PRE2015 4 Groep5: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
==Tasks== | ==Tasks== | ||
[ | [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|Logbook]] | ||
==Drive== | ==Drive== |
Revision as of 14:25, 21 April 2016
Seaweed farming
Group members
- Aniceta, N.M.F (0876672)
- Boelsums, N.M (0964376)
- Brandts, A (0895917)
- Haenen, S.R.R (0889428)
- Kuijpers, J.J.L (0838617)
Preliminary brainstorm
Benefits
- Enhances natural water ecosystem
- Various types combats a monoculture
- Cheaper and sustainable food supply
- For livestock (veevoer)
- Decreases the need for deforestation
- For humans
- For livestock (veevoer)
- Descreases the magnitude of waves
- Reduces the CO2/ increases the O2 in the water
- Zee is better than in a basin
- Natural nutrition supply
Proposals
- Floating robot
- Solar panel
- Lowering (anker-style) cutter
- Hard to position,
- Drifts
- “Dijnst[dutch]”
- Rover robot
- Stable polypoid (crab-style)
- Hard to cut above his head
- Swimming robot
- May become struck between the weed
- Perfect mobility and can cut everywhere
Combination of multiple robot’s for every seafruit a suitable robot.
Mariculture
Maritime robotics
Robots for mariculture
Automation
Scaling
Sea farm design
Sea robot prototype
USE: stakeholders and benefits
- Why? => Provide a feasible feedback
- Users: Livestock farmers (veevoer), Foodbuyers
- Enterprise: Seafarmers
- Society: Reduces the shortage of food