PRE2020 4 Group3: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 292: | Line 292: | ||
1.5h, 03/05/21, Interview second stakeholder | 1.5h, 03/05/21, Interview second stakeholder | ||
2h, 05/05/21, Work out model using interview data | |||
________________ | ________________ | ||
Total: | Total: 14.5 hours | ||
Revision as of 13:02, 5 May 2021
Group members
Name | Student number |
---|---|
Eline Boom | 1465872 |
Luuk van Dorst | 1469789 |
Robin van de Hoef | 1479679 |
Kyra Moviat | 1349171 |
Jeroen Pullen | 1477730 |
Veerle Uhl | 1462229 |
Interactive software learning children how to draw, count and recognize colors. Children will get small tasks like "draw 3 red apples", the software will recognize the extent to which this task is done correctly and provide compliments and or suggested improvements.
Plan
Subjects: Child psychology, learning, image processing, software development.
Objectives: Create software to help children learn
Users: Children (of parents that want to provide a playful learning app)
State-of-the art: Alternative apps that help children either count, draw or learn colors individually. Not in a combined way, we feel the combination might improve the way to learn these things. Additionally, we hypothesize that explaining problems via a childs own drawn elements could improve their understanding.
Approach: Make up a model for how the software should work, make software in which one can draw, program software that can recognize multiple drawn objects/shapes, implement everything in a working framework according to the model.
Planning:
Investigate literature in week 2 & 3
Software model in week 2 & 3
Drawing software in week 3 & 4
Object recognition software in week 5 & 6
Implement recognition software in framework in week 7 & 8
Work on wiki and presentation during week 2-8
Milestones: Drawing software, Working object recognition, implementation in task framework
Deliverables: Peer review, Wiki, Final Presentation, The software (?)
Who will do what: yet to be determined
Research
How children learn
From birth to around age 5, children develop "everyday mathematics". These are informal ideas of more and less, taking away, shapes and sizes. These everyday mathematics can be surprisingly broad, complex and sophisticated. The everyday mathematics can develop in interesting ways, without adult assistance.
From the age of 2 or so, children learn the language and grammar of counting. They memorize the first ten or so counting words, and then learn a set of rules to generate the higher numbers. When children are around 4 or 5 yeras old, they begin to develop metacognitive skills: They become increasingly aware of their own thinking and begin to express it in words. The hardest form of language for children to learn is the special written symbolism of mathematics, like 5, +, - or =.
Understanding numbers involves more than saying a few counting words. It involves reasoning about numbers, making inferences and developing a mental number line. Children also need to mathematize; to concieve of problems in explicitely mathematical terms. They need to understand that the action of combining one bear with two others can be meaningfully interpreted in the terms of the mathematical principles of addition and the symbolism 1 + 2.
There are different curricula possible with different ways to learn children of all ages to count. Examples are in the drive.
Tasks
Eline Boom
Week | Tasks | Number of hours |
---|---|---|
1 | Example | Example |
2 | Example | Example |
3 | Example | Example |
4 | Example | Example |
5 | Example | Example |
6 | Example | Example |
7 | Example | Example |
8 | Example | Example |
Luuk van Dorst
Week | Tasks | Number of hours |
---|---|---|
1 | Example | Example |
2 | Example | Example |
3 | Example | Example |
4 | Example | Example |
5 | Example | Example |
6 | Example | Example |
7 | Example | Example |
8 | Example | Example |
Robin van de Hoef
Week | Tasks | Number of hours |
---|---|---|
1 | Example | Example |
2 | Example | Example |
3 | Example | Example |
4 | Example | Example |
5 | Example | Example |
6 | Example | Example |
7 | Example | Example |
8 | Example | Example |
Kyra Moviat
Week | Tasks | Number of hours |
---|---|---|
1 | Example | Example |
2 | Example | Example |
3 | Example | Example |
4 | Example | Example |
5 | Example | Example |
6 | Example | Example |
7 | Example | Example |
8 | Example | Example |
Jeroen Pullen
Week | Tasks | Number of hours |
---|---|---|
1 | Research ideas and brainstorm for project | 2 |
2 | Prepare project planning, contact and meet with stakeholders | 7 |
3 | Meet with stakeholders, plan out product model and update wiki | Example |
4 | Example | Example |
5 | Example | Example |
6 | Example | Example |
7 | Example | Example |
8 | Example | Example |
Veerle Uhl
Week | Tasks | Number of hours |
---|---|---|
1 | Example | Example |
2 | Example | Example |
3 | Example | Example |
4 | Example | Example |
5 | Example | Example |
6 | Example | Example |
7 | Example | Example |
8 | Example | Example |
Time Log
Name, Total, Breakdown
Eline Boom
1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting
0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting
1h, 03/05/21, Meeting
________________
Total:
Luuk van Dorst
1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting
0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting
2h, 29/04/21, Searching for viable datasets
3h, 30/04/21, researching neural networks
4h, 02/05/21, making a prototype neural network
1h, 03/05/21, Meeting
________________
Total: 10,5
Kyra Moviat
1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting
0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting
1h,03/05/21, Meeting ________________
Total:
Robin van de Hoef
1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting
0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting
1h, 03/05/21, Meeting
________________
Total:
Jeroen Pullen
1h, 21/04/21, Research project ideas
1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting
1h, 26/04/21, Prepare poject planning
1h, 27/04/21, Research state of the art
1h, 28/04/21, Updating Wiki
1h, 29/04/21, Contacting stakeholders
0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting
1h, 29/04/21, Preparing stakeholder questions
1.5h, 30/04/21, Interview first stakeholder
1h, 03/05/21, Meeting
1h, 03/05/21, Prepare second stakeholder meeting
1.5h, 03/05/21, Interview second stakeholder
2h, 05/05/21, Work out model using interview data ________________
Total: 14.5 hours
Veerle Uhl
1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting
0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting
1.5 h 29/04/21, literary research
1 h 30/04/21, literary research
1 h, 03/05/21, Meeting
1.5 h, 03/05/21, Literary research on how children learn
________________
Total: 6,5 hours