PRE2020 4 Group3: Difference between revisions
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
'''Eline Boom''' | '''Eline Boom''' | ||
1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting | |||
0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting | |||
(...) | (...) | ||
________________ | ________________ | ||
Line 51: | Line 54: | ||
'''Luuk van Dorst''' | '''Luuk van Dorst''' | ||
1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting | |||
0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting | |||
(...) | (...) | ||
________________ | ________________ | ||
Line 60: | Line 66: | ||
'''Kyra Moviat''' | '''Kyra Moviat''' | ||
1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting | |||
0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting | |||
(...) | (...) | ||
________________ | ________________ | ||
Line 69: | Line 78: | ||
'''Robin van de Hoef''' | '''Robin van de Hoef''' | ||
1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting | |||
0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting | |||
(...) | (...) | ||
Line 101: | Line 114: | ||
'''Veerle Uhl''' | '''Veerle Uhl''' | ||
1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting | |||
0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting | |||
(...) | (...) | ||
________________ | ________________ | ||
Total: | Total: |
Revision as of 14:34, 29 April 2021
Group members: Eline Boom 1465872, Luuk van Dorst 1469789, Robin van de Hoef 1479679, Kyra Moviat 1349171, Jeroen Pullen 1477730, Veerle Uhl 1462229 Interested in creating a software / theoretical solution.
Interactive software learning children how to draw, count and recognize colors. Children will get small tasks like "draw 3 red apples", the software will recognize the extent to which this task is done correctly and provide compliments and or suggested improvements.
Plan
Subjects: Child psychology, learning, image processing, software development.
Objectives: Create software to help children learn
Users: Children (of parents that want to provide a playful learning app)
State-of-the art: Alternative apps that help children either count, draw or learn colors individually. Not in a combined way, we feel the combination might improve the way to learn these things. Additionally, we hypothesize that explaining problems via a childs own drawn elements could improve their understanding.
Approach: Make up a model for how the software should work, make software in which one can draw, program software that can recognize multiple drawn objects/shapes, implement everything in a working framework according to the model.
Planning:
Investigate literature in week 2 & 3
Software model in week 2 & 3
Drawing software in week 3 & 4
Object recognition software in week 5 & 6
Implement recognition software in framework in week 7 & 8
Work on wiki and presentation during week 2-8
Milestones: Drawing software, Working object recognition, implementation in task framework
Deliverables: Peer review, Wiki, Final Presentation, The software (?)
Who will do what: yet to be determined
Journal
Name, Total, Breakdown
Eline Boom
1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting
0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting
(...) ________________
Total:
Luuk van Dorst
1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting
0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting
(...) ________________
Total:
Kyra Moviat
1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting
0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting
(...) ________________
Total:
Robin van de Hoef
1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting
0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting
(...)
________________
Total:
Jeroen Pullen
1h, 21/04/21, Research project ideas
1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting
1h, 26/04/21, Prepare poject planning
1h, 27/04/21, Research state of the art
1h, 28/04/21, Updating Wiki
1h, 29/04/21, Contacting stakeholders
0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting
1h, 29/04/21, Preparing stakeholder questions
________________
Total: 6.5 hours
Veerle Uhl
1h, 22/04/21, Brainstorm meeting
0.5h, 29/04/21, Meeting
(...) ________________
Total: