PRE2017 4 Groep6: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
=== Project Statement === | === Project Statement === | ||
Wildfires are occurring throughout the world at an increasing rate. Great droughts in various regions across the globe are increasing the possibility of wildfires. National parks deal with major wildfires multiple times over a year. Areas devastated by wildfires are mostly devoid of life, while still having an extremely fertile soil with all the biomass left after the fire. Artificial reforestation can accelerate | Wildfires are occurring throughout the world at an increasing rate. Great droughts in various regions across the globe are increasing the possibility of wildfires. National parks deal with major wildfires multiple times over a year. Areas devastated by wildfires are mostly devoid of life, while potentially still having an extremely fertile soil with all the biomass left after the fire. Artificial reforestation can accelerate the natural process which accounts for the regrowth of the forests. | ||
This process might be enhanced by means of technology, for example by deploying robots that plant seeds of saplings in these areas. This project investigates the possibility and potential of | This process might be enhanced by means of technology, for example by deploying robots that plant seeds of saplings in these areas. This project investigates the possibility and potential of utilizing robots to restore these devastated areas to their former glory. | ||
In order to investigate this possibility, a thorough analysis on different methods of deforestation is made first. By comparing methods of reforestation a lot can be learnt about what aspects the reforestation-robot should be an improvement on compared to older reforestation methods. | |||
Also, this analysis will explore if a new method of reforestation is needed at all. Beyond this, two case studies are investigated. These case studies show situations in which the envisioned robot could be put to use. The case studies help get a better understanding of how the robot is used and therefore what criteria should be taken into account when designing the robot. | |||
Finally, a design is made of the robot which would accomplish all necessities found during the analysis of the different reforestation methods and which follows all the criteria discovered in the case studies. Multiple preliminary designs are made, of which one was chosen based on meeting the criteria, it is this robots that is designed in more detail. | |||
To conclude, this project aims to assess the necessity of a robot to rebuild a forest in a national park after a forest fire. Discover the functionalities such a robot must have and make a potential design based on the gained information. | |||
=== Planning === | === Planning === |
Revision as of 16:57, 26 May 2018
Group members
- David van den Beld, 1001770
- Gerben Erens, 0997906
- Luc Kleinman, 1008097
- Maikel Morren, 1002099
- Adine van Wier, 0999813
Project pages
For all the branches of the project diverging from the initial set-up and planning, please see their respective pages
- General Literature Review
- Extended Literature Review
- User and product analysis
- Desinging the robot
- Project conclusion
- Project reflection
This page itself is dedicated to general information about the project.
Project
Project Statement
Wildfires are occurring throughout the world at an increasing rate. Great droughts in various regions across the globe are increasing the possibility of wildfires. National parks deal with major wildfires multiple times over a year. Areas devastated by wildfires are mostly devoid of life, while potentially still having an extremely fertile soil with all the biomass left after the fire. Artificial reforestation can accelerate the natural process which accounts for the regrowth of the forests. This process might be enhanced by means of technology, for example by deploying robots that plant seeds of saplings in these areas. This project investigates the possibility and potential of utilizing robots to restore these devastated areas to their former glory. In order to investigate this possibility, a thorough analysis on different methods of deforestation is made first. By comparing methods of reforestation a lot can be learnt about what aspects the reforestation-robot should be an improvement on compared to older reforestation methods. Also, this analysis will explore if a new method of reforestation is needed at all. Beyond this, two case studies are investigated. These case studies show situations in which the envisioned robot could be put to use. The case studies help get a better understanding of how the robot is used and therefore what criteria should be taken into account when designing the robot. Finally, a design is made of the robot which would accomplish all necessities found during the analysis of the different reforestation methods and which follows all the criteria discovered in the case studies. Multiple preliminary designs are made, of which one was chosen based on meeting the criteria, it is this robots that is designed in more detail. To conclude, this project aims to assess the necessity of a robot to rebuild a forest in a national park after a forest fire. Discover the functionalities such a robot must have and make a potential design based on the gained information.
Planning
Below follows the planning for the project for the upcoming 9 weeks constituting the course 0LAUK0 Project: Robots Everywhere.
Week number | Task | Person assigned |
---|---|---|
1 | ||
Choose definitive subject | Collaborative effort of all members | |
Define problem statement and objectives | David | |
Define users | Adine | |
Obtain user requirements | Gerben | |
Work out typical use cases | Luc | |
Define the milestones and deliverables | Maikel | |
Define the approach of the problem | Collaborative effort of all members | |
Search for relevant state-of-the-art (SotA) sources, categories:
|
All divided into the subcategories:
| |
Make project planning | Collaborative effort of all members | |
2 | ||
Review user requirements and use cases | Collaborative effort of all members | |
Finish collecting SotA articles and write SotA section | Each member for their respective subcategory | |
Research different application sectors for reforestation to narrow problem statement:
|
All divided into categories:
| |
Make preliminary robot designs for the following seeding mechanisms:
|
Divided into:
| |
3 | ||
Review and narrowing of problem statement | Collaborative effort of all members | |
Extended literature review on specific subject of reforestation:
|
All divided into the following categories:
| |
Rewrite problem statement | Luc | |
Review users for narrowed problem | Adine | |
4 | ||
Edit the general literature review on wiki | Maikel | |
Research the costs of reforestation methods:
|
Divided by:
| |
Rewrite segment of need for control and biodiversity into one introductory segement | David | |
Start making 3D skechtes of preliminary designs | Gerben | |
Document wiki on extended literature review page | Adine | |
Start keeping a log of the research and design process | Adine | |
Look for case studies | Maikel & Luc | |
5 | ||
Write case studies | Maikel & Luc | |
Remake planning to fit new goal of the project | Maikel | |
Redefine objectives to fit new goal of project | David | |
Rewrite drilling mechanism section | Gerben | |
Finish a first 3D model | Gerben | |
6 | ||
Continue 3D modelling | Gerben | |
Elaborate and extend upon current preliminary designs (including sketch) | Maikel, Gerben & David | |
Write wiki page for case studies | Luc & Maikel | |
Evaluate designs using criteria from literature study | Adine | |
7 | ||
Make a concept for fully functional robot and report on the wiki | Maikel & Luc | |
Reflect on project | David & Maikel | |
Make a draft for final presentation | David & Adine | |
Reach and write overall project conclusion | Collaborative effort of all members | |
8 | ||
Buffer time | Collaborative effort of all members | |
Finish final presentation | Adine, David & Maikel | |
Complete wiki | Gerben, Luc |
Approach
The problem will be approached by a design question. What is the best design for a robot to combat deforestation which will be build modular so that it can be implemented for other purposes with minor changes. The first 2 weeks the approach will primarily be sequential, as user analysis, use cases and requirements/preferences/constraints need to be done sequentially before the rest of the project can start. Once this is over, the project will run in a parallel fashion where building and modelling will happen simultaneously.
Milestones and Deliverables
Date | Accomplished |
---|---|
30-04-2018 | SotA research done |
03-05-2018 | User analysis/use cases done |
07-05-2018 | Have a partially eliminated list of designs |
10-05-2018 | Pick final “winner” design |
21-05-2018 | Have the first working subsystem |
25-05-2018 | Finish modelling |
31-05-2018 | Have an operational prototype running with at least 2 subsystems |
07-06-2018 | Made several concepts for modules |
11-06-2018 | Presentation is finished |
14-06-2018 | Wiki is completely updated |