Logbook group04: Difference between revisions

From Control Systems Technology Group
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 138: Line 138:
| Kari Luijt || 9.25h || Design recommendation (2.5h), Survey (0.25h), Design recommendation on wiki (2h), (Tutor) meeting (1.75h), Feasibility (2h), Problem statement (.5h), Update wiki (.25h)
| Kari Luijt || 9.25h || Design recommendation (2.5h), Survey (0.25h), Design recommendation on wiki (2h), (Tutor) meeting (1.75h), Feasibility (2h), Problem statement (.5h), Update wiki (.25h)
|-
|-
| Julie van der Hijde  || 6h || Read through design (0.5h), distribute survey (0.5h), (Tutor) meeting (1h), Use (1.5h), Motivation (1h), Ppt (1h), Problem statement (0.5h)
| Julie van der Hijde  || 7h || Read through design (0.5h), distribute survey (0.5h), (Tutor) meeting (1h), Use (2h), Motivation (1h), Ppt (1h), Problem statement (1h)
|-
|-
| Silke Franken || 8.25h || Design recommendation (1.5h), (Tutor) meeting (1h), Chatbot Telegram & meeting prep (2h), ppt template (1.75h), preprossecing data (2h)
| Silke Franken || 8.25h || Design recommendation (1.5h), (Tutor) meeting (1h), Chatbot Telegram & meeting prep (2h), ppt template (1.75h), preprossecing data (2h)

Revision as of 08:38, 7 June 2021

Logbook Group 4

Week 1

Name Time spent Breakdown
Eline Ensinck 12.75 hours Watching pre-recorded lectures (0.5 hours), Q&A session (0.5 hours), Brainstorm session (1.5 hours), Literature studies (4.5 hours), Meeting preparation (0.25 hours), Meeting (1.5 hours), Deliverables (1 hour), Checking text for Wiki (1.25 hours), Mendeley (0.5 hour), State of the Art (1,25 hours)
Ezra Gerris 10 hours Watching pre-recorded lectures (0.5 hours), Q&A session (0.5 hours), Brainstorm session (1.5 hours), Literature studies (4 hours), Meeting (1.5 hours), Writing the Approach + literature study (2 hours)
Kari Luijt 11.75 hours Watching pre-recorded lectures (0.5 hours), Q&A session (0.5 hours), Brainstorm session (1.5 hours), Literature studies (4 hours), Meeting (1.5h), User group (1h) , Subject + User group + Milestones + Checking document (1h 15min), Literatire studies + Problem statement +upload things to wiki (1h 30 min)
Julie van der Hijde 12.25 hours Watching pre-recorded lectures (0.5 hours), Q&A session (0.5 hours), Brainstorm session (1.5 hours), Literature Study (4 hours), Making referencing correct (0.5 h), Meeting (1.5h), Objectives&Problem statement + checking entire doc(2 h), Update Wiki (0.75h), Upload everything on wiki (1h)
Silke Franken 16 hours Watching pre-recorded lectures (0.5 hours), Q&A session (0.5 hours), Brainstorm session (1.5 hours), Literature studies (1 h), learn more about Wikitext / update Wiki (3h 15), Meeting (1.5h), Literature study (7 h), Planning (1 h)

Week 2

Name Time spent Breakdown
Eline Ensinck 14.25 hours Meeting (1h), Investigating AI possibilities (4.5h), Survey (1h), (Tutor) meeting (1.75h), Emails to tutor (0.25h), Reading Grover (1.5h), Literature study (1.5h), Writing State-of-the-art (1.75h), Checking text for Wiki (1h)
Ezra Gerris 11 hours Meeting (1h), Survey questions (0.5h), USE (1.25h), (Tutor) meeting (1.75h), Read Grover (2.5h), (Re)write motivation (2.5h), Checking and updating wiki (1.5h)
Kari Luijt 13.25 hours Meeting (1h), Preparation survey questions (1h), Making survey questions (6h), (Tutor) meeting (1.75h), Making the survey (1.25h), Making the outro (.25h), Read state of the art + motivation for COCO (.5h), Read Grover (1.5h)
Julie van der Hijde 13.75 hours Meeting (1h), USE (1.5h), Wiki (0.5h), Survey questions (1h), (Tutor) meeting (1.75h), Read Grover + notes for future (2.5h), search articles motivation (1.5h), motivation COCO (3h), Checking survey, wiki, motivation, state-of- the-art (1h)
Silke Franken 16.5 hours Meeting (1h), Making survey questions (6.5h), Literature study (1.5h), Read complete plan (0.5h) Design of AI companion (1h), (Tutor) meeting (1.75h), Update planning (15min), writing intro and checking survey (2h), State-of-the-Art (1h), Update Wiki (1h)

Week 3

Name Time spent Breakdown
Eline Ensinck 12.75 hours (Tutor) meeting (1.5h), Boost AI (0.5h), Checking, testing, distributing survey (3h), Literature study design (2h), Meeting (0.75h), Literature study motivation (2.5h), Writing motivation (2.25h), Checking text (0.25h)
Ezra Gerris 9.75 hours (Tutor) meeting (1.5h), Translate informed consent (0.75h), Survey (i.e. translating, distributing, checking, testing) (3h), Meeting (0.75h), Sending mail to Boost AI (0.25h), Literature study motivation and updating wiki (3.5h)
Kari Luijt 10.75 hours (Tutor) meeting (1.5h), Survey (3h), Literature study (1.5h), Meeting (.75h), Text design (2u), Stata do-file (2u)
Julie van der Hijde 9 hours Agenda + update wiki (0.5h), (Tutor) meeting (1.5h), Survey + sending to network (3h), Literature study (4h)
Silke Franken 16.75 hours (Tutor) meeting (2h 15min), survey (3h), design (1h), literature study design (4h), Stata preprocessing do-file (3.5h), Stata do-file (2u), update Wiki (1h)

Week 4

Name Time spent Breakdown
Eline Ensinck 13 hours (Tutor) meeting (1h), Motivation (1,5h), Analysis "Appearance" and "Additional comments" questions (3.75h), Meetings (2.5h), Preparation Stata (1h), Stata Analysis "Appearance" (2.5h), Checking analysis (0.75h)
Ezra Gerris 10 hours (Tutor) meeting (1h), Write sources wiki (0.5h), Analysis "Helpful Tasks" question (2h), Analysis meeting 1 (1.25h), Analysis meeting 2 (1h), Analysis (3h), Updating wiki and motivation (1.25h)
Kari Luijt 12.5 hours (Tutor) meeting (1h), Remove duplicates from data (.5h), Analysis "Interest now" question (2h), Desgin recommendation (.25h), Meeting (1.5h), Meeting (1h), Analysis "Interest now and influence corona"(3.5u), Updating WIKI (2.75h)
Julie van der Hijde 12.5 hours Meeting (.5h), Analysis open questions (3h), Meeting (1.5h), Meeting (1h), data analysis + text + upload to wiki (6.5h)
Silke Franken 13 hours (Tutor) meeting (1h), Survey data preprocessing (1.5h), design recommendation (3h 15min), meeting/stata analysis (2h 15min), Analysis "interest postcorona" open question (2.5h), Analysis "Interest now and influence corona"(2.5u)

Week 5

Name Time spent Breakdown
Eline Ensinck 11.5 hours (Tutor) meeting (1.25h), Dialogflow (0.25h), Updating & checking analysis (3.25h), Stata Analysis "Privacy" (4.25h), Meeting (2.5h)
Ezra Gerris 11.5 hours (Tutor) meeting (1.25h), Update Stata analysis and wiki (5h), Add figure labels to Wiki (1.5h), Update wiki with open questions and survey part (1.25h), Meeting(2.5h)
Kari Luijt 12.75 hours (Tutor) meeting (1.25h), Paper Emilia (1h), Update design info + Update wiki (1.75h), Design research and writing (5.25h), Meeting(2.5h), Fix and upload do-file (1h)
Julie van der Hijde 10.5 hours (Tutor) meeting (1.25h), Stata Analysis + Saving+upload images & wiki(3.5h), Meeting(2.5h), Text + Wiki (3.25h)
Silke Franken 13.25 hours (Tutor) meeting (2h), paper chaves&gerosa (1h 30min), design research and writing (7u), Meeting(2.5h) Email exchange (15min)

Week 6

Name Time spent Breakdown
Eline Ensinck 14.75 hours Literature study (1.5h), AI Applications text (3h), Meeting (1h), Survey 2 (1.5h), Design (0.5h), Analysis (0.5h), Meeting (1.75h), Translating, checking & discussing survey 2 (5h)
Ezra Gerris 15 hours Meeting (1h), Set up survey 2 (2.25h), Update wiki (2.5h), Design (0.5h), Meeting (1.75h), Survey: developing questions regarding paper Pelau et al., translating, checking (7h)
Kari Luijt 14.5 hours Meeting (1h), Survey 2 (2.75h), Design recommendation (6h), Meeting (1.75h), Survey 2 (3h)
Julie van der Hijde 13.75 hours Meeting (1h), Motivation Coco + wiki (4h), Survey 2 & design (1h), Meeting (1.75h), Intro and informed consent (2h), Survey 2 checking and discussing (4h)
Silke Franken 21.5 hours Design recommendation (3.5h), Meeting (1h), Survey 2 (7h), application design (5h), Meeting (1.75h) Go through survey, checking/translating (3h 15min)

Week 7

Name Time spent Breakdown
Eline Ensinck 9.5h Design (0.75h), Distributing survey (1.25h), Email (0.25h), USE (1.75h), Chatbot (1.5h), (Tutor) meeting (1.75h), Ppt (0.5h), Feasibility (1.75h)
Ezra Gerris 5.75h Read through design (0.5h), Update wiki with indications/conclusions and open questions interest (1.25h), Survey (0.5h), (Tutor) meeting (1.75h), Feasibility (1.5h), PPT (0.25h)
Kari Luijt 9.25h Design recommendation (2.5h), Survey (0.25h), Design recommendation on wiki (2h), (Tutor) meeting (1.75h), Feasibility (2h), Problem statement (.5h), Update wiki (.25h)
Julie van der Hijde 7h Read through design (0.5h), distribute survey (0.5h), (Tutor) meeting (1h), Use (2h), Motivation (1h), Ppt (1h), Problem statement (1h)
Silke Franken 8.25h Design recommendation (1.5h), (Tutor) meeting (1h), Chatbot Telegram & meeting prep (2h), ppt template (1.75h), preprossecing data (2h)

Week 8

Name Time spent Breakdown
Eline Ensinck
Ezra Gerris
Kari Luijt
Julie van der Hijde
Silke Franken

Week 9

Name Time spent Breakdown
Eline Ensinck
Ezra Gerris
Kari Luijt
Julie van der Hijde
Silke Franken