|
|
(33 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| = Planning =
| |
|
| |
|
| == Week 5 ==
| |
| Making individual planning
| |
|
| |
| Task environment description
| |
|
| |
| Finalising user requirements through proxemics + privacy issues (partially completed already)
| |
|
| |
| Investigating if dynamic window approach is still viable, if so try to understand how it works and how it can possibly be extended for this application
| |
|
| |
| == Week 6 ==
| |
|
| |
| Looking at viability of Social Force Model and SLAM, are they a better than DWA?
| |
|
| |
| Identifying ways to combine these approaches
| |
|
| |
| (Finding a way to distinguish between humans and static objects)
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| == Week 7 ==
| |
|
| |
| Describing the ‘best’ collision avoidance procedure
| |
|
| |
| (Performing simulations with this procedure?)
| |
|
| |
| Discussion of benefits and disadvantages for this approach
| |
|
| |
| Topics for further research
| |
|
| |
| Working on final presentation
| |
|
| |
| =Topic=
| |
| User-centred design of a collision avoidance procedure for robots in supermarket environments
| |
|
| |
| =Introduction & Problem statement=
| |
|
| |
| Robot navigation and collision avoidance in crowded and dynamic environments is a challenging problem, not only from a technical point of view, but also when looking at how robots should behave in the proximity of (large numbers of) people.
| |
|
| |
| This research will focus on finding a solution for robot collision avoidance in a supermarket environment. A supermarket environment has aspects that make it unique from other crowded environments. To make this more concise, a description of this environment is given with advantages and difficulties for designing a robot collision avoidance. Furthermore, it will also become clear that users (staff & customers) will have certain requirements that relate to human robot interactions (HRI). Keeping both the environment and customer requirements in mind, state-of-the art collision avoidance procedures will be assessed on application in a supermarket environment and possible additions to enhance them for this application will be investigated. A simulation with a candidate object avoidance procedure will be done to test its working potential. Finally, advantages and disadvantages for this candidate procedure are given and topics for further research will be presented.
| |