Water Transport Infrastructure: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
= Literature study = | = Literature study = | ||
[[Summary of Literature's]] | [[Summary of Literature's]] | ||
= Need For Robot = | |||
== Why does this problem need to be solved? == | |||
According to Graham et al<ref>Graham JP, Hirai M, Kim S-S (2016) An Analysis of Water Collection Labor among Women and Children in 24 Sub-Saharan African Countries. PLoS ONE 11(6): e0155981. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155981 | |||
</ref>, over 13 million women and 3 million children that are responsible for water collection in their household need to walk for more than 30 minutes. Note that these numbers are from only 24 countries in sub saharan africa, and the scale of the real problem is even larger than these numbers suggest. | |||
The paper also mentions various negative effects this has on these people. One of them is decreased hygiene. In the case of one particular disease(trachoma) has its prevalence almost doubled if water access is further away. Diarrhea also sees significant decreases if water collection time is reduced. | |||
Collection of water is also a physically demanding job. The negative effects of this are studied by Geere et al. in <ref>Geere, J. A. L., Hunter, P. R., & Jagals, P. (2010). Domestic water carrying and its implications for health: a review and mixed methods pilot study in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Environmental Health, 9(1), 52. | |||
</ref>. They report that manual carrying of water results in a serious increase in spinal, neck and head pain. | |||
Children doing manual labour to fetch water has also been linked with decreased school performance<ref>Hemson, D. (2007). ‘The toughest of chores’: policy and practice in children collecting water in South Africa. Policy Futures in Education, 5(3), 315-326. | |||
</ref>. This is mostly linked to fatigue and lower attendance rates of children that need to carry water compared to those that don’t. | |||
Another major concern is the opportunity cost of the time women spend on getting water. Research done by Cairncross and Cuff<ref>Cairncross, S., & Cuff, J. L. (1987). Water use and health in Mueda, Mozambique. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 81(1), 51-54. | |||
</ref> that compared two villages with different access to water found that time saved by reducing travel times to water sources would be used on either other household tasks or used to spent more time with children. This is also backed by research done by Koolwal and Van de Walle<ref>Koolwal, G., & Van de Walle, D. (2013). Access to water, women’s work, and child outcomes. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 61(2), 369-405. | |||
</ref>, which finds that reduced travel times to water access improve children’s education rather than paid-market labour participation. | |||
= References = | = References = | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
Revision as of 13:43, 13 May 2018
Group Members
| Name | Student Id |
|---|---|
| Han Wei Chia | 1002684 |
| Hans Chia | 0979848 |
| Joost Roordink | 1005406 |
| Dennis Rizviç | 1020540 |
| Minjin Song | 1194206 |
| Thomas Gian | 0995114 |
Subject
According to research, one in six people have no access to drinkable water. Even if they have a water source, it takes them hours of travelling long distances to reach it. This causes a harsh environment for humans to survive in. Current methods of transporting water require expensive infrastructure investments, which is often not affordable for areas where water access is limited (they often tend to be fairly poor). We want to see if robots replacing these is a viable option.
Objectives
Our objective investigate the viability of using a robot to replace the manual labor that millions of people need to do to have access to water, compared to other possible solutions to this problem.
Users
The main users are charities that help communities or even the communities themselves that have no convenient access to water in areas with a semi-arid or desert climate. We assume these areas can generate the amount of solar power needed to power the water transport robot for most of the day.
Requirements
Approach
At first we will gather information on the currently existing possible solutions. Then we build a use case through answering questions such as: “What advantages does the robot have over the already existing solutions?”, “How will the logistics of ((bringing to village)) and maintaining the robots work?”. Based on the use case, we can state the technical requirements the robot should have in order to work. Based on the approximate costs of the requirements, we can compare it with other known solutions in terms of pricing. Finally, we will compare all solutions in all perspectives to conclude whether a robot is truly a viable alternative.
Milestones
- Summaries research papers
- USE Aspects
- Locating water research
- Water Transport research
- Water cleansing research
- Existing infrastructure research
- Realize water transport robot
- Incorporate water transport robot in infrastructure.
Deliverables
- Logbook
- Planning
- Final document (including code)
- Presentation
- Research paper of the infrastructure , With Advantages, disadvantages and cost comparisons.
Planning
Literature study
Need For Robot
Why does this problem need to be solved?
According to Graham et al[1], over 13 million women and 3 million children that are responsible for water collection in their household need to walk for more than 30 minutes. Note that these numbers are from only 24 countries in sub saharan africa, and the scale of the real problem is even larger than these numbers suggest. The paper also mentions various negative effects this has on these people. One of them is decreased hygiene. In the case of one particular disease(trachoma) has its prevalence almost doubled if water access is further away. Diarrhea also sees significant decreases if water collection time is reduced. Collection of water is also a physically demanding job. The negative effects of this are studied by Geere et al. in [2]. They report that manual carrying of water results in a serious increase in spinal, neck and head pain. Children doing manual labour to fetch water has also been linked with decreased school performance[3]. This is mostly linked to fatigue and lower attendance rates of children that need to carry water compared to those that don’t. Another major concern is the opportunity cost of the time women spend on getting water. Research done by Cairncross and Cuff[4] that compared two villages with different access to water found that time saved by reducing travel times to water sources would be used on either other household tasks or used to spent more time with children. This is also backed by research done by Koolwal and Van de Walle[5], which finds that reduced travel times to water access improve children’s education rather than paid-market labour participation.
References
- ↑ Graham JP, Hirai M, Kim S-S (2016) An Analysis of Water Collection Labor among Women and Children in 24 Sub-Saharan African Countries. PLoS ONE 11(6): e0155981. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155981
- ↑ Geere, J. A. L., Hunter, P. R., & Jagals, P. (2010). Domestic water carrying and its implications for health: a review and mixed methods pilot study in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Environmental Health, 9(1), 52.
- ↑ Hemson, D. (2007). ‘The toughest of chores’: policy and practice in children collecting water in South Africa. Policy Futures in Education, 5(3), 315-326.
- ↑ Cairncross, S., & Cuff, J. L. (1987). Water use and health in Mueda, Mozambique. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 81(1), 51-54.
- ↑ Koolwal, G., & Van de Walle, D. (2013). Access to water, women’s work, and child outcomes. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 61(2), 369-405.