• David van den Beld, 1001770
• Gerben Erens, 0997906
• Luc Kleinman, 1008097
• Maikel Morren, 1002099
• Adine van Wier, 0999813

Project pages

For all the branches of the project diverging from the initial set-up and planning, please see their respective pages

• General Literature Review
• Extended Literature Review
• User and product analysis
• Case studies
• Desinging the robot
• Project conclusion
• Project reflection

This page itself is dedicated to general information about the project.

Project

Project Statement

Wildfires are occurring throughout the world at an increasing rate. Great droughts in various regions across the globe are increasing the possibility of wildfires. National parks deal with major wildfires multiple times over a year. Areas devastated by wildfires are mostly devoid of life, while potentially still having an extremely fertile soil with all the biomass left after the fire. Artificial reforestation can accelerate the natural process which accounts for the regrowth of the forests. This process might be enhanced by means of technology, for example by deploying robots that plant seeds of saplings in these areas. This project investigates the possibility and potential of utilizing robots to restore these devastated areas to their former glory. In order to investigate this possibility, a thorough analysis on different methods of deforestation is made first. By comparing methods of reforestation a lot can be learnt about what aspects the reforestation-robot should be an improvement on compared to older reforestation methods. Also, this analysis will explore if a new method of reforestation is needed at all. Beyond this, two case studies are investigated. These case studies show situations in which the envisioned robot could be put to use. The case studies help get a better understanding of how the robot is used and therefore what criteria should be taken into account when designing the robot. Finally, a design is made of the robot which would accomplish all necessities found during the analysis of the different reforestation methods and which follows all the criteria discovered in the case studies. Multiple preliminary designs are made, of which one was chosen based on meeting the criteria, it is this robots that is designed in more detail. To conclude, this project aims to assess the necessity of a robot to rebuild a forest in a national park after a forest fire. Discover the functionalities such a robot must have and make a potential design based on the gained information.

Planning

Below follows the planning for the project for the upcoming 9 weeks constituting the course 0LAUK0 Project: Robots Everywhere.

Table 1: Final project planning after revision problem statement and goals

Week number	Task	Person assigned
1
	Choose definitive subject	Collaborative effort of all members
	Define problem statement and objectives	David
	Define users	Adine
	Obtain user requirements	Gerben
	Work out typical use cases	Luc
	Define the milestones and deliverables	Maikel
	Define the approach of the problem	Collaborative effort of all members
	Search for relevant state-of-the-art (SotA) sources, categories: Modularity (Semi-) Autonomous cars Sensors for prospecting/evaluating ground Drilling/plowing/seeding mechanism Current Forestation combat methods	All divided into the subcategories: Maikel David Luc Gerben Adine
	Make project planning	Collaborative effort of all members
2
	Review user requirements and use cases	Collaborative effort of all members
	Finish collecting SotA articles and write SotA section	Each member for their respective subcategory
	Research different application sectors for reforestation to narrow problem statement: Reforestation in logging industry Reforestation in national parks after forest fires Reforestation in nature reserves and rain forests	All divided into categories: Adine & Maikel David & Gerben Luc
	Make preliminary robot designs for the following seeding mechanisms: Drilling robot Sprinkler robot Plow robot	Divided into: David Gerben Maikel
3
	Review and narrowing of problem statement	Collaborative effort of all members
	Extended literature review on specific subject of reforestation: Biodiversity and need for control Natural reforestation versus artificial reforestation Direct seeding (manual seeding) Aerial seeding	All divided into the following categories: Collaborative effort of all group members during own research David & Adine Luc & Gerben Maikel
	Rewrite problem statement	Luc
	Review users for narrowed problem	Adine
4
	Edit the general literature review on wiki	Maikel
	Research the costs of reforestation methods: Natural reforestation Aerial reforestation Manual reforestation	Divided by: Adine Maikel Luc
	Rewrite segment of need for control and biodiversity into one introductory segement	David
	Start making 3D skechtes of preliminary designs	Gerben
	Document wiki on extended literature review page	Adine
	Start keeping a log of the research and design process	Adine
	Look for case studies	Maikel & Luc
5
	Write case studies	Maikel & Luc
	Remake planning to fit new goal of the project	Maikel
	Redefine objectives to fit new goal of project	David
	Rewrite drilling mechanism section	Gerben
	Finish a first 3D model	Gerben
6
	Continue 3D modelling	Gerben
	Elaborate and extend upon current preliminary designs (including sketch)	Maikel, Gerben & David
	Write wiki page for case studies	Luc & Maikel
	Evaluate designs using criteria from literature study	Adine
7
	Make a concept for fully functional robot and report on the wiki	Maikel & Luc
	Reflect on project	David & Maikel
	Make a draft for final presentation	David & Adine
	Reach and write overall project conclusion	Collaborative effort of all members
8
	Buffer time	Collaborative effort of all members
	Finish final presentation	Adine, David & Maikel
	Complete wiki	Gerben, Luc

Approach

The problem will be approached by a design question. What is the best design for a robot to combat deforestation which will be build modular so that it can be implemented for other purposes with minor changes. The first 2 weeks the approach will primarily be sequential, as user analysis, use cases and requirements/preferences/constraints need to be done sequentially before the rest of the project can start. Once this is over, the project will run in a parallel fashion where building and modelling will happen simultaneously.

Milestones and Deliverables

Table 2: Milestones

Date	Accomplished
30-04-2018	SotA research done
03-05-2018	User analysis/use cases done
07-05-2018	Have a partially eliminated list of designs
10-05-2018	Pick final “winner” design
21-05-2018	Have the first working subsystem
25-05-2018	Finish modelling
31-05-2018	Have an operational prototype running with at least 2 subsystems
07-06-2018	Made several concepts for modules
11-06-2018	Presentation is finished
14-06-2018	Wiki is completely updated