PRE2020 4 Group3: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 204: | Line 204: | ||
0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting | 0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting | ||
1h, 03/05/21, Meeting | |||
________________ | ________________ | ||
Line 221: | Line 222: | ||
4h, 02/05/21, making a prototype neural network | 4h, 02/05/21, making a prototype neural network | ||
1h, 03/05/21, Meeting | |||
________________ | ________________ | ||
Line 233: | Line 236: | ||
0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting | 0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting | ||
1h,03/05/21, Meeting | |||
________________ | ________________ | ||
Line 245: | Line 248: | ||
0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting | 0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting | ||
1h, 03/05/21, Meeting | |||
________________ | ________________ | ||
Line 271: | Line 274: | ||
1.5h, 30/04/21, Interview first stakeholder | 1.5h, 30/04/21, Interview first stakeholder | ||
1h, 03/05/21, Meeting | |||
________________ | ________________ | ||
Line 287: | Line 292: | ||
1 h 30/04/21, literary research | 1 h 30/04/21, literary research | ||
1h, 03/05/21, Meeting | |||
________________ | ________________ | ||
Total: | Total: |
Revision as of 08:47, 3 May 2021
Group members
Name | Student number |
---|---|
Eline Boom | 1465872 |
Luuk van Dorst | 1469789 |
Robin van de Hoef | 1479679 |
Kyra Moviat | 1349171 |
Jeroen Pullen | 1477730 |
Veerle Uhl | 1462229 |
Interactive software learning children how to draw, count and recognize colors. Children will get small tasks like "draw 3 red apples", the software will recognize the extent to which this task is done correctly and provide compliments and or suggested improvements.
Plan
Subjects: Child psychology, learning, image processing, software development.
Objectives: Create software to help children learn
Users: Children (of parents that want to provide a playful learning app)
State-of-the art: Alternative apps that help children either count, draw or learn colors individually. Not in a combined way, we feel the combination might improve the way to learn these things. Additionally, we hypothesize that explaining problems via a childs own drawn elements could improve their understanding.
Approach: Make up a model for how the software should work, make software in which one can draw, program software that can recognize multiple drawn objects/shapes, implement everything in a working framework according to the model.
Planning:
Investigate literature in week 2 & 3
Software model in week 2 & 3
Drawing software in week 3 & 4
Object recognition software in week 5 & 6
Implement recognition software in framework in week 7 & 8
Work on wiki and presentation during week 2-8
Milestones: Drawing software, Working object recognition, implementation in task framework
Deliverables: Peer review, Wiki, Final Presentation, The software (?)
Who will do what: yet to be determined
Tasks
Eline Boom
Week | Tasks | Number of hours |
---|---|---|
1 | Example | Example |
2 | Example | Example |
3 | Example | Example |
4 | Example | Example |
5 | Example | Example |
6 | Example | Example |
7 | Example | Example |
8 | Example | Example |
Luuk van Dorst
Week | Tasks | Number of hours |
---|---|---|
1 | Example | Example |
2 | Example | Example |
3 | Example | Example |
4 | Example | Example |
5 | Example | Example |
6 | Example | Example |
7 | Example | Example |
8 | Example | Example |
Robin van de Hoef
Week | Tasks | Number of hours |
---|---|---|
1 | Example | Example |
2 | Example | Example |
3 | Example | Example |
4 | Example | Example |
5 | Example | Example |
6 | Example | Example |
7 | Example | Example |
8 | Example | Example |
Kyra Moviat
Week | Tasks | Number of hours |
---|---|---|
1 | Example | Example |
2 | Example | Example |
3 | Example | Example |
4 | Example | Example |
5 | Example | Example |
6 | Example | Example |
7 | Example | Example |
8 | Example | Example |
Jeroen Pullen
Week | Tasks | Number of hours |
---|---|---|
1 | Example | Example |
2 | Example | Example |
3 | Example | Example |
4 | Example | Example |
5 | Example | Example |
6 | Example | Example |
7 | Example | Example |
8 | Example | Example |
Veerle Uhl
Week | Tasks | Number of hours |
---|---|---|
1 | Example | Example |
2 | Example | Example |
3 | Example | Example |
4 | Example | Example |
5 | Example | Example |
6 | Example | Example |
7 | Example | Example |
8 | Example | Example |
Time Log
Name, Total, Breakdown
Eline Boom
1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting
0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting
1h, 03/05/21, Meeting
________________
Total:
Luuk van Dorst
1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting
0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting
2h, 29/04/21, Searching for viable datasets
3h, 30/04/21, researching neural networks
4h, 02/05/21, making a prototype neural network
1h, 03/05/21, Meeting
________________
Total: 10,5
Kyra Moviat
1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting
0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting
1h,03/05/21, Meeting ________________
Total:
Robin van de Hoef
1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting
0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting
1h, 03/05/21, Meeting
________________
Total:
Jeroen Pullen
1h, 21/04/21, Research project ideas
1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting
1h, 26/04/21, Prepare poject planning
1h, 27/04/21, Research state of the art
1h, 28/04/21, Updating Wiki
1h, 29/04/21, Contacting stakeholders
0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting
1h, 29/04/21, Preparing stakeholder questions
1.5h, 30/04/21, Interview first stakeholder
1h, 03/05/21, Meeting
________________
Total: 9 hours
Veerle Uhl
1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting
0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting
1.5 h 29/04/21, literary research
1 h 30/04/21, literary research
1h, 03/05/21, Meeting
________________
Total: