PRE2018 4 Group9: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Thomas Pilaet 0999458 | Thomas Pilaet 0999458 | ||
Joris Zandeberge 1231962 | Joris Zandeberge 1231962 | ||
==Problem statement== | |||
The amount of collisions between satellites and space debris increases exponentially, due to the growing amount of space debris. | |||
Chance that a satellite collides with a piece of debris bigger than 1 cm in a year: | |||
2007: 17-20%, 2010: 50% | |||
Consequences: no internet, no gps, costs a lot of money, space travel may become more difficult/impossible | |||
==Objectives== | |||
Analyzing the available methods to remove space debris | |||
Find methods on how to prevent new space debris (governance) | |||
Further develop a promising method | |||
==Users and their requirements== | |||
Users: | |||
Satellite owners (governments, space associations) | |||
Requirements: | |||
re-usable | |||
quick to implement | |||
hard to abuse | |||
versatile (for both smaller and larger debris) | |||
autonomous | |||
durable | |||
affordable | |||
==Approach, milestone and deliverables== | |||
Approach: | |||
Reading papers to get a good picture of the current problem and the state-of-the-art technology | |||
Analyzing and comparing possible methods for space debris removal by looking at their pros and cons | |||
Further development of a (combination of) promising technique(s) with a model or prototype. | |||
Milestones: | |||
week 2 | |||
determined subject | |||
defined plan | |||
week 3 | |||
find state of the art methods | |||
finished literature search | |||
week 4 | |||
determine promising method(s) | |||
week 5 | |||
basic model | |||
week 6 | |||
final model | |||
week 7 | |||
results model | |||
implement model in USE | |||
finalized wiki | |||
week 8 | |||
presentation | |||
Deliverables | |||
Wiki page | |||
Presentation | |||
Model/prototype | |||
==Who is doing what?== | |||
Literature study All | |||
Literature analysis All | |||
Modelling Rob/Ilja/Sara | |||
Prototyping Rob/Ilja/Sara | |||
Updating wiki All | |||
Implementation USE Joris/Thomas | |||
Visualizing data/results Joris/Thomas | |||
Presentation Joris/Thomas |
Revision as of 11:54, 4 May 2019
Group members
Rob de Mooij 1017797 Ilja van Oort 1001232 Sara Tjon 1247050 Thomas Pilaet 0999458 Joris Zandeberge 1231962
Problem statement
The amount of collisions between satellites and space debris increases exponentially, due to the growing amount of space debris. Chance that a satellite collides with a piece of debris bigger than 1 cm in a year: 2007: 17-20%, 2010: 50% Consequences: no internet, no gps, costs a lot of money, space travel may become more difficult/impossible
Objectives
Analyzing the available methods to remove space debris Find methods on how to prevent new space debris (governance) Further develop a promising method
Users and their requirements
Users: Satellite owners (governments, space associations)
Requirements: re-usable quick to implement hard to abuse versatile (for both smaller and larger debris) autonomous durable affordable
Approach, milestone and deliverables
Approach: Reading papers to get a good picture of the current problem and the state-of-the-art technology Analyzing and comparing possible methods for space debris removal by looking at their pros and cons Further development of a (combination of) promising technique(s) with a model or prototype.
Milestones: week 2 determined subject defined plan week 3 find state of the art methods finished literature search week 4 determine promising method(s) week 5 basic model week 6 final model week 7 results model implement model in USE finalized wiki week 8 presentation
Deliverables Wiki page Presentation Model/prototype
Who is doing what?
Literature study All Literature analysis All Modelling Rob/Ilja/Sara Prototyping Rob/Ilja/Sara Updating wiki All Implementation USE Joris/Thomas Visualizing data/results Joris/Thomas Presentation Joris/Thomas