PRE2018 4 Group9: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==Problem statement== | ==Problem statement== | ||
The amount of collisions between satellites and space debris increases exponentially, due to the growing amount of space debris. | The amount of collisions between satellites and space debris increases exponentially, due to the growing amount of space debris.<br /> | ||
Chance that a satellite collides with a piece of debris bigger than 1 cm in a year: | Chance that a satellite collides with a piece of debris bigger than 1 cm in a year:<br /> | ||
2007: 17-20%, 2010: 50% | 2007: 17-20%, 2010: 50%<br /> | ||
Consequences: no internet, no gps, costs a lot of money, space travel may become more difficult/impossible | Consequences: no internet, no gps, costs a lot of money, space travel may become more difficult/impossible<br /> | ||
==Objectives== | ==Objectives== | ||
Analyzing the available methods to remove space debris | Analyzing the available methods to remove space debris <br /> | ||
Find methods on how to prevent new space debris (governance) | Find methods on how to prevent new space debris (governance)<br /> | ||
Further develop a promising method | Further develop a promising method<br /> | ||
==Users and their requirements== | ==Users and their requirements== | ||
Users: | Users:<br /> | ||
Satellite owners (governments, space associations) | Satellite owners (governments, space associations)<br /> | ||
Requirements: | Requirements: | ||
re-usable | re-usable <br /> | ||
quick to implement | quick to implement<br /> | ||
hard to abuse | hard to abuse<br /> | ||
versatile (for both smaller and larger debris) | versatile (for both smaller and larger debris)<br /> | ||
autonomous | autonomous<br /> | ||
durable | durable<br /> | ||
affordable | affordable<br /> | ||
==Approach, milestone and deliverables== | ==Approach, milestone and deliverables== | ||
Approach: | Approach:<br /> | ||
Reading papers to get a good picture of the current problem and the state-of-the-art technology | Reading papers to get a good picture of the current problem and the state-of-the-art technology<br /> | ||
Analyzing and comparing possible methods for space debris removal by looking at their pros and cons | Analyzing and comparing possible methods for space debris removal by looking at their pros and cons<br /> | ||
Further development of a (combination of) promising technique(s) with a model or prototype. | Further development of a (combination of) promising technique(s) with a model or prototype.<br /> | ||
Milestones: | Milestones: | ||
week 2 | week 2<br /> | ||
determined subject | determined subject<br /> | ||
defined plan | defined plan<br /> | ||
week 3 | week 3<br /> | ||
find state of the art methods | find state of the art methods<br /> | ||
finished literature search | finished literature search<br /> | ||
week 4 | week 4<br /> | ||
determine promising method(s) | determine promising method(s)<br /> | ||
week 5 | week 5<br /> | ||
basic model | basic model<br /> | ||
week 6 | week 6<br /> | ||
final model | final model<br /> | ||
week 7 | week 7<br /> | ||
results model | results model<br /> | ||
implement model in USE | implement model in USE<br /> | ||
finalized wiki | finalized wiki<br /> | ||
week 8 | week 8<br /> | ||
presentation | presentation<br /> | ||
Deliverables | Deliverables<br /> | ||
Wiki page | Wiki page<br /> | ||
Presentation | Presentation<br /> | ||
Model/prototype | Model/prototype<br /> | ||
==Who is doing what?== | ==Who is doing what?== | ||
Literature study All | Literature study All<br /> | ||
Literature analysis All | Literature analysis All<br /> | ||
Modelling Rob/Ilja/Sara | Modelling Rob/Ilja/Sara<br /> | ||
Prototyping Rob/Ilja/Sara | Prototyping Rob/Ilja/Sara<br /> | ||
Updating wiki All | Updating wiki All<br /> | ||
Implementation USE Joris/Thomas | Implementation USE Joris/Thomas <br /> | ||
Visualizing data/results Joris/Thomas | Visualizing data/results Joris/Thomas<br /> | ||
Presentation Joris/Thomas | Presentation Joris/Thomas<br /> | ||
Revision as of 11:55, 4 May 2019
Group members
Rob de Mooij 1017797 Ilja van Oort 1001232 Sara Tjon 1247050 Thomas Pilaet 0999458 Joris Zandeberge 1231962
Problem statement
The amount of collisions between satellites and space debris increases exponentially, due to the growing amount of space debris.
Chance that a satellite collides with a piece of debris bigger than 1 cm in a year:
2007: 17-20%, 2010: 50%
Consequences: no internet, no gps, costs a lot of money, space travel may become more difficult/impossible
Objectives
Analyzing the available methods to remove space debris
Find methods on how to prevent new space debris (governance)
Further develop a promising method
Users and their requirements
Users:
Satellite owners (governments, space associations)
Requirements:
re-usable
quick to implement
hard to abuse
versatile (for both smaller and larger debris)
autonomous
durable
affordable
Approach, milestone and deliverables
Approach:
Reading papers to get a good picture of the current problem and the state-of-the-art technology
Analyzing and comparing possible methods for space debris removal by looking at their pros and cons
Further development of a (combination of) promising technique(s) with a model or prototype.
Milestones:
week 2
determined subject
defined plan
week 3
find state of the art methods
finished literature search
week 4
determine promising method(s)
week 5
basic model
week 6
final model
week 7
results model
implement model in USE
finalized wiki
week 8
presentation
Deliverables
Wiki page
Presentation
Model/prototype
Who is doing what?
Literature study All
Literature analysis All
Modelling Rob/Ilja/Sara
Prototyping Rob/Ilja/Sara
Updating wiki All
Implementation USE Joris/Thomas
Visualizing data/results Joris/Thomas
Presentation Joris/Thomas