PRE2020 4 Group3: Difference between revisions
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
(...) | (...) | ||
________________ | ________________ | ||
Line 53: | Line 54: | ||
(...) | (...) | ||
________________ | ________________ | ||
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
(...) | (...) | ||
________________ | ________________ | ||
Line 71: | Line 70: | ||
(...) | (...) | ||
________________ | ________________ | ||
Line 101: | Line 99: | ||
(...) | (...) | ||
________________ | ________________ | ||
Total: | Total: |
Revision as of 10:12, 29 April 2021
Group members: Eline Boom 1465872, Luuk van Dorst 1469789, Kyra Moviat 1349171, Jeroen Pullen 1477730, Veerle Uhl 1462229, Robin van de Hoef 1479679
Interested in creating a software / theoretical solution.
Interactive software learning children how to draw, count and recognize colors. Children will get small tasks like "draw 3 red apples", the software will recognize the extent to which this task is done correctly and provide compliments and or suggested improvements.
Plan
Subjects: Child psychology, learning, image processing, software development.
Objectives: Create software to help children learn
Users: Children (of parents that want to provide a playful learning app)
State-of-the art: Alternative apps that help children either count, draw or learn colors individually. Not in a combined way, we feel the combination might improve the way to learn these things. Additionally, we hypothesize that explaining problems via a childs own drawn elements could improve their understanding.
Approach: Make up a model for how the software should work, make software in which one can draw, program software that can recognize multiple drawn objects/shapes, implement everything in a working framework according to the model.
Planning:
Investigate literature in week 2 & 3
Software model in week 2 & 3
Drawing software in week 3 & 4
Object recognition software in week 5 & 6
Implement recognition software in framework in week 7 & 8
Work on wiki and presentation during week 2-8
Milestones: Drawing software, Working object recognition, implementation in task framework
Deliverables: Peer review, Wiki, Final Presentation, The software (?)
Who will do what: yet to be determined
Journal
Name, Total, Breakdown
Eline Boom
(...)
________________
Total:
Luuk van Dorst
(...) ________________
Total:
Kyra Moviat
(...) ________________
Total:
Robin van de Hoef
(...) ________________
Total:
Jeroen Pullen
1h, Research project ideas
1h, Meeting
1h, Prepare poject planning
1h, Research State of the art
1h, Updating Wiki
1h, Meeting
1h, Contacting Stakeholders
________________
Total: 7 hours
Veerle Uhl
(...) ________________
Total: