From Control Systems Technology Group
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
|
| (36 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| = Planning =
| |
|
| |
|
| == Week 5 ==
| |
| Making individual planning
| |
|
| |
| Task environment description
| |
|
| |
| Finalising user requirements through proxemics + privacy issues (partially completed already)
| |
|
| |
| Investigating if dynamic window approach is still viable, if so try to understand how it works and how it can possibly be extended for this application
| |
|
| |
| == Week 6 ==
| |
|
| |
| Looking at viability of Social Force Model and SLAM, are they a better than DWA?
| |
|
| |
| Identifying ways to combine these approaches
| |
|
| |
| (Finding a way to distinguish between humans and static objects)
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| == Week 7 ==
| |
|
| |
| Describing the ‘best’ collision avoidance procedure
| |
|
| |
| (Performing simulations with this procedure?)
| |
|
| |
| Discussion of benefits and disadvantages for this approach
| |
|
| |
| Topics for further research
| |
|
| |
| Working on final presentation
| |
|
| |
| =Topic=
| |
Latest revision as of 14:59, 14 October 2018