Related Literature Group 4, design: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
===References=== | ===References=== | ||
</ | <references/> | ||
Revision as of 18:59, 9 May 2021
Gender
- Females chose to gender-match and to interact with a more realistic VA. Males exhibited little preference for either gender, and a greater preference than females for realistic VAs. Thus, where it is not feasible to gender-match in SSCO, the recommendation is to implement a realistic female VA [1]
References
- ↑ Payne, J., Szymkowiak, A., Robertson, P., & Johnson, G. (2013). Gendering the machine: Preferred virtual assistant gender and realism in self-service. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 8108 LNAI, 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40415-3_9