Embedded Motion Control 2017 Group 5 Meetings Overview: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Team needs to think more on software architecture (components, functions, flows).
Current architecture diagrams are not explicit enough.
Agreed to meet next week to discuss findings and prepare first presentation.
Presentation will be made.
Information flows need to be specified.
Code the corridor challenge in pairs (Sjoerd & Bart, Rodrigo & Kagan, Angel & Torben).
Focus on framework, easier to discuss if we are more specific.
Think carefully on what we need/want to test (some parameters) Simulation vs Real.
Code the corridor challenge separately, in pairs Sjoerd & Bart (world model) , Rodrigo & Kagan (Motion Controller), Angel & Torben (Action Manager).
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
<li>Information flows need to be specified. | <li>Information flows need to be specified. | ||
<li>Code the corridor challenge in pairs (Sjoerd & Bart, Rodrigo & Kagan, Angel & Torben). | <li>Code the corridor challenge in pairs (Sjoerd & Bart, Rodrigo & Kagan, Angel & Torben). | ||
== Meeting 3 (19-5-2017) == | |||
Discussed corridor challenge progress. | |||
<li>Focus on framework, easier to discuss if we are more specific. | |||
<li>Think carefully on what we need/want to test (some parameters) Simulation vs Real. | |||
<li>Code the corridor challenge separately, in pairs Sjoerd & Bart (world model) , Rodrigo & Kagan (Motion Controller), Angel & Torben (Action Manager). | |||
Revision as of 12:58, 30 May 2017
Meeting 1 (12-5-2017)
Reviewed initial concept design with tutor.
Meeting 2 (16-5-2017)
Discussed initial design and prepared presentation.
Meeting 3 (19-5-2017)
Discussed corridor challenge progress.