PRE2015 3 Groep2 log martijn: Difference between revisions
(→Week 3) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*Redefining Research | *Redefining Research | ||
*Research Personal Space by E. Torta --> See Research, week 3 (together with Jeroen) | *Research Personal Space by E. Torta --> See Research, week 3 (together with Jeroen) | ||
Problems: | |||
This week we together looked at the drone together and tried to make it fly. Also we looked at the feedback we got after out last presentation regarding our project. One of these feedback points was about other groups of previous years that had done projects with similar subjects. | |||
One project however seemed to look like a little too much like the plans we had in mind, forcing us to adjust the aim of our project. They were using the same drone, the same software to fly it and even thought of the same method for verification of the customer (NFC tag). We had two choices, either continue where the other group left off or research a different aspect of the subject. Considering we have only 2 people from ICT, 1 electrical engineer and 3 people from WTB with little programming experience, choosing the first option seemed unwise. | |||
Thus we moved our focus to the part of flying the drone as in finding a good landing spot. Also we decided to research the approaching of people by drones, since no research we were able to find did look at that for drones yet. | |||
Revision as of 19:41, 28 February 2016
Week 1
Week 2
Next to the meeting we had together I focused on research concerning the laws for drones, with the focus on where can we fly and privacy. The results can be found under 'Legalisation' on the 'week 2' page.
Week 3
- Meeting
- First look into other projects at home
- Wednesday entire morning researching the drone. What do we have and how does fly? Also what software is available? (also see Problems)
- Redefining Research
- Research Personal Space by E. Torta --> See Research, week 3 (together with Jeroen)
Problems: This week we together looked at the drone together and tried to make it fly. Also we looked at the feedback we got after out last presentation regarding our project. One of these feedback points was about other groups of previous years that had done projects with similar subjects.
One project however seemed to look like a little too much like the plans we had in mind, forcing us to adjust the aim of our project. They were using the same drone, the same software to fly it and even thought of the same method for verification of the customer (NFC tag). We had two choices, either continue where the other group left off or research a different aspect of the subject. Considering we have only 2 people from ICT, 1 electrical engineer and 3 people from WTB with little programming experience, choosing the first option seemed unwise.
Thus we moved our focus to the part of flying the drone as in finding a good landing spot. Also we decided to research the approaching of people by drones, since no research we were able to find did look at that for drones yet.