PRE2022 3 Group12/Logbook

Approach:

During the project, the prototype will be developed by means of a design process. This process consists of multiple phases. Firstly, the problem will be defined as well as the design goal to solve the problem. Secondly, the functional and technical requirements of the prototype will be specified taking into account time, money and resources. From these requirements, it is possible to create concepts for the design. Next, details will be added to the design and the design will be realized. Lastly, tests will be performed to see if the prototype satisfies the requirements. This process can be summarized in the following steps:

1. Define problem
2. Specify requirements
3. Preliminary design
4. Detailed design
5. Prototyping
6. Testing

Given that the final presentations will be planned in week 8 of the course, this process will have a time period of seven weeks. Therefore, every step is expected to be completed within one week, with the exception of the detailed design since this is the most important and difficult step which will therefore require more time. So the time will be managed as follows, step 1 will be completed in week 1, step 2 in week 2, step 3 in week 3, step 4 in weeks 4 and 5, step 5 in week 6 and step 6 in week 7. In this way, all deliverables are finished in week 8.

Another important aspect of the design process is communication. Therefore, a weekly meeting is scheduled to discuss the progress and task division as well as a weekly work session. The meetings and work sessions will be scheduled on Wednesday from 10:30-11:30 and Monday 11:30-12:30 respectively.

Graphical representation of the steps of the design process.

Week 1

Week 1	Tasks
Abel Brasse	User study, study 5 scientific papers
Linda Geraets	User study, study 5 scientific papers
Luke van Dongen	Card recognition software, study 5 scientific papers
Sander van der Leek	Robot design sketch/model, study 5 scientific papers
Tom van Eemeren	Approach, milestones, deliverables, study 5 scientific papers
Tom van Liempd	Problem statement, study 5 scientific papers

Week 1	Description of work done	Total time
Abel Brasse	Meeting time (3h). Literature search, searching, reading, summarizing papers (5h), User Study (2h)	10
Linda Geraets	Meeting monday (2h), Meeting wednesday (1h), Researching and reading papers (3h 30min), Summarizing papers (3h 30min), User Study (2h)	12h
Sander van der Leek	Monday & Wednesday meetings (3h), Literature search (2h), Reading papers (6h), Summarizing papers and drawing conclusions (2h)	13h
Tom van Liempd	Course Introduction (1h), Meetings (2h), Problem statement (1h 30m), Researching (4h), Reading and summarizing papers (3h)	11.5h
Luke van Dongen	Course Introduction (1h), Meetings (2h), Literature search (1h 30m), Reading Literature (6h), Summarizing literature (3h)	13.5h
Tom van Eemeren	Course introduction(1h), Brainstorming (1h), Prepared agenda (30min), group meeting (1h), literature search (1h), reading literature (6h), summarising literature(1h), added deliverables, approach, milestones and task division to the wiki (2h).	13.5h

Week 2 & Carnival break

Week 2 & Carnival break	Tasks
Abel Brasse	Define three research questions, write two interview questions, suggest card games, user interviews
Linda Geraets	Define three research questions, write two interview questions, suggest card games, problem definition
Luke van Dongen	Define three research questions, write two interview questions, suggest card games, user interviews
Sander van der Leek	Define three research questions, write two interview questions, suggest card games, MoSCoW specifications
Tom van Eemeren	Define three research questions, write two interview questions, suggest card games, user interviews
Tom van Liempd	Define three research questions, write two interview questions, suggest card games, object recognition

Week 2 & Carnival break	Description of work done	Total time
Abel Brasse	Meeting time (1.5h). Preparations before the meeting (2h). Constructing interview questions (2h). Formatting the wikipage (2h)	7.5h
Linda Geraets	Meeting and meeting preparations (6h), Problem definition (2.5h)	8.5h
Sander van der Leek	Meetings (3h), defining functional and more concrete technical MoSCoW tables (4h), editing the wiki (1h)	8h
Tom van Liempd	Meetings (3h), define research questions (0.5h), research computer vision AI (2h), gather and label training data (10h)	15.5h
Luke van Dongen	Meetings (3h), reviewing interview questions (30min), performing user interviews (3h), process user interviews (2h), summarize user interviews (30min)	9h
Tom van Eemeren	Meeting monday (2h), defining research questions, exploring card games (1h), making agenda for meetings (1h), meeting wednesday (1h), constructing interview questions (1h) meeting second wednesday (1h), finalizing interview questions (30 min), updating wiki (1h)	8.5h

Week 3

Week 3	Tasks
Abel Brasse	Improve card-recognition model
Linda Geraets	Literature study how to measure/affect fun in a game
Luke van Dongen	Work on implementing the game of 'pesten' and the computer's strategy & variable difficulty
Sander van der Leek	Work on implementing the game of 'pesten' and the computer's strategy & variable difficulty
Tom van Eemeren	Literature study how to measure/affect fun in a game
Tom van Liempd	Improve card-recognition model

Week 3	Description of work done	Total time
Abel Brasse	Meeting Monday (2h), Meeting Wednesday (1h), Creating and labeling card samples (3.5h), taking interviews and processing them (4)	10.5h
Linda Geraets	Meeting monday (3h), Meeting wednesday (1h), card videos and labeling (4h), User fun (3h)	11h
Sander van der Leek	Monday & Wednesday meetings (4h), working on implementing 'pesten' (10h), researching & implementing difficulty (3h)	17h
Tom van Liempd	Meeting monday (3h), Meeting wednesday (1h), research AI model optimization (1h), training AI model (1h), labelling dataset (5h)	11h
Luke van Dongen	Meeting Monday (1h), Meeting Wednesday (30min), Research "pesten" game strategies (2h), Creating a game of "Pesten" in Python (10h)	13.5h
Tom van Eemeren	Meeting Monday (3h), User interviews (1h), user interview analysis (1h), meeting Wednesday (30min), literature study on measuring user fun (4h), adding affinity diagram and user fun section to the wiki (30 min)	10h

Week 4

Week 4	Tasks
Abel Brasse
Linda Geraets	Work on user fun (decide measurement)
Luke van Dongen	Fine-tuning the score function
Sander van der Leek	Generalise as much game-specific logic as possible
Tom van Eemeren	Finishing affinity diagram and researching data hooking
Tom van Liempd	Research & optimize dataset for better small object detection

Week 4	Description of work done	Total time
Abel Brasse	Meeting Wednesday (1h), rewriting game ruleset + other (1.5h), card labeling (6.5h)	9h
Linda Geraets	Meeting preparation (1h), Wednesday meeting (1h), User fun (8h)	10h
Sander van der Leek	Monday & Wednesday meetings (4h), Moving game-specific logic to the gamestate class (6h), adjusting gamerules (3h)	13h
Tom van Liempd	Monday meeting (2h), wednesday meetings (1h), research (2h), adjusting dataset (5h)	10h
Luke van Dongen	Monday & Wednesday meetings (2h), Checking code made by Sander (1h), Testing and adjusting move_score() function (10h), editing wiki (1h)	14h
Tom van Eemeren	Monday & Wendnesday meetings (4h), Wednesday meeting agenda (30min), affinity diagram (4h), finishing user study (5h), editing wiki layout (30min)	14h

Week 5

Week 5	Tasks
Abel Brasse
Linda Geraets	Do literature study on UI, write text on UI
Sander van der Leek	Rewrite code to accept camera-input
Tom van Liempd	Clean-up dataset, clean-up code and implement camera-input in code
Luke van Dongen
Tom van Eemeren

Week 5	Description of work done	Total time
Abel Brasse
Linda Geraets	Monday & Wednesday meetings (4h), Research and writing UI (6h), Updating Win/Loss ratio (0.5h)	10.5h
Sander van der Leek	Monday & Wednesday meetings (4h), rewrite of entire codebase (6h)	10h
Tom van Liempd	Meetings (3h), cleaning dataset (3h), cleaning up code (4h), implementing camera input (2h)	12h
Luke van Dongen	Monday & Wednesday meetings (2h), Research for suiting GUI extension (1h), Searching for a set of playing card images (1.5h), Implementing GUI (8h), Updating GUI to work in rewritten code (1h)	13.5h
Tom van Eemeren	Meeting Monday (2h), literature search on MCTS (3h), debugging code (1h), implementing determinization (4h), implementing mcts (6h)	16h

Week 6

Week 6	Tasks
Abel Brasse
Linda Geraets
Sander van der Leek	Implement changing difficulty, tune decision-making priorities
Tom van Liempd
Luke van Dongen
Tom van Eemeren

Week 6	Description of work done	Total time
Abel Brasse
Linda Geraets	Meetings (3h), Finishing text UI (30 min), User guide (1.5h), Testing Difficulty (4.5h)	9.5h
Sander van der Leek	Monday & Wednesday meetings (3h), Implementation difficulty-changing after each game (5h), Difficulty tuning (1h)	9h
Tom van Liempd
Luke van Dongen
Tom van Eemeren	Meeting Monday (2h), finishing mcts implementation (5h), meeting Wednesday (1h), Testing mcts(1h), begin on hybrid player (2h)	11h

Week 7

Week 7	Description of work done	Total time
Abel Brasse
Linda Geraets
Sander van der Leek
Tom van Liempd
Luke van Dongen
Tom van Eemeren