PRE2020 3 Group2: Difference between revisions

From Control Systems Technology Group
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 39: Line 39:
* Enterprise  
* Enterprise  
* user persona/scenario
* user persona/scenario
=State-of-the-art=
All of our research discussed min 25 papers
Isabel
Human and robot interaction + already existing designs
Persuasive technologies
=Planning=
Approach and milestones
* how will we solve the problem?
* milestones per week
Week 1
Define functions needed
Research functions and design aspects
Week 2 Questionnaire for user input
Sketch proposed design
Week 3
Analyse questionnaire
Sketch detailed design
Create base simulation robot
Week 4
Finalize simulation
Start prototyping
Week 5
Week 6
Finish prototype
Week 7
Final video
Week 8
Final wiki
Planning table
-who does what in which week etc
-when is what done
=== Week 1 ===
{| border=1 style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 60%; height: 14em;"
! Name
! Total [h]
! Break-down
|-
! Okke Rikmenspoel
|
|
|-
! Christian Janssen
|
|
|-
! Richard van Loon
|
|
|-
! Ahmad Alsarakbi
|
|
|-
! Isabel Kuipers
|
|
|}
=== Week 2 ===
{| border=1 style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 60%; height: 14em;"
! Name
! Total [h]
! Break-down
|-
! Okke Rikmenspoel
|
|
|-
! Christian Janssen
|
|
|-
! Richard van Loon
|
|
|-
! Ahmad Alsarakbi
|
|
|-
! Isabel Kuipers
|
|
|}
=== Week 3 ===
{| border=1 style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 60%; height: 14em;"
! Name
! Total [h]
! Break-down
|-
! Okke Rikmenspoel
|
|
|-
! Christian Janssen
|
|
|-
! Richard van Loon
|
|
|-
! Ahmad Alsarakbi
|
|
|-
! Isabel Kuipers
|
|
|}

Revision as of 12:13, 16 February 2021

Robot Desk Companion

Group Members

Name Student ID Department Email address
Okke Rikmenspoel o.m.rikmenspoel@student.tue.nl
Christian Janssen c.h.f.janssen@student.tue.nl
Richard van Loon r.p.a.v.loon@student.tue.nl
Ahmad Alsarakbi 1285874 a.alsarakbi@student.tue.nl
Isabel Kuipers 1297325 i.e.kuipers@student.tue.nl

Problem statement

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic (which started in?), students had to work from home for longer periods of time. Different type of health problems occurred due to the work-from-home situation (source). Students sit in front of their screen for many hours, neglecting their health by not taking breaks or taking care of themselves. Concentration is heavily impacted as well, a phone is almost always in sight and nobody is telling them not to use it.

Students do not need a nanny bot, however, a robot which guides them in the right direction would be very beneficial (sources). This robot will be placed on the desk where the student works. The robot should not be too distracting (1). It should give friendly health-related reminders (2). And It should guide and motivate studying (3).

Objectives

  1. Not be too distracting.
  2. Support health during studying .
  3. Guide studying.

USE Analysis

  • Users
  • Society
  • Enterprise
  • user persona/scenario

State-of-the-art

All of our research discussed min 25 papers

Isabel Human and robot interaction + already existing designs

Persuasive technologies

Planning

Approach and milestones

  • how will we solve the problem?
  • milestones per week

Week 1 Define functions needed Research functions and design aspects Week 2 Questionnaire for user input Sketch proposed design Week 3 Analyse questionnaire Sketch detailed design Create base simulation robot Week 4 Finalize simulation Start prototyping Week 5

Week 6 Finish prototype Week 7 Final video

Week 8 Final wiki


Planning table -who does what in which week etc -when is what done

Week 1

Name Total [h] Break-down
Okke Rikmenspoel
Christian Janssen
Richard van Loon
Ahmad Alsarakbi
Isabel Kuipers

Week 2

Name Total [h] Break-down
Okke Rikmenspoel
Christian Janssen
Richard van Loon
Ahmad Alsarakbi
Isabel Kuipers

Week 3

Name Total [h] Break-down
Okke Rikmenspoel
Christian Janssen
Richard van Loon
Ahmad Alsarakbi
Isabel Kuipers
Retrieved from "https://dsdwiki.wtb.tue.nl/index.php?title=PRE2020_3_Group2&oldid=107193"