PRE2019 3 Group8: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
=== State-of-the-Art === | === State-of-the-Art === | ||
1. Thalluri, J., O'Flaherty, J.A., and Shepherd, P.L., (2014). Classmate peer-coaching: "A Study Buddy Support scheme" | |||
: In this article blablable | |||
2. volgende artikel | |||
Revision as of 13:41, 6 February 2020
Abstract
Our ideas are:
- a study buddy to help you motivate and/or concentrate
- an app to reserve a seat in the train
- an app to see which seats are used in TU/e buildings.
Each group has plan ready after Week 1, Plan contains:
- subject,
- objectives,
- users,
- state-of-the-art,
- approach,
- planning,
- milestones,
- deliverables,
- who will do what
Group Members
| Name | Study | Student ID |
|---|---|---|
| Teis Arets | Psychology & Technology | 1261991 |
| Tom Bergmans | Psychology & Technology and Electrical Engineering | 1253565 |
| Nynke Boonstra | Psychology & Technology | 1251155 |
| Bob Hofstede | Psychology & Technology | 0950282 |
| Emile Merle | Computer Science | 1244746 |
Planning
The planning is EMPTY
Introduction
Considering that our plan and idea is
State-of-the-Art
1. Thalluri, J., O'Flaherty, J.A., and Shepherd, P.L., (2014). Classmate peer-coaching: "A Study Buddy Support scheme"
- In this article blablable
2. volgende artikel